Change logs:
v4 --> v5:
- Include Daniel's patch-set into this one.
v3 --> v4:
- Change "version1.0" to "version 1.0" in the commit log.
- Update the devicetree binding document to support the imx7ulp mu.
- Rebase the patch refer to the following bug-fixs patch-set issued
by Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>.
"https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11069479/"
v2 --> v3:
- Format the patch-set refer to Oleksij's guidance.
- Init the register array by a simple way recommended by Oleksij.
- Add Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]> tag.
v1 --> v2:
- Use to have the register layout linked on probe, suggested by
Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>.
- Add Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]> tag.
Daniel Baluta (2):
mailbox: imx: Fix Tx doorbell shutdown path
mailbox: imx: Clear the right interrupts at shutdown
Richard Zhu (2):
dt-bindings: mailbox: imx-mu: add imx7ulp MU support
mailbox: imx: add support for imx v1 mu
.../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.txt | 2 +
drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
From: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
Tx doorbell is handled by txdb_tasklet and doesn't
have an associated IRQ.
Anyhow, imx_mu_shutdown ignores this and tries to
free an IRQ that wasn't requested for Tx DB resulting
in the following warning:
[ 1.967644] Trying to free already-free IRQ 26
[ 1.972108] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 157 at kernel/irq/manage.c:1708 __free_irq+0xc0/0x358
[ 1.980024] Modules linked in:
[ 1.983088] CPU: 2 PID: 157 Comm: kworker/2:1 Tainted: G
[ 1.993524] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX8QXP MEK (DT)
[ 1.998668] Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
[ 2.003812] pstate: 60000085 (nZCv daIf -PAN -UAO)
[ 2.008607] pc : __free_irq+0xc0/0x358
[ 2.012364] lr : __free_irq+0xc0/0x358
[ 2.016111] sp : ffff00001179b7e0
[ 2.019422] x29: ffff00001179b7e0 x28: 0000000000000018
[ 2.024736] x27: ffff000011233000 x26: 0000000000000004
[ 2.030053] x25: 000000000000001a x24: ffff80083bec74d4
[ 2.035369] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffff80083bec7588
[ 2.040686] x21: ffff80083b1fe8d8 x20: ffff80083bec7400
[ 2.046003] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
[ 2.051320] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
[ 2.056637] x15: ffff0000111296c8 x14: ffff00009179b517
[ 2.061953] x13: ffff00001179b525 x12: ffff000011142000
[ 2.067270] x11: ffff000011129f20 x10: ffff0000105da970
[ 2.072587] x9 : 00000000ffffffd0 x8 : 0000000000000194
[ 2.077903] x7 : 612065657266206f x6 : ffff0000111e7b09
[ 2.083220] x5 : 0000000000000003 x4 : 0000000000000000
[ 2.088537] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 00000000ffffffff
[ 2.093854] x1 : 28b70f0a2b60a500 x0 : 0000000000000000
[ 2.099173] Call trace:
[ 2.101618] __free_irq+0xc0/0x358
[ 2.105021] free_irq+0x38/0x98
[ 2.108170] imx_mu_shutdown+0x90/0xb0
[ 2.111921] mbox_free_channel.part.2+0x24/0xb8
[ 2.116453] mbox_free_channel+0x18/0x28
This bug is present from the beginning of times.
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
index 25be8bb..1eeabc5 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
@@ -214,8 +214,10 @@ static void imx_mu_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
struct imx_mu_priv *priv = to_imx_mu_priv(chan->mbox);
struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = chan->con_priv;
- if (cp->type == IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB)
+ if (cp->type == IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB) {
tasklet_kill(&cp->txdb_tasklet);
+ return;
+ }
imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0,
IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx) | IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(cp->idx));
--
2.7.4
There is a version 1.0 MU on i.MX7ULP platform.
One new version ID register is added, and it's offset is 0.
TRn registers are defined at the offset 0x20 ~ 0x2C.
RRn registers are defined at the offset 0x40 ~ 0x4C.
SR/CR registers are defined at 0x60/0x64.
Extend this driver to support it.
