This patch set implements two speed ups for uprobe/uretprobe runtime execution
path for some common scenarios: BPF-only uprobes (patches #1 and #2) and
system-wide (non-PID-specific) uprobes (patch #3). Please see individual
patches for details.
v1->v2:
- rebased onto trace/core branch of tracing tree, hopefully I guessed right;
- simplified user_cpu_buffer usage further (Oleg Nesterov);
- simplified patch #3, just moved speculative check outside of lock (Oleg);
- added Reviewed-by from Jiri Olsa.
Andrii Nakryiko (3):
uprobes: encapsulate preparation of uprobe args buffer
uprobes: prepare uprobe args buffer lazily
uprobes: add speculative lockless system-wide uprobe filter check
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
Move the logic of fetching temporary per-CPU uprobe buffer and storing
uprobes args into it to a new helper function. Store data size as part
of this buffer, simplifying interfaces a bit, as now we only pass single
uprobe_cpu_buffer reference around, instead of pointer + dsize.
This logic was duplicated across uprobe_dispatcher and uretprobe_dispatcher,
and now will be centralized. All this is also in preparation to make
this uprobe_cpu_buffer handling logic optional in the next patch.
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index a84b85d8aac1..9bffaab448a6 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -854,6 +854,7 @@ static const struct file_operations uprobe_profile_ops = {
struct uprobe_cpu_buffer {
struct mutex mutex;
void *buf;
+ int dsize;
};
static struct uprobe_cpu_buffer __percpu *uprobe_cpu_buffer;
static int uprobe_buffer_refcnt;
@@ -943,9 +944,26 @@ static void uprobe_buffer_put(struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb)
mutex_unlock(&ucb->mutex);
}
+static struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *prepare_uprobe_buffer(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb;
+ int dsize, esize;
+
+ esize = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
+ dsize = __get_data_size(&tu->tp, regs);
+
+ ucb = uprobe_buffer_get();
+ ucb->dsize = tu->tp.size + dsize;
+
+ store_trace_args(ucb->buf, &tu->tp, regs, esize, dsize);
+
+ return ucb;
+}
+
static void __uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb, int dsize,
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb,
struct trace_event_file *trace_file)
{
struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *entry;
@@ -956,14 +974,14 @@ static void __uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
WARN_ON(call != trace_file->event_call);
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(tu->tp.size + dsize > PAGE_SIZE))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ucb->dsize > PAGE_SIZE))
return;
if (trace_trigger_soft_disabled(trace_file))
return;
esize = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
- size = esize + tu->tp.size + dsize;
+ size = esize + ucb->dsize;
entry = trace_event_buffer_reserve(&fbuffer, trace_file, size);
if (!entry)
return;
@@ -977,14 +995,14 @@ static void __uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false);
}
- memcpy(data, ucb->buf, tu->tp.size + dsize);
+ memcpy(data, ucb->buf, ucb->dsize);
trace_event_buffer_commit(&fbuffer);
}
/* uprobe handler */
static int uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb, int dsize)
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb)
{
struct event_file_link *link;
@@ -993,7 +1011,7 @@ static int uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs,
rcu_read_lock();
trace_probe_for_each_link_rcu(link, &tu->tp)
- __uprobe_trace_func(tu, 0, regs, ucb, dsize, link->file);
+ __uprobe_trace_func(tu, 0, regs, ucb, link->file);
rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
@@ -1001,13 +1019,13 @@ static int uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs,
static void uretprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, unsigned long func,
struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb, int dsize)
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb)
{
struct event_file_link *link;
rcu_read_lock();
trace_probe_for_each_link_rcu(link, &tu->tp)
- __uprobe_trace_func(tu, func, regs, ucb, dsize, link->file);
+ __uprobe_trace_func(tu, func, regs, ucb, link->file);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -1335,7 +1353,7 @@ static bool uprobe_perf_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *uc,
