2023-12-19 13:52:04

by Menglong Dong

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/4] selftests/bpf: add testcase to verifier_bounds.c for BPF_JNE

Add testcase for the logic that the verifier tracks the BPF_JNE for regs.
The assembly function "reg_not_equal_const()" and "reg_equal_const" that
we add is exactly converted from the following case:

u32 a = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
u64 b = 0;

a %= 8;
/* the "a > 0" here will be optimized to "a != 0" */
if (a > 0) {
/* now the range of a should be [1, 7] */
bpf_skb_store_bytes(skb, 0, &b, a, 0);
}

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <[email protected]>
---
v5:
- add some comments to the function that we add
- add reg_not_equal_const()
---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c
index ec430b71730b..960998f16306 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c
@@ -1075,4 +1075,66 @@ l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
: __clobber_all);
}

+SEC("tc")
+__description("bounds check with JMP_NE for reg edge")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void reg_not_equal_const(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r6 = r1; \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \
+ call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \
+ r4 = r0; \
+ r4 &= 7; \
+ if r4 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+l0_%=: r1 = r6; \
+ r2 = 0; \
+ r3 = r10; \
+ r3 += -8; \
+ r5 = 0; \
+ /* The 4th argument of bpf_skb_store_bytes is defined as \
+ * ARG_CONST_SIZE, so 0 is not allowed. The 'r4 != 0' \
+ * is providing us this exclusion of zero from initial \
+ * [0, 7] range. \
+ */ \
+ call %[bpf_skb_store_bytes]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32),
+ __imm(bpf_skb_store_bytes)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__description("bounds check with JMP_EQ for reg edge")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void reg_equal_const(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r6 = r1; \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \
+ call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \
+ r4 = r0; \
+ r4 &= 7; \
+ if r4 == 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ r1 = r6; \
+ r2 = 0; \
+ r3 = r10; \
+ r3 += -8; \
+ r5 = 0; \
+ /* Just the same as what we do in reg_not_equal_const() */ \
+ call %[bpf_skb_store_bytes]; \
+l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32),
+ __imm(bpf_skb_store_bytes)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.39.2



2023-12-19 18:42:31

by Andrii Nakryiko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/4] selftests/bpf: add testcase to verifier_bounds.c for BPF_JNE

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 5:51 AM Menglong Dong <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Add testcase for the logic that the verifier tracks the BPF_JNE for regs.
> The assembly function "reg_not_equal_const()" and "reg_equal_const" that
> we add is exactly converted from the following case:
>
> u32 a = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
> u64 b = 0;
>
> a %= 8;
> /* the "a > 0" here will be optimized to "a != 0" */
> if (a > 0) {
> /* now the range of a should be [1, 7] */
> bpf_skb_store_bytes(skb, 0, &b, a, 0);
> }
>
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <[email protected]>
> ---
> v5:
> - add some comments to the function that we add
> - add reg_not_equal_const()
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
>

LGTM

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c
> index ec430b71730b..960998f16306 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds.c
> @@ -1075,4 +1075,66 @@ l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
> : __clobber_all);
> }
>
> +SEC("tc")
> +__description("bounds check with JMP_NE for reg edge")
> +__success __retval(0)
> +__naked void reg_not_equal_const(void)
> +{
> + asm volatile (" \
> + r6 = r1; \
> + r1 = 0; \
> + *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \
> + call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \
> + r4 = r0; \
> + r4 &= 7; \
> + if r4 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
> + r0 = 0; \
> + exit; \
> +l0_%=: r1 = r6; \
> + r2 = 0; \
> + r3 = r10; \
> + r3 += -8; \
> + r5 = 0; \
> + /* The 4th argument of bpf_skb_store_bytes is defined as \
> + * ARG_CONST_SIZE, so 0 is not allowed. The 'r4 != 0' \
> + * is providing us this exclusion of zero from initial \
> + * [0, 7] range. \
> + */ \
> + call %[bpf_skb_store_bytes]; \
> + r0 = 0; \
> + exit; \
> +" :
> + : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32),
> + __imm(bpf_skb_store_bytes)
> + : __clobber_all);
> +}
> +
> +SEC("tc")
> +__description("bounds check with JMP_EQ for reg edge")
> +__success __retval(0)
> +__naked void reg_equal_const(void)
> +{
> + asm volatile (" \
> + r6 = r1; \
> + r1 = 0; \
> + *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \
> + call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \
> + r4 = r0; \
> + r4 &= 7; \
> + if r4 == 0 goto l0_%=; \
> + r1 = r6; \
> + r2 = 0; \
> + r3 = r10; \
> + r3 += -8; \
> + r5 = 0; \
> + /* Just the same as what we do in reg_not_equal_const() */ \
> + call %[bpf_skb_store_bytes]; \
> +l0_%=: r0 = 0; \
> + exit; \
> +" :
> + : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32),
> + __imm(bpf_skb_store_bytes)
> + : __clobber_all);
> +}
> +
> char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> --
> 2.39.2
>