From: Michael Hennerich <[email protected]>
This fixes:
[BUG] gpio: gpio-adp5588: A possible sleep-in-atomic-context bug
in adp5588_gpio_write()
[BUG] gpio: gpio-adp5588: A possible sleep-in-atomic-context bug
in adp5588_gpio_direction_input()
Reported-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Hennerich <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-adp5588.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-adp5588.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-adp5588.c
index e717f8d..202d367 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-adp5588.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-adp5588.c
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ struct adp5588_gpio {
uint8_t int_en[3];
uint8_t irq_mask[3];
uint8_t irq_stat[3];
+ uint8_t int_input_en[3];
+ uint8_t int_lvl_cached[3];
};
static int adp5588_gpio_read(struct i2c_client *client, u8 reg)
@@ -173,12 +175,28 @@ static void adp5588_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *d)
struct adp5588_gpio *dev = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
int i;
- for (i = 0; i <= ADP5588_BANK(ADP5588_MAXGPIO); i++)
+ for (i = 0; i <= ADP5588_BANK(ADP5588_MAXGPIO); i++) {
+ if (dev->int_input_en[i]) {
+ mutex_lock(&dev->lock);
+ dev->dir[i] &= ~dev->int_input_en[i];
+ dev->int_input_en[i] = 0;
+ adp5588_gpio_write(dev->client, GPIO_DIR1 + i,
+ dev->dir[i]);
+ mutex_unlock(&dev->lock);
+ }
+
+ if (dev->int_lvl_cached[i] != dev->int_lvl[i]) {
+ dev->int_lvl_cached[i] = dev->int_lvl[i];
+ adp5588_gpio_write(dev->client, GPIO_INT_LVL1 + i,
+ dev->int_lvl[i]);
+ }
+
if (dev->int_en[i] ^ dev->irq_mask[i]) {
dev->int_en[i] = dev->irq_mask[i];
adp5588_gpio_write(dev->client, GPIO_INT_EN1 + i,
dev->int_en[i]);
}
+ }
mutex_unlock(&dev->irq_lock);
}
@@ -221,9 +239,7 @@ static int adp5588_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
else
return -EINVAL;
- adp5588_gpio_direction_input(&dev->gpio_chip, gpio);
- adp5588_gpio_write(dev->client, GPIO_INT_LVL1 + bank,
- dev->int_lvl[bank]);
+ dev->int_input_en[bank] |= bit;
return 0;
}
--
2.7.4
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:53 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Michael Hennerich <[email protected]>
>
> This fixes:
> [BUG] gpio: gpio-adp5588: A possible sleep-in-atomic-context bug
> in adp5588_gpio_write()
> [BUG] gpio: gpio-adp5588: A possible sleep-in-atomic-context bug
> in adp5588_gpio_direction_input()
>
> Reported-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Hennerich <[email protected]>
Thanks Michael, excellent and prompt fix. Patch applied
for fixes (v4.19-rcs).
Should we even tag it for stable?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On 29.08.2018 10:55, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:53 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> From: Michael Hennerich <[email protected]>
>>
>> This fixes:
>> [BUG] gpio: gpio-adp5588: A possible sleep-in-atomic-context bug
>> in adp5588_gpio_write()
>> [BUG] gpio: gpio-adp5588: A possible sleep-in-atomic-context bug
>> in adp5588_gpio_direction_input()
>>
>> Reported-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Hennerich <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks Michael, excellent and prompt fix. Patch applied
> for fixes (v4.19-rcs).
>
> Should we even tag it for stable?
Thanks, Linus - Yes that would make sense.
--
Greetings,
Michael
--
Analog Devices GmbH Otl-Aicher Strasse 60-64 80807 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft München, Registergericht München HRB 40368,
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Steyerl, Thomas Edward Cribben, Eileen Wynne