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
index afe625e..2cdcdc5 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
@@ -12,19 +12,11 @@
#include <linux/of_device.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
-/* Transmit Register */
-#define IMX_MU_xTRn(x) (0x00 + 4 * (x))
-/* Receive Register */
-#define IMX_MU_xRRn(x) (0x10 + 4 * (x))
-/* Status Register */
-#define IMX_MU_xSR 0x20
#define IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
#define IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(x) BIT(24 + (3 - (x)))
#define IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(x) BIT(20 + (3 - (x)))
#define IMX_MU_xSR_BRDIP BIT(9)
-/* Control Register */
-#define IMX_MU_xCR 0x24
/* General Purpose Interrupt Enable */
#define IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
/* Receive Interrupt Enable */
@@ -44,6 +36,13 @@ enum imx_mu_chan_type {
IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB, /* Rx doorbell */
};
+struct imx_mu_dcfg {
+ u32 xTR[4]; /* Transmit Registers */
+ u32 xRR[4]; /* Receive Registers */
+ u32 xSR; /* Status Register */
+ u32 xCR; /* Control Register */
+};
+
struct imx_mu_con_priv {
unsigned int idx;
char irq_desc[IMX_MU_CHAN_NAME_SIZE];
@@ -61,12 +60,27 @@ struct imx_mu_priv {
struct mbox_chan mbox_chans[IMX_MU_CHANS];
struct imx_mu_con_priv con_priv[IMX_MU_CHANS];
+ const struct imx_mu_dcfg *dcfg;
struct clk *clk;
int irq;
bool side_b;
};
+static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
+ .xTR = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
+ .xRR = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
+ .xSR = 0x20,
+ .xCR = 0x24,
+};
+
+static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
+ .xTR = {0x20, 0x24, 0x28, 0x2c},
+ .xRR = {0x40, 0x44, 0x48, 0x4c},
+ .xSR = 0x60,
+ .xCR = 0x64,
+};
+
static struct imx_mu_priv *to_imx_mu_priv(struct mbox_controller *mbox)
{
return container_of(mbox, struct imx_mu_priv, mbox);
@@ -88,10 +102,10 @@ static u32 imx_mu_xcr_rmw(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, u32 set, u32 clr)
u32 val;
spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
- val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR);
+ val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
val &= ~clr;
val |= set;
- imx_mu_write(priv, val, IMX_MU_xCR);
+ imx_mu_write(priv, val, priv->dcfg->xCR);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
return val;
@@ -111,8 +125,8 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = chan->con_priv;
u32 val, ctrl, dat;
- ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR);
- val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xSR);
+ ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
+ val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xSR);
switch (cp->type) {
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
@@ -138,10 +152,10 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
mbox_chan_txdone(chan, 0);
} else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(cp->idx)) {
- dat = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xRRn(cp->idx));
+ dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[cp->idx]);
mbox_chan_received_data(chan, (void *)&dat);
} else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx)) {
- imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx), IMX_MU_xSR);
+ imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx), priv->dcfg->xSR);
mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
} else {
dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Not handled interrupt\n");
@@ -159,7 +173,7 @@ static int imx_mu_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
switch (cp->type) {
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
- imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, IMX_MU_xTRn(cp->idx));
+ imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR[cp->idx]);
imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB:
@@ -270,7 +284,7 @@ static void imx_mu_init_generic(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
return;
/* Set default MU configuration */
- imx_mu_write(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR);
+ imx_mu_write(priv, 0, priv->dcfg->xCR);
}
static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -278,6 +292,7 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
struct imx_mu_priv *priv;
+ const struct imx_mu_dcfg *dcfg;
unsigned int i;
int ret;
@@ -295,6 +310,11 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (priv->irq < 0)
return priv->irq;
+ dcfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+ if (!dcfg)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ priv->dcfg = dcfg;
+
priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) != -ENOENT)
@@ -348,7 +368,8 @@ static int imx_mu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
static const struct of_device_id imx_mu_dt_ids[] = {
- { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu" },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx },
{ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_mu_dt_ids);
--
2.7.4
From: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
Make sure to only clear enabled interrupts keeping count
of the connection type.
