2018-04-18 03:33:18

by Doug Anderson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] regulator: Don't return or expect -errno from of_map_mode()

In of_get_regulation_constraints() we were taking the result of
of_map_mode() (an unsigned int) and assigning it to an int. We were
then checking whether this value was -EINVAL. Some implementers of
of_map_mode() were returning -EINVAL (even though the return type of
their function needed to be unsigned int) because they needed to to
signal an error back to of_get_regulation_constraints().

In general in the regulator framework the mode is always referred to
as an unsigned int. While we could fix this to be a signed int (the
highest value we store in there right now is 0x8), it's actually
pretty clean to just define the regulator mode 0x0 (the lack of any
bits set) as an invalid mode. Let's do that.

Suggested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
Fixes: 5e5e3a42c653 ("regulator: of: Add support for parsing initial and suspend modes")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
---

Changes in v2:
- Use Javier's suggestion of defining 0x0 as invalid

drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c | 2 +-
drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c | 15 +++++++++------
drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c | 2 +-
include/linux/regulator/consumer.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c
index f541b80f1b54..bd910fe123d9 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static unsigned int cpcap_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
case CPCAP_BIT_AUDIO_LOW_PWR:
return REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY;
default:
- return -EINVAL;
+ return REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID;
}
}

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
index f47264fa1940..22c02b7a338b 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
@@ -124,11 +124,12 @@ static void of_get_regulation_constraints(struct device_node *np,

if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "regulator-initial-mode", &pval)) {
if (desc && desc->of_map_mode) {
- ret = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
- if (ret == -EINVAL)
+ unsigned int mode = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
+
+ if (mode == REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID)
pr_err("%s: invalid mode %u\n", np->name, pval);
else
- constraints->initial_mode = ret;
+ constraints->initial_mode = mode;
} else {
pr_warn("%s: mapping for mode %d not defined\n",
np->name, pval);
@@ -163,12 +164,14 @@ static void of_get_regulation_constraints(struct device_node *np,
if (!of_property_read_u32(suspend_np, "regulator-mode",
&pval)) {
if (desc && desc->of_map_mode) {
- ret = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
- if (ret == -EINVAL)
+ unsigned int mode = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
+
+ mode = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
+ if (mode == REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID)
pr_err("%s: invalid mode %u\n",
np->name, pval);
else
- suspend_state->mode = ret;
+ suspend_state->mode = mode;
} else {
pr_warn("%s: mapping for mode %d not defined\n",
np->name, pval);
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
index a4456db5849d..884c7505ed91 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static inline unsigned int twl4030reg_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
case RES_STATE_SLEEP:
return REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY;
default:
- return -EINVAL;
+ return REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID;
}
}

diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h b/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h
index df176d7c2b87..25602afd4844 100644
--- a/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h
+++ b/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct regmap;
* These modes can be OR'ed together to make up a mask of valid register modes.
*/

+#define REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID 0x0
#define REGULATOR_MODE_FAST 0x1
#define REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL 0x2
#define REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE 0x4
--
2.17.0.484.g0c8726318c-goog



2018-04-18 07:17:15

by Javier Martinez Canillas

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: Don't return or expect -errno from of_map_mode()

Hi Doug,

Patch looks good to me, I just have some minor comments.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:31 AM, Douglas Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> In of_get_regulation_constraints() we were taking the result of
> of_map_mode() (an unsigned int) and assigning it to an int. We were
> then checking whether this value was -EINVAL. Some implementers of
> of_map_mode() were returning -EINVAL (even though the return type of
> their function needed to be unsigned int) because they needed to to