static void __uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb, int dsize)
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb)
{
struct trace_event_call *call = trace_probe_event_call(&tu->tp);
struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *entry;
@@ -1356,7 +1374,7 @@ static void __uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
esize = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
- size = esize + tu->tp.size + dsize;
+ size = esize + ucb->dsize;
size = ALIGN(size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64)) - sizeof(u32);
if (WARN_ONCE(size > PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE, "profile buffer not large enough"))
return;
@@ -1379,13 +1397,10 @@ static void __uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false);
}
- memcpy(data, ucb->buf, tu->tp.size + dsize);
+ memcpy(data, ucb->buf, ucb->dsize);
- if (size - esize > tu->tp.size + dsize) {
- int len = tu->tp.size + dsize;
-
- memset(data + len, 0, size - esize - len);
- }
+ if (size - esize > ucb->dsize)
+ memset(data + ucb->dsize, 0, size - esize - ucb->dsize);
perf_trace_buf_submit(entry, size, rctx, call->event.type, 1, regs,
head, NULL);
@@ -1395,21 +1410,21 @@ static void __uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
/* uprobe profile handler */
static int uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb, int dsize)
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb)
{
if (!uprobe_perf_filter(&tu->consumer, 0, current->mm))
return UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE;
if (!is_ret_probe(tu))
- __uprobe_perf_func(tu, 0, regs, ucb, dsize);
+ __uprobe_perf_func(tu, 0, regs, ucb);
return 0;
}
static void uretprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, unsigned long func,
struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb, int dsize)
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb)
{
- __uprobe_perf_func(tu, func, regs, ucb, dsize);
+ __uprobe_perf_func(tu, func, regs, ucb);
}
int bpf_get_uprobe_info(const struct perf_event *event, u32 *fd_type,
@@ -1475,10 +1490,8 @@ static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs)
struct trace_uprobe *tu;
struct uprobe_dispatch_data udd;
struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb;
- int dsize, esize;
int ret = 0;
-
tu = container_of(con, struct trace_uprobe, consumer);
tu->nhit++;
@@ -1490,18 +1503,14 @@ static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!uprobe_cpu_buffer))
return 0;
- dsize = __get_data_size(&tu->tp, regs);
- esize = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
-
- ucb = uprobe_buffer_get();
- store_trace_args(ucb->buf, &tu->tp, regs, esize, dsize);
+ ucb = prepare_uprobe_buffer(tu, regs);
if (trace_probe_test_flag(&tu->tp, TP_FLAG_TRACE))
- ret |= uprobe_trace_func(tu, regs, ucb, dsize);
+ ret |= uprobe_trace_func(tu, regs, ucb);
#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
if (trace_probe_test_flag(&tu->tp, TP_FLAG_PROFILE))
- ret |= uprobe_perf_func(tu, regs, ucb, dsize);
+ ret |= uprobe_perf_func(tu, regs, ucb);
#endif
uprobe_buffer_put(ucb);
return ret;
@@ -1513,7 +1522,6 @@ static int uretprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con,
struct trace_uprobe *tu;
struct uprobe_dispatch_data udd;
struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb;
- int dsize, esize;
tu = container_of(con, struct trace_uprobe, consumer);
@@ -1525,18 +1533,14 @@ static int uretprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con,
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!uprobe_cpu_buffer))
return 0;
- dsize = __get_data_size(&tu->tp, regs);
- esize = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
-
- ucb = uprobe_buffer_get();
- store_trace_args(ucb->buf, &tu->tp, regs, esize, dsize);
+ ucb = prepare_uprobe_buffer(tu, regs);
if (trace_probe_test_flag(&tu->tp, TP_FLAG_TRACE))
- uretprobe_trace_func(tu, func, regs, ucb, dsize);
+ uretprobe_trace_func(tu, func, regs, ucb);
#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
if (trace_probe_test_flag(&tu->tp, TP_FLAG_PROFILE))
- uretprobe_perf_func(tu, func, regs, ucb, dsize);
+ uretprobe_perf_func(tu, func, regs, ucb);
#endif
uprobe_buffer_put(ucb);
return 0;
--
2.43.0
uprobe_cpu_buffer and corresponding logic to store uprobe args into it
are used for uprobes/uretprobes that are created through tracefs or
perf events.