Suggested-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
index 1eeabc5..afe625e 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
@@ -219,8 +219,19 @@ static void imx_mu_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
return;
}
- imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0,
- IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx) | IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(cp->idx));
+ switch (cp->type) {
+ case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
+ break;
+ case IMX_MU_TYPE_RX:
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(cp->idx));
+ break;
+ case IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB:
+ imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(cp->idx));
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
free_irq(priv->irq, chan);
}
--
2.7.4
There is a version 1.0 MU on imx7ulp, use "fsl,imx7ulp-mu" compatible
to support it.
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.txt | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.txt
index f3cf77e..9c43357 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.txt
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ Required properties:
imx6sx, imx7s, imx8qxp, imx8qm.
The "fsl,imx6sx-mu" compatible is seen as generic and should
be included together with SoC specific compatible.
+ There is a version 1.0 MU on imx7ulp, use "fsl,imx7ulp-mu"
+ compatible to support it.
- reg : Should contain the registers location and length
- interrupts : Interrupt number. The interrupt specifier format depends
on the interrupt controller parent.
--
2.7.4
+ Rob
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:18 AM Richard Zhu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There is a version 1.0 MU on imx7ulp, use "fsl,imx7ulp-mu" compatible
> to support it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.txt | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.txt
> index f3cf77e..9c43357 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.txt
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ Required properties:
> imx6sx, imx7s, imx8qxp, imx8qm.
> The "fsl,imx6sx-mu" compatible is seen as generic and should
> be included together with SoC specific compatible.
> + There is a version 1.0 MU on imx7ulp, use "fsl,imx7ulp-mu"
> + compatible to support it.
> - reg : Should contain the registers location and length
> - interrupts : Interrupt number. The interrupt specifier format depends
> on the interrupt controller parent.
> --
> 2.7.4
>
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:16 AM Richard Zhu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There is a version 1.0 MU on i.MX7ULP platform.
> One new version ID register is added, and it's offset is 0.
> TRn registers are defined at the offset 0x20 ~ 0x2C.
> RRn registers are defined at the offset 0x40 ~ 0x4C.
> SR/CR registers are defined at 0x60/0x64.
> Extend this driver to support it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
Very clean solution. Thanks Richard!
Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> index afe625e..2cdcdc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> @@ -12,19 +12,11 @@
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> -/* Transmit Register */
> -#define IMX_MU_xTRn(x) (0x00 + 4 * (x))
> -/* Receive Register */
> -#define IMX_MU_xRRn(x) (0x10 + 4 * (x))
> -/* Status Register */
> -#define IMX_MU_xSR 0x20
> #define IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
> #define IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(x) BIT(24 + (3 - (x)))
> #define IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(x) BIT(20 + (3 - (x)))
> #define IMX_MU_xSR_BRDIP BIT(9)
>
> -/* Control Register */
> -#define IMX_MU_xCR 0x24
> /* General Purpose Interrupt Enable */
> #define IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
> /* Receive Interrupt Enable */
> @@ -44,6 +36,13 @@ enum imx_mu_chan_type {
> IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB, /* Rx doorbell */
> };
>
> +struct imx_mu_dcfg {
> + u32 xTR[4]; /* Transmit Registers */
> + u32 xRR[4]; /* Receive Registers */
> + u32 xSR; /* Status Register */
> + u32 xCR; /* Control Register */
> +};
> +
> struct imx_mu_con_priv {
> unsigned int idx;
> char irq_desc[IMX_MU_CHAN_NAME_SIZE];
> @@ -61,12 +60,27 @@ struct imx_mu_priv {
> struct mbox_chan mbox_chans[IMX_MU_CHANS];
>
> struct imx_mu_con_priv con_priv[IMX_MU_CHANS];
> + const struct imx_mu_dcfg *dcfg;
> struct clk *clk;
> int irq;
>
> bool side_b;
> };
>
> +static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
> + .xTR = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
> + .xRR = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
> + .xSR = 0x20,
> + .xCR = 0x24,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
> + .xTR = {0x20, 0x24, 0x28, 0x2c},
> + .xRR = {0x40, 0x44, 0x48, 0x4c},
> + .xSR = 0x60,
> + .xCR = 0x64,
> +};
> +
> static struct imx_mu_priv *to_imx_mu_priv(struct mbox_controller *mbox)
> {
> return container_of(mbox, struct imx_mu_priv, mbox);
> @@ -88,10 +102,10 @@ static u32 imx_mu_xcr_rmw(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, u32 set, u32 clr)
> u32 val;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
> - val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR);
> + val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> val &= ~clr;
> val |= set;
> - imx_mu_write(priv, val, IMX_MU_xCR);
> + imx_mu_write(priv, val, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
>
> return val;
> @@ -111,8 +125,8 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
> struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = chan->con_priv;
> u32 val, ctrl, dat;
>
> - ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR);
> - val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xSR);
> + ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> + val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xSR);
>
> switch (cp->type) {
> case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
> @@ -138,10 +152,10 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
> imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
> mbox_chan_txdone(chan, 0);
> } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(cp->idx)) {
> - dat = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xRRn(cp->idx));
> + dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[cp->idx]);
> mbox_chan_received_data(chan, (void *)&dat);
> } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx)) {
> - imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx), IMX_MU_xSR);
> + imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx), priv->dcfg->xSR);
> mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
> } else {
> dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Not handled interrupt\n");
> @@ -159,7 +173,7 @@ static int imx_mu_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
>
> switch (cp->type) {
> case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
> - imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, IMX_MU_xTRn(cp->idx));
> + imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR[cp->idx]);
> imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
> break;
> case IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB:
> @@ -270,7 +284,7 @@ static void imx_mu_init_generic(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
> return;
>
> /* Set default MU configuration */
> - imx_mu_write(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR);
> + imx_mu_write(priv, 0, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> }
>
> static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -278,6 +292,7 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> struct imx_mu_priv *priv;
> + const struct imx_mu_dcfg *dcfg;
> unsigned int i;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -295,6 +310,11 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (priv->irq < 0)
> return priv->irq;
>
> + dcfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> + if (!dcfg)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + priv->dcfg = dcfg;
> +
> priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) != -ENOENT)
> @@ -348,7 +368,8 @@ static int imx_mu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id imx_mu_dt_ids[] = {
> - { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu" },
> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp },
> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx },
> { },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_mu_dt_ids);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Hi Richard,
Can you please rebase and resend this patch series?
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:21 PM Daniel Baluta <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:16 AM Richard Zhu <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > There is a version 1.0 MU on i.MX7ULP platform.
> > One new version ID register is added, and it's offset is 0.
> > TRn registers are defined at the offset 0x20 ~ 0x2C.
> > RRn registers are defined at the offset 0x40 ~ 0x4C.
> > SR/CR registers are defined at 0x60/0x64.
> > Extend this driver to support it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
> > Suggested-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
>
> Very clean solution. Thanks Richard!
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > index afe625e..2cdcdc5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > @@ -12,19 +12,11 @@
> > #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> > -/* Transmit Register */
> > -#define IMX_MU_xTRn(x) (0x00 + 4 * (x))
> > -/* Receive Register */
> > -#define IMX_MU_xRRn(x) (0x10 + 4 * (x))
> > -/* Status Register */
> > -#define IMX_MU_xSR 0x20
> > #define IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
> > #define IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(x) BIT(24 + (3 - (x)))
> > #define IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(x) BIT(20 + (3 - (x)))
> > #define IMX_MU_xSR_BRDIP BIT(9)
> >
> > -/* Control Register */
> > -#define IMX_MU_xCR 0x24
> > /* General Purpose Interrupt Enable */
> > #define IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
> > /* Receive Interrupt Enable */
> > @@ -44,6 +36,13 @@ enum imx_mu_chan_type {
> > IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB, /* Rx doorbell */
> > };
> >
> > +struct imx_mu_dcfg {
> > + u32 xTR[4]; /* Transmit Registers */
> > + u32 xRR[4]; /* Receive Registers */
> > + u32 xSR; /* Status Register */
> > + u32 xCR; /* Control Register */
> > +};
> > +
> > struct imx_mu_con_priv {
> > unsigned int idx;
> > char irq_desc[IMX_MU_CHAN_NAME_SIZE];
> > @@ -61,12 +60,27 @@ struct imx_mu_priv {
> > struct mbox_chan mbox_chans[IMX_MU_CHANS];
> >
> > struct imx_mu_con_priv con_priv[IMX_MU_CHANS];
> > + const struct imx_mu_dcfg *dcfg;
> > struct clk *clk;
> > int irq;
> >
> > bool side_b;
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
> > + .xTR = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
> > + .xRR = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
> > + .xSR = 0x20,
