2024-05-23 13:15:59

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 00/16] 5.4.277-rc1 review

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.277 release.
There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.277-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.4.277-rc1

Akira Yokosawa <[email protected]>
docs: kernel_include.py: Cope with docutils 0.21

Daniel Thompson <[email protected]>
serial: kgdboc: Fix NMI-safety problems from keyboard reset code

Heikki Krogerus <[email protected]>
usb: typec: ucsi: displayport: Fix potential deadlock

Srinivasan Shanmugam <[email protected]>
drm/amdgpu: Fix possible NULL dereference in amdgpu_ras_query_error_status_helper()

Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>
btrfs: add missing mutex_unlock in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks()

Rob Herring <[email protected]>
arm64: dts: qcom: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells

Cristian Marussi <[email protected]>
firmware: arm_scmi: Harden accesses to the reset domains

Paulo Alcantara <[email protected]>
smb: client: fix potential OOBs in smb2_parse_contexts()

Doug Berger <[email protected]>
net: bcmgenet: synchronize UMAC_CMD access

Doug Berger <[email protected]>
net: bcmgenet: synchronize use of bcmgenet_set_rx_mode()

Doug Berger <[email protected]>
net: bcmgenet: synchronize EXT_RGMII_OOB_CTRL access

Doug Berger <[email protected]>
net: bcmgenet: keep MAC in reset until PHY is up

Doug Berger <[email protected]>
Revert "net: bcmgenet: use RGMII loopback for MAC reset"

Harshit Mogalapalli <[email protected]>
Revert "selftests: mm: fix map_hugetlb failure on 64K page size systems"

Baokun Li <[email protected]>
ext4: fix bug_on in __es_tree_search

Sergey Shtylyov <[email protected]>
pinctrl: core: handle radix_tree_insert() errors in pinctrl_register_one_pin()


-------------

Diffstat:

Documentation/sphinx/kernel_include.py | 1 -
Makefile | 4 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi | 8 +--
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/reset.c | 6 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 3 +
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c | 22 ++++--
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.h | 2 +
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet_wol.c | 12 +++-
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmmii.c | 43 +++---------
drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 14 +++-
drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c | 30 +++++++-
drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/displayport.c | 4 --
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 1 +
fs/cifs/smb2ops.c | 4 +-
fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c | 79 ++++++++++++++--------
fs/cifs/smb2proto.h | 10 +--
fs/ext4/extents.c | 10 +--
tools/testing/selftests/vm/map_hugetlb.c | 7 --
18 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)




2024-05-23 17:50:47

by Florian Fainelli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/16] 5.4.277-rc1 review

On 5/23/24 06:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.277 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.277-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:

Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian


2024-05-23 18:21:11

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/16] 5.4.277-rc1 review

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 03:12:33PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.277 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Tested-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>


Attachments:
(No filename) (352.00 B)
signature.asc (499.00 B)
Download all attachments

2024-05-24 06:55:52

by Harshit Mogalapalli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/16] 5.4.277-rc1 review

Hi Greg,

On 23/05/24 18:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.277 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>

No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.

Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Harshit

> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.277-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

2024-05-24 11:51:15

by Anders Roxell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/16] 5.4.277-rc1 review

On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 15:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.277 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.277-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 135 total, 135 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 35 total, 33 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 23 total, 17 passed, 6 failed
* mips: 25 total, 25 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 0 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-smoketest
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

2024-05-24 15:20:27

by Jon Hunter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/16] 5.4.277-rc1 review

On Thu, 23 May 2024 15:12:33 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.277 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.277-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v5.4:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
24 boots: 24 pass, 0 fail
54 tests: 54 pass, 0 fail

Linux version: 5.4.277-rc1-g4848ef9e7e21
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <[email protected]>

Jon

2024-05-24 16:26:25

by Shuah Khan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/16] 5.4.277-rc1 review

On 5/23/24 07:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.277 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.277-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>

thanks,
-- Shuah