BPF is yet another user of uprobe/uretprobe infrastructure, but doesn't
need uprobe_cpu_buffer and associated data. For BPF-only use cases this
buffer handling and preparation is a pure overhead. At the same time,
BPF-only uprobe/uretprobe usage is very common in practice. Also, for
a lot of cases applications are very senstivie to performance overheads,
as they might be tracing a very high frequency functions like
malloc()/free(), so every bit of performance improvement matters.
All that is to say that this uprobe_cpu_buffer preparation is an
unnecessary overhead that each BPF user of uprobes/uretprobe has to pay.
This patch is changing this by making uprobe_cpu_buffer preparation
optional. It will happen only if either tracefs-based or perf event-based
uprobe/uretprobe consumer is registered for given uprobe/uretprobe. For
BPF-only use cases this step will be skipped.
We used uprobe/uretprobe benchmark which is part of BPF selftests (see [0])
to estimate the improvements. We have 3 uprobe and 3 uretprobe
scenarios, which vary an instruction that is replaced by uprobe: nop
(fastest uprobe case), `push rbp` (typical case), and non-simulated
`ret` instruction (slowest case). Benchmark thread is constantly calling
user space function in a tight loop. User space function has attached
BPF uprobe or uretprobe program doing nothing but atomic counter
increments to count number of triggering calls. Benchmark emits
throughput in millions of executions per second.
BEFORE these changes
====================
uprobe-nop : 2.657 ± 0.024M/s
uprobe-push : 2.499 ± 0.018M/s
uprobe-ret : 1.100 ± 0.006M/s
uretprobe-nop : 1.356 ± 0.004M/s
uretprobe-push : 1.317 ± 0.019M/s
uretprobe-ret : 0.785 ± 0.007M/s
AFTER these changes
===================
uprobe-nop : 2.732 ± 0.022M/s (+2.8%)
uprobe-push : 2.621 ± 0.016M/s (+4.9%)
uprobe-ret : 1.105 ± 0.007M/s (+0.5%)
uretprobe-nop : 1.396 ± 0.007M/s (+2.9%)
uretprobe-push : 1.347 ± 0.008M/s (+2.3%)
uretprobe-ret : 0.800 ± 0.006M/s (+1.9)
So the improvements on this particular machine seems to be between 2% and 5%.
[0] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 9bffaab448a6..b5da95240a31 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -941,15 +941,21 @@ static struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *uprobe_buffer_get(void)
static void uprobe_buffer_put(struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb)
{
+ if (!ucb)
+ return;
mutex_unlock(&ucb->mutex);
}
static struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *prepare_uprobe_buffer(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
+ struct pt_regs *regs,
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer **ucbp)
{
struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb;
int dsize, esize;
+ if (*ucbp)
+ return *ucbp;
+
esize = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
dsize = __get_data_size(&tu->tp, regs);
@@ -958,22 +964,25 @@ static struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *prepare_uprobe_buffer(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
store_trace_args(ucb->buf, &tu->tp, regs, esize, dsize);
+ *ucbp = ucb;
return ucb;
}
static void __uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb,
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer **ucbp,
struct trace_event_file *trace_file)
{
struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *entry;
struct trace_event_buffer fbuffer;
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb;
void *data;
int size, esize;
struct trace_event_call *call = trace_probe_event_call(&tu->tp);
WARN_ON(call != trace_file->event_call);
+ ucb = prepare_uprobe_buffer(tu, regs, ucbp);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ucb->dsize > PAGE_SIZE))
return;
@@ -1002,7 +1011,7 @@ static void __uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
/* uprobe handler */
static int uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb)
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer **ucbp)
{
struct event_file_link *link;
@@ -1011,7 +1020,7 @@ static int uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs,
rcu_read_lock();
trace_probe_for_each_link_rcu(link, &tu->tp)
- __uprobe_trace_func(tu, 0, regs, ucb, link->file);
+ __uprobe_trace_func(tu, 0, regs, ucbp, link->file);
rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
@@ -1019,13 +1028,13 @@ static int uprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs,