s/to to/to

> signal an error back to of_get_regulation_constraints().
>
> In general in the regulator framework the mode is always referred to
> as an unsigned int. While we could fix this to be a signed int (the
> highest value we store in there right now is 0x8), it's actually
> pretty clean to just define the regulator mode 0x0 (the lack of any
> bits set) as an invalid mode. Let's do that.
>
> Suggested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>
> Fixes: 5e5e3a42c653 ("regulator: of: Add support for parsing initial and suspend modes")
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Use Javier's suggestion of defining 0x0 as invalid
>
> drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c | 2 +-
> drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c | 15 +++++++++------
> drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/regulator/consumer.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c
> index f541b80f1b54..bd910fe123d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/cpcap-regulator.c
> @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static unsigned int cpcap_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
> case CPCAP_BIT_AUDIO_LOW_PWR:
> return REGULATOR_MODE_STANDBY;
> default:
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID;
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
> index f47264fa1940..22c02b7a338b 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
> @@ -124,11 +124,12 @@ static void of_get_regulation_constraints(struct device_node *np,
>
> if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "regulator-initial-mode", &pval)) {
> if (desc && desc->of_map_mode) {
> - ret = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
> - if (ret == -EINVAL)
> + unsigned int mode = desc->of_map_mode(pval);

I think the convention is to always declare local variables at the
start of the function? Although I couldn't find anything in the coding
style document...

> +
> + if (mode == REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID)
> pr_err("%s: invalid mode %u\n", np->name, pval);
> else
> - constraints->initial_mode = ret;
> + constraints->initial_mode = mode;
> } else {
> pr_warn("%s: mapping for mode %d not defined\n",
> np->name, pval);
> @@ -163,12 +164,14 @@ static void of_get_regulation_constraints(struct device_node *np,
> if (!of_property_read_u32(suspend_np, "regulator-mode",
> &pval)) {
> if (desc && desc->of_map_mode) {
> - ret = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
> - if (ret == -EINVAL)
> + unsigned int mode = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
> +
> + mode = desc->of_map_mode(pval);

You are calling .of_map_mode and assigning the return value twice here.

If you post a new version, feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>

Best regards,
Javier

2018-04-18 15:57:53

by Doug Anderson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: Don't return or expect -errno from of_map_mode()

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:15 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> @@ -124,11 +124,12 @@ static void of_get_regulation_constraints(struct device_node *np,
>>
>> if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "regulator-initial-mode", &pval)) {
>> if (desc && desc->of_map_mode) {
>> - ret = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
>> - if (ret == -EINVAL)
>> + unsigned int mode = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
>
> I think the convention is to always declare local variables at the
> start of the function? Although I couldn't find anything in the coding
> style document...

I haven't seen this as a consistent kernel convention. It seems a bit
up to the subsystem and/or driver maintainer. However, I'm happy to
put it up at the top if it makes people happy.


>> @@ -163,12 +164,14 @@ static void of_get_regulation_constraints(struct device_node *np,
>> if (!of_property_read_u32(suspend_np, "regulator-mode",
>> &pval)) {
>> if (desc && desc->of_map_mode) {
>> - ret = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
>> - if (ret == -EINVAL)
>> + unsigned int mode = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
>> +
>> + mode = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
>
> You are calling .of_map_mode and assigning the return value twice here.

Dang it, thanks for catching.


-Doug

2018-04-18 16:49:33

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: Don't return or expect -errno from of_map_mode()

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 08:56:22AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:15 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas

> >> if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "regulator-initial-mode", &pval)) {
> >> if (desc && desc->of_map_mode) {
> >> - ret = desc->of_map_mode(pval);
> >> - if (ret == -EINVAL)
> >> + unsigned int mode = desc->of_map_mode(pval);

> > I think the convention is to always declare local variables at the
> > start of the function? Although I couldn't find anything in the coding
> > style document...

> I haven't seen this as a consistent kernel convention. It seems a bit
> up to the subsystem and/or driver maintainer. However, I'm happy to
> put it up at the top if it makes people happy.

It's *fairly* consistent (this is C code after all) - doing something
different usually has some form of motivation.


Attachments:
(No filename) (943.00 B)
signature.asc (499.00 B)
Download all attachments