2019-07-03 00:54:03

by Rob Herring

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: add binding for the Lantiq VRX200 and ARX300 PCIe PHYs

On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:35 PM Martin Blumenstingl
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Add