> > + .xCR = 0x24,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
> > + .xTR = {0x20, 0x24, 0x28, 0x2c},
> > + .xRR = {0x40, 0x44, 0x48, 0x4c},
> > + .xSR = 0x60,
> > + .xCR = 0x64,
> > +};
> > +
> > static struct imx_mu_priv *to_imx_mu_priv(struct mbox_controller *mbox)
> > {
> > return container_of(mbox, struct imx_mu_priv, mbox);
> > @@ -88,10 +102,10 @@ static u32 imx_mu_xcr_rmw(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, u32 set, u32 clr)
> > u32 val;
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
> > - val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > + val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > val &= ~clr;
> > val |= set;
> > - imx_mu_write(priv, val, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > + imx_mu_write(priv, val, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
> >
> > return val;
> > @@ -111,8 +125,8 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
> > struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = chan->con_priv;
> > u32 val, ctrl, dat;
> >
> > - ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > - val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xSR);
> > + ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > + val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xSR);
> >
> > switch (cp->type) {
> > case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
> > @@ -138,10 +152,10 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
> > imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
> > mbox_chan_txdone(chan, 0);
> > } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(cp->idx)) {
> > - dat = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xRRn(cp->idx));
> > + dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[cp->idx]);
> > mbox_chan_received_data(chan, (void *)&dat);
> > } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx)) {
> > - imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx), IMX_MU_xSR);
> > + imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx), priv->dcfg->xSR);
> > mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
> > } else {
> > dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Not handled interrupt\n");
> > @@ -159,7 +173,7 @@ static int imx_mu_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
> >
> > switch (cp->type) {
> > case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
> > - imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, IMX_MU_xTRn(cp->idx));
> > + imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR[cp->idx]);
> > imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
> > break;
> > case IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB:
> > @@ -270,7 +284,7 @@ static void imx_mu_init_generic(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
> > return;
> >
> > /* Set default MU configuration */
> > - imx_mu_write(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > + imx_mu_write(priv, 0, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > }
> >
> > static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > @@ -278,6 +292,7 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > struct imx_mu_priv *priv;
> > + const struct imx_mu_dcfg *dcfg;
> > unsigned int i;
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -295,6 +310,11 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (priv->irq < 0)
> > return priv->irq;
> >
> > + dcfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > + if (!dcfg)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + priv->dcfg = dcfg;
> > +
> > priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> > if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> > if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) != -ENOENT)
> > @@ -348,7 +368,8 @@ static int imx_mu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> >
> > static const struct of_device_id imx_mu_dt_ids[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu" },
> > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp },
> > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx },
> > { },
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_mu_dt_ids);
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
Hi Daniel:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
> Sent: 2019年10月8日 15:26
> To: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>;
> Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>; Aisheng Dong
> <[email protected]>; dl-linux-imx <[email protected]>; Linux Kernel
> Mailing List <[email protected]>; linux-arm-kernel
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] mailbox: imx: add support for imx v1
> mu
>
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Can you please rebase and resend this patch series?
>
[Richard Zhu] No problem, I would resend this patch-set later.
Best Regards
Richard Zhu
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:21 PM Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:16 AM Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > There is a version 1.0 MU on i.MX7ULP platform.
> > > One new version ID register is added, and it's offset is 0.
> > > TRn registers are defined at the offset 0x20 ~ 0x2C.
> > > RRn registers are defined at the offset 0x40 ~ 0x4C.
> > > SR/CR registers are defined at 0x60/0x64.
> > > Extend this driver to support it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
> > > Suggested-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
> > > Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
> > > Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
> >
> > Very clean solution. Thanks Richard!
