On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 6:50 PM Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 02:40:15PM -0700, Kalesh Singh wrote:
> > [...]
> > + seq_file_path(m, file, "\n");
> > + seq_putc(m, '\n');
> >
> > /* show_fd_locks() never deferences files so a stale value is safe */
> > show_fd_locks(m, file, files);
>
> This comment implies "file" might be stale? Does that mean anything for
> the above seq_file_path()?
Hi Kees.
Thanks for taking a look. The comment above says the "files" pointer
can be stale. It doesn't affect our use of "file" here. seq_show()
takes the reference with get_file() so "file" wouldn't be destroyed
from under us.
Thanks,
Kalesh
>
> --
> Kees Cook