static void uretprobe_trace_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, unsigned long func,
struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb)
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer **ucbp)
{
struct event_file_link *link;
rcu_read_lock();
trace_probe_for_each_link_rcu(link, &tu->tp)
- __uprobe_trace_func(tu, func, regs, ucb, link->file);
+ __uprobe_trace_func(tu, func, regs, ucbp, link->file);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -1353,10 +1362,11 @@ static bool uprobe_perf_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *uc,
static void __uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb)
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer **ucbp)
{
struct trace_event_call *call = trace_probe_event_call(&tu->tp);
struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *entry;
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb;
struct hlist_head *head;
void *data;
int size, esize;
@@ -1374,6 +1384,7 @@ static void __uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
esize = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
+ ucb = prepare_uprobe_buffer(tu, regs, ucbp);
size = esize + ucb->dsize;
size = ALIGN(size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64)) - sizeof(u32);
if (WARN_ONCE(size > PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE, "profile buffer not large enough"))
@@ -1410,21 +1421,21 @@ static void __uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
/* uprobe profile handler */
static int uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb)
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer **ucbp)
{
if (!uprobe_perf_filter(&tu->consumer, 0, current->mm))
return UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE;
if (!is_ret_probe(tu))
- __uprobe_perf_func(tu, 0, regs, ucb);
+ __uprobe_perf_func(tu, 0, regs, ucbp);
return 0;
}
static void uretprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, unsigned long func,
struct pt_regs *regs,
- struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb)
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer **ucbp)
{
- __uprobe_perf_func(tu, func, regs, ucb);
+ __uprobe_perf_func(tu, func, regs, ucbp);
}
int bpf_get_uprobe_info(const struct perf_event *event, u32 *fd_type,
@@ -1489,7 +1500,7 @@ static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct trace_uprobe *tu;
struct uprobe_dispatch_data udd;
- struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb;
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb = NULL;
int ret = 0;
tu = container_of(con, struct trace_uprobe, consumer);
@@ -1503,14 +1514,12 @@ static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!uprobe_cpu_buffer))
return 0;
- ucb = prepare_uprobe_buffer(tu, regs);
-
if (trace_probe_test_flag(&tu->tp, TP_FLAG_TRACE))
- ret |= uprobe_trace_func(tu, regs, ucb);
+ ret |= uprobe_trace_func(tu, regs, &ucb);
#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
if (trace_probe_test_flag(&tu->tp, TP_FLAG_PROFILE))
- ret |= uprobe_perf_func(tu, regs, ucb);
+ ret |= uprobe_perf_func(tu, regs, &ucb);
#endif
uprobe_buffer_put(ucb);
return ret;
@@ -1521,7 +1530,7 @@ static int uretprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con,
{
struct trace_uprobe *tu;
struct uprobe_dispatch_data udd;
- struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb;
+ struct uprobe_cpu_buffer *ucb = NULL;
tu = container_of(con, struct trace_uprobe, consumer);
@@ -1533,14 +1542,12 @@ static int uretprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con,
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!uprobe_cpu_buffer))
return 0;
- ucb = prepare_uprobe_buffer(tu, regs);
-
if (trace_probe_test_flag(&tu->tp, TP_FLAG_TRACE))
- uretprobe_trace_func(tu, func, regs, ucb);
+ uretprobe_trace_func(tu, func, regs, &ucb);
#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
if (trace_probe_test_flag(&tu->tp, TP_FLAG_PROFILE))
- uretprobe_perf_func(tu, func, regs, ucb);
+ uretprobe_perf_func(tu, func, regs, &ucb);
#endif
uprobe_buffer_put(ucb);
return 0;
--
2.43.0
It's very common with BPF-based uprobe/uretprobe use cases to have
a system-wide (not PID specific) probes used. In this case uprobe's
trace_uprobe_filter->nr_systemwide counter is bumped at registration
time, and actual filtering is short circuited at the time when
uprobe/uretprobe is triggered.