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 55
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > > b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c index afe625e..2cdcdc5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > > @@ -12,19 +12,11 @@
> > > #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > >
> > > -/* Transmit Register */
> > > -#define IMX_MU_xTRn(x) (0x00 + 4 * (x))
> > > -/* Receive Register */
> > > -#define IMX_MU_xRRn(x) (0x10 + 4 * (x))
> > > -/* Status Register */
> > > -#define IMX_MU_xSR 0x20
> > > #define IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
> > > #define IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(x) BIT(24 + (3 - (x)))
> > > #define IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(x) BIT(20 + (3 - (x)))
> > > #define IMX_MU_xSR_BRDIP BIT(9)
> > >
> > > -/* Control Register */
> > > -#define IMX_MU_xCR 0x24
> > > /* General Purpose Interrupt Enable */
> > > #define IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
> > > /* Receive Interrupt Enable */
> > > @@ -44,6 +36,13 @@ enum imx_mu_chan_type {
> > > IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB, /* Rx doorbell */
> > > };
> > >
> > > +struct imx_mu_dcfg {
> > > + u32 xTR[4]; /* Transmit Registers */
> > > + u32 xRR[4]; /* Receive Registers */
> > > + u32 xSR; /* Status Register */
> > > + u32 xCR; /* Control Register */
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > struct imx_mu_con_priv {
> > > unsigned int idx;
> > > char
> irq_desc[IMX_MU_CHAN_NAME_SIZE];
> > > @@ -61,12 +60,27 @@ struct imx_mu_priv {
> > > struct mbox_chan mbox_chans[IMX_MU_CHANS];
> > >
> > > struct imx_mu_con_priv con_priv[IMX_MU_CHANS];
> > > + const struct imx_mu_dcfg *dcfg;
> > > struct clk *clk;
> > > int irq;
> > >
> > > bool side_b;
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
> > > + .xTR = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
> > > + .xRR = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
> > > + .xSR = 0x20,
> > > + .xCR = 0x24,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
> > > + .xTR = {0x20, 0x24, 0x28, 0x2c},
> > > + .xRR = {0x40, 0x44, 0x48, 0x4c},
> > > + .xSR = 0x60,
> > > + .xCR = 0x64,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > static struct imx_mu_priv *to_imx_mu_priv(struct mbox_controller
> > > *mbox) {
> > > return container_of(mbox, struct imx_mu_priv, mbox); @@
> > > -88,10 +102,10 @@ static u32 imx_mu_xcr_rmw(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
> u32 set, u32 clr)
> > > u32 val;
> > >
> > > spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
> > > - val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > > + val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > > val &= ~clr;
> > > val |= set;
> > > - imx_mu_write(priv, val, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > > + imx_mu_write(priv, val, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
> > >
> > > return val;
> > > @@ -111,8 +125,8 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
> > > struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = chan->con_priv;
> > > u32 val, ctrl, dat;
> > >
> > > - ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > > - val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xSR);
> > > + ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > > + val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xSR);
> > >
> > > switch (cp->type) {
> > > case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
> > > @@ -138,10 +152,10 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
> > > imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
> > > mbox_chan_txdone(chan, 0);
> > > } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(cp->idx)) {
> > > - dat = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xRRn(cp->idx));
> > > + dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[cp->idx]);
> > > mbox_chan_received_data(chan, (void *)&dat);
> > > } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx)) {
> > > - imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx),
> IMX_MU_xSR);
> > > + imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx),
> > > + priv->dcfg->xSR);
> > > mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
> > > } else {
> > > dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Not handled
> > > interrupt\n"); @@ -159,7 +173,7 @@ static int
> > > imx_mu_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
> > >
> > > switch (cp->type) {
> > > case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
> > > - imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, IMX_MU_xTRn(cp->idx));
> > > + imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR[cp->idx]);
> > > imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
> > > break;
> > > case IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB:
> > > @@ -270,7 +284,7 @@ static void imx_mu_init_generic(struct imx_mu_priv
> *priv)
> > > return;
> > >
> > > /* Set default MU configuration */
> > > - imx_mu_write(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > > + imx_mu_write(priv, 0, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) @@ -278,6
> > > +292,7 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > > struct imx_mu_priv *priv;
> > > + const struct imx_mu_dcfg *dcfg;
