On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:48 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
>
> We're working towards removing the "multi-function" GPIO spinlock that's
> implemented terribly wrong. We tried using an RW-semaphore to protect
> the list of GPIO devices but it turned out that we still have old code
> using legacy GPIO calls that need to translate the global GPIO number to
> the address of the associated descriptor and - to that end - traverse
> the list while holding the lock. If we change the spinlock to a sleeping
> lock then we'll end up with "scheduling while atomic" bugs.
>
> Let's allow lockless traversal of the list using SRCU and only use the
> mutex when modyfing the list.
>
> While at it: let's protect the period between when we start the lookup
> and when we finally request the descriptor (increasing the reference
> count of the GPIO device) with the SRCU read lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
This looks to be doing the right thing to my RCU-untrained eye, so:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Yours,
Linus Walleij