This is a great optimization, and the only issue with it is that to even
get to checking this counter uprobe subsystem is taking
read-side trace_uprobe_filter->rwlock. This is actually noticeable in
profiles and is just another point of contention when uprobe is
triggered on multiple CPUs simultaneously.
This patch moves this nr_systemwide check outside of filter list's
rwlock scope, as rwlock is meant to protect list modification, while
nr_systemwide-based check is speculative and racy already, despite the
lock (as discussed in [0]). trace_uprobe_filter_remove() and
trace_uprobe_filter_add() already check for filter->nr_systewide
explicitly outside of __uprobe_perf_filter, so no modifications are
required there.
Confirming with BPF selftests's based benchmarks.
BEFORE (based on changes in previous patch)
===========================================
uprobe-nop : 2.732 ± 0.022M/s
uprobe-push : 2.621 ± 0.016M/s
uprobe-ret : 1.105 ± 0.007M/s
uretprobe-nop : 1.396 ± 0.007M/s
uretprobe-push : 1.347 ± 0.008M/s
uretprobe-ret : 0.800 ± 0.006M/s
AFTER
=====
uprobe-nop : 2.878 ± 0.017M/s (+5.5%, total +8.3%)
uprobe-push : 2.753 ± 0.013M/s (+5.3%, total +10.2%)
uprobe-ret : 1.142 ± 0.010M/s (+3.8%, total +3.8%)
uretprobe-nop : 1.444 ± 0.008M/s (+3.5%, total +6.5%)
uretprobe-push : 1.410 ± 0.010M/s (+4.8%, total +7.1%)
uretprobe-ret : 0.816 ± 0.002M/s (+2.0%, total +3.9%)
In the above, first percentage value is based on top of previous patch
(lazy uprobe buffer optimization), while the "total" percentage is
based on kernel without any of the changes in this patch set.
As can be seen, we get about 4% - 10% speed up, in total, with both lazy
uprobe buffer and speculative filter check optimizations.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index b5da95240a31..ac05885a6ce6 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -1226,9 +1226,6 @@ __uprobe_perf_filter(struct trace_uprobe_filter *filter, struct mm_struct *mm)
{
struct perf_event *event;
- if (filter->nr_systemwide)
- return true;
-
list_for_each_entry(event, &filter->perf_events, hw.tp_list) {
if (event->hw.target->mm == mm)
return true;
@@ -1353,6 +1350,13 @@ static bool uprobe_perf_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *uc,
tu = container_of(uc, struct trace_uprobe, consumer);
filter = tu->tp.event->filter;
+ /*
+ * speculative short-circuiting check to avoid unnecessarily taking
+ * filter->rwlock below, if the uprobe has system-wide consumer
+ */
+ if (READ_ONCE(filter->nr_systemwide))
+ return true;
+
read_lock(&filter->rwlock);
ret = __uprobe_perf_filter(filter, mm);
read_unlock(&filter->rwlock);
--
2.43.0
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:17:25 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> wrote:
> This patch set implements two speed ups for uprobe/uretprobe runtime execution
> path for some common scenarios: BPF-only uprobes (patches #1 and #2) and
> system-wide (non-PID-specific) uprobes (patch #3). Please see individual
> patches for details.
This series looks good to me. Let me pick it on probes/for-next.
Thanks!
>
> v1->v2:
> - rebased onto trace/core branch of tracing tree, hopefully I guessed right;
> - simplified user_cpu_buffer usage further (Oleg Nesterov);
> - simplified patch #3, just moved speculative check outside of lock (Oleg);
> - added Reviewed-by from Jiri Olsa.