> > > unsigned int i;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > @@ -295,6 +310,11 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> > > if (priv->irq < 0)
> > > return priv->irq;
> > >
> > > + dcfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > > + if (!dcfg)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + priv->dcfg = dcfg;
> > > +
> > > priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> > > if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> > > if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) != -ENOENT) @@ -348,7 +368,8
> > > @@ static int imx_mu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) }
> > >
> > > static const struct of_device_id imx_mu_dt_ids[] = {
> > > - { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu" },
> > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp },
> > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx
> > > + },
> > > { },
> > > };
> > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_mu_dt_ids);
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >
Hi Daniel:
New version patch-set had been sent out on Oct9.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11180683/
Best Regards
Richard Zhu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Zhu
> Sent: 2019年10月9日 9:48
> To: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>;
> Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>; Aisheng Dong
> <[email protected]>; dl-linux-imx <[email protected]>; Linux Kernel
> Mailing List <[email protected]>; linux-arm-kernel
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] mailbox: imx: add support for
> imx v1 mu
>
> Hi Daniel:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
> > Sent: 2019年10月8日 15:26
> > To: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; Oleksij Rempel
> > <[email protected]>; Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>;
> > Aisheng Dong <[email protected]>; dl-linux-imx
> <[email protected]>;
> > Linux Kernel Mailing List <[email protected]>;
> > linux-arm-kernel <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 4/4] mailbox: imx: add support for
> > imx v1 mu
> >
> >
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > Can you please rebase and resend this patch series?
> >
> [Richard Zhu] No problem, I would resend this patch-set later.
>
>
> Best Regards
> Richard Zhu
>
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:21 PM Daniel Baluta
> > <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:16 AM Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There is a version 1.0 MU on i.MX7ULP platform.
> > > > One new version ID register is added, and it's offset is 0.
> > > > TRn registers are defined at the offset 0x20 ~ 0x2C.
> > > > RRn registers are defined at the offset 0x40 ~ 0x4C.
> > > > SR/CR registers are defined at 0x60/0x64.
> > > > Extend this driver to support it.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
> > > > Suggested-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Very clean solution. Thanks Richard!
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 55
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > > > b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c index afe625e..2cdcdc5 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > > > @@ -12,19 +12,11 @@
> > > > #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > > >
> > > > -/* Transmit Register */
> > > > -#define IMX_MU_xTRn(x) (0x00 + 4 * (x))
> > > > -/* Receive Register */
> > > > -#define IMX_MU_xRRn(x) (0x10 + 4 * (x))
> > > > -/* Status Register */
> > > > -#define IMX_MU_xSR 0x20
> > > > #define IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
> > > > #define IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(x) BIT(24 + (3 - (x)))
> > > > #define IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(x) BIT(20 + (3 - (x)))
> > > > #define IMX_MU_xSR_BRDIP BIT(9)
> > > >
> > > > -/* Control Register */
> > > > -#define IMX_MU_xCR 0x24
> > > > /* General Purpose Interrupt Enable */
> > > > #define IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
> > > > /* Receive Interrupt Enable */
> > > > @@ -44,6 +36,13 @@ enum imx_mu_chan_type {
> > > > IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB, /* Rx doorbell */
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > +struct imx_mu_dcfg {
> > > > + u32 xTR[4]; /* Transmit Registers */
> > > > + u32 xRR[4]; /* Receive Registers */
> > > > + u32 xSR; /* Status Register */
> > > > + u32 xCR; /* Control Register */
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > struct imx_mu_con_priv {
> > > > unsigned int idx;
> > > > char
> > irq_desc[IMX_MU_CHAN_NAME_SIZE];
> > > > @@ -61,12 +60,27 @@ struct imx_mu_priv {
> > > > struct mbox_chan mbox_chans[IMX_MU_CHANS];
> > > >
> > > > struct imx_mu_con_priv con_priv[IMX_MU_CHANS];
> > > > + const struct imx_mu_dcfg *dcfg;
> > > > struct clk *clk;
> > > > int irq;
> > > >
> > > > bool side_b;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > +static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
> > > > + .xTR = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
> > > > + .xRR = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
> > > > + .xSR = 0x20,
> > > > + .xCR = 0x24,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
> > > > + .xTR = {0x20, 0x24, 0x28, 0x2c},
> > > > + .xRR = {0x40, 0x44, 0x48, 0x4c},
> > > > + .xSR = 0x60,
