2022-07-10 16:41:01

by williamsukatube

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: ralink: Check for null return of devm_kcalloc

From: William Dean <[email protected]>

Because of the possible failure of the allocation, data->domains might
be NULL pointer and will cause the dereference of the NULL pointer
later.
Therefore, it might be better to check it and directly return -ENOMEM
without releasing data manually if fails, because the comment of the
devm_kmalloc() says "Memory allocated with this function is
automatically freed on driver detach.".

Fixes: a86854d0c599b ("treewide: devm_kzalloc() -> devm_kcalloc()")
Reported-by: Hacash Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: William Dean <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pinctrl/ralink/pinctrl-ralink.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/ralink/pinctrl-ralink.c b/drivers/pinctrl/ralink/pinctrl-ralink.c
index 63429a287434..770862f45b3f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/ralink/pinctrl-ralink.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/ralink/pinctrl-ralink.c
@@ -266,6 +266,8 @@ static int ralink_pinctrl_pins(struct ralink_priv *p)
p->func[i]->pin_count,
sizeof(int),
GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!p->func[i]->pins)
+ return -ENOMEM;
for (j = 0; j < p->func[i]->pin_count; j++)
p->func[i]->pins[j] = p->func[i]->pin_first + j;

--
2.25.1


2022-07-11 12:56:33

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: ralink: Check for null return of devm_kcalloc

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 5:49 PM <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: William Dean <[email protected]>
>
> Because of the possible failure of the allocation, data->domains might
> be NULL pointer and will cause the dereference of the NULL pointer
> later.
> Therefore, it might be better to check it and directly return -ENOMEM
> without releasing data manually if fails, because the comment of the
> devm_kmalloc() says "Memory allocated with this function is
> automatically freed on driver detach.".
>
> Fixes: a86854d0c599b ("treewide: devm_kzalloc() -> devm_kcalloc()")
> Reported-by: Hacash Robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: William Dean <[email protected]>

Patch applied for fixes!

Yours,
Linus Walleij