>
> Andrii Nakryiko (3):
> uprobes: encapsulate preparation of uprobe args buffer
> uprobes: prepare uprobe args buffer lazily
> uprobes: add speculative lockless system-wide uprobe filter check
>
> kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:20:57 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:17:25 -0700
> Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This patch set implements two speed ups for uprobe/uretprobe runtime execution
> > path for some common scenarios: BPF-only uprobes (patches #1 and #2) and
> > system-wide (non-PID-specific) uprobes (patch #3). Please see individual
> > patches for details.
>
> This series looks good to me. Let me pick it on probes/for-next.
Ah, and
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
for this series.
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > v1->v2:
> > - rebased onto trace/core branch of tracing tree, hopefully I guessed right;
> > - simplified user_cpu_buffer usage further (Oleg Nesterov);
> > - simplified patch #3, just moved speculative check outside of lock (Oleg);
> > - added Reviewed-by from Jiri Olsa.
> >
> > Andrii Nakryiko (3):
> > uprobes: encapsulate preparation of uprobe args buffer
> > uprobes: prepare uprobe args buffer lazily
> > uprobes: add speculative lockless system-wide uprobe filter check
> >
> > kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
>
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
On 03/18, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> Andrii Nakryiko (3):
> uprobes: encapsulate preparation of uprobe args buffer
> uprobes: prepare uprobe args buffer lazily
> uprobes: add speculative lockless system-wide uprobe filter check
>
> kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 9:21 PM Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:17:25 -0700
> Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This patch set implements two speed ups for uprobe/uretprobe runtime execution
> > path for some common scenarios: BPF-only uprobes (patches #1 and #2) and
> > system-wide (non-PID-specific) uprobes (patch #3). Please see individual
> > patches for details.
>
> This series looks good to me. Let me pick it on probes/for-next.
Great, at least I guessed the Git repo right, if not the branch.
Thanks for pulling it in! I assume some other uprobe-related follow up
patches should be based on probes/for-next as well, right?
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > v1->v2:
> > - rebased onto trace/core branch of tracing tree, hopefully I guessed right;
> > - simplified user_cpu_buffer usage further (Oleg Nesterov);
> > - simplified patch #3, just moved speculative check outside of lock (Oleg);
> > - added Reviewed-by from Jiri Olsa.
> >
> > Andrii Nakryiko (3):
> > uprobes: encapsulate preparation of uprobe args buffer
> > uprobes: prepare uprobe args buffer lazily
> > uprobes: add speculative lockless system-wide uprobe filter check
> >
> > kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
>
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 09:19:19 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 9:21 PM Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:17:25 -0700
> > Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > This patch set implements two speed ups for uprobe/uretprobe runtime execution
> > > path for some common scenarios: BPF-only uprobes (patches #1 and #2) and
> > > system-wide (non-PID-specific) uprobes (patch #3). Please see individual
> > > patches for details.
> >
> > This series looks good to me. Let me pick it on probes/for-next.
>
> Great, at least I guessed the Git repo right, if not the branch.
> Thanks for pulling it in! I assume some other uprobe-related follow up
> patches should be based on probes/for-next as well, right?
Yes, I'll pick those on linux-trace tree's probes/* branchs
(if there is an urgent patch, it will go through probes/fixes)
Thank you!
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > >
> > > v1->v2:
> > > - rebased onto trace/core branch of tracing tree, hopefully I guessed right;
> > > - simplified user_cpu_buffer usage further (Oleg Nesterov);
> > > - simplified patch #3, just moved speculative check outside of lock (Oleg);
> > > - added Reviewed-by from Jiri Olsa.
> > >
> > > Andrii Nakryiko (3):
> > > uprobes: encapsulate preparation of uprobe args buffer
> > > uprobes: prepare uprobe args buffer lazily
> > > uprobes: add speculative lockless system-wide uprobe filter check
> > >
> > > kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > > 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>