2020-04-19 16:58:25

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fixed broken microcode early loading on 32 bit platforms because it always jumps past cpuid in sync_core() as data structure boot_cpu_data are not populated so early in boot. This is for 4.4. Should be done for 4.9 too

On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Evalds Iodzevics wrote:
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Your subject line is really confused :(


2020-04-20 05:53:49

by Evalds Iodzevics

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fixed broken microcode early loading on 32 bit platforms because it always jumps past cpuid in sync_core() as data structure boot_cpu_data are not populated so early in boot. This is for 4.4. Should be done for 4.9 too

Yeah, basically its a fix for early microcode load on x86 for 4.4 longterm
Just tried to say same problem exists on 4.9 too

On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 7:54 PM Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 07:29:43PM +0300, Evalds Iodzevics wrote:
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Your subject line is really confused :(
>

2020-04-20 06:10:12

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fixed broken microcode early loading on 32 bit platforms because it always jumps past cpuid in sync_core() as data structure boot_cpu_data are not populated so early in boot. This is for 4.4. Should be done for 4.9 too

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 08:52:07AM +0300, Evalds Iodzevics wrote:
> Yeah, basically its a fix for early microcode load on x86 for 4.4 longterm
> Just tried to say same problem exists on 4.9 too

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>