On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 5:26 AM Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
> That differs from the original exfat code, so something is odd here. I
> need some sort of clarification from Samsung as to when they changed the
> license in order to be able to relicense these files.
We should probably ask Valdis on what happened there.
Even the old exFAT v1.2.24 from Galaxy S7 is using "either version 2
of the License, or (at your option) any later version".
You can go check it yourself by searching "G930F" from
http://opensource.samsung.com.
I'm guessing he probably used "GPL-2.0" during his clean-up.
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 05:31:21 +0900, Ju Hyung Park said:
> We should probably ask Valdis on what happened there.
>
> Even the old exFAT v1.2.24 from Galaxy S7 is using "either version 2
> of the License, or (at your option) any later version".
> You can go check it yourself by searching "G930F" from
> http://opensource.samsung.com.
>
> I'm guessing he probably used "GPL-2.0" during his clean-up.
My screw-up.
Original had:
/*
* Copyright (C) 2012-2013 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
* of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
So yes, I dorked up the SPDX tags, as I didn't realize GPL-2.0-or-later
was an actual thing for those...