> > > > + .xCR = 0x64,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > static struct imx_mu_priv *to_imx_mu_priv(struct mbox_controller
> > > > *mbox) {
> > > > return container_of(mbox, struct imx_mu_priv, mbox); @@
> > > > -88,10 +102,10 @@ static u32 imx_mu_xcr_rmw(struct imx_mu_priv
> > > > *priv,
> > u32 set, u32 clr)
> > > > u32 val;
> > > >
> > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
> > > > - val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > > > + val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > > > val &= ~clr;
> > > > val |= set;
> > > > - imx_mu_write(priv, val, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > > > + imx_mu_write(priv, val, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
> > > >
> > > > return val;
> > > > @@ -111,8 +125,8 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
> > > > struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = chan->con_priv;
> > > > u32 val, ctrl, dat;
> > > >
> > > > - ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > > > - val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xSR);
> > > > + ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > > > + val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xSR);
> > > >
> > > > switch (cp->type) {
> > > > case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
> > > > @@ -138,10 +152,10 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
> > > > imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0,
> IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
> > > > mbox_chan_txdone(chan, 0);
> > > > } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(cp->idx)) {
> > > > - dat = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xRRn(cp->idx));
> > > > + dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[cp->idx]);
> > > > mbox_chan_received_data(chan, (void *)&dat);
> > > > } else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx)) {
> > > > - imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx),
> > IMX_MU_xSR);
> > > > + imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx),
> > > > + priv->dcfg->xSR);
> > > > mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
> > > > } else {
> > > > dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Not handled
> > > > interrupt\n"); @@ -159,7 +173,7 @@ static int
> > > > imx_mu_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
> > > >
> > > > switch (cp->type) {
> > > > case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
> > > > - imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, IMX_MU_xTRn(cp->idx));
> > > > + imx_mu_write(priv, *arg,
> > > > + priv->dcfg->xTR[cp->idx]);
> > > > imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv,
> IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
> > > > break;
> > > > case IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB:
> > > > @@ -270,7 +284,7 @@ static void imx_mu_init_generic(struct
> > > > imx_mu_priv
> > *priv)
> > > > return;
> > > >
> > > > /* Set default MU configuration */
> > > > - imx_mu_write(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR);
> > > > + imx_mu_write(priv, 0, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) @@ -278,6
> > > > +292,7 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > > > struct imx_mu_priv *priv;
> > > > + const struct imx_mu_dcfg *dcfg;
> > > > unsigned int i;
> > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -295,6 +310,11 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct
> > > > platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > > > if (priv->irq < 0)
> > > > return priv->irq;
> > > >
> > > > + dcfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > > > + if (!dcfg)
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > + priv->dcfg = dcfg;
> > > > +
> > > > priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> > > > if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> > > > if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) != -ENOENT) @@ -348,7
> > > > +368,8 @@ static int imx_mu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static const struct of_device_id imx_mu_dt_ids[] = {
> > > > - { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu" },
> > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-mu", .data =
> &imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp },
> > > > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu", .data =
> > > > + &imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx },
> > > > { },
> > > > };
> > > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_mu_dt_ids);
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4
> > > >
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 4:12 AM Richard Zhu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel:
> New version patch-set had been sent out on Oct9.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11180683/
Thanks Richard. Jassi, care to have a look?
Daniel
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:07 AM Daniel Baluta <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Since we got no answer from Jassi in 4 months I think it is safe
> to assume that we can get this through Shawn's tree.
>
Please don't top post.
This patchset doesn't lack my love. It contains support for a new
platform and was sent after last merge window. I send new
features/support only for next release. If you want some urgent
bugfixes picked , please send them separately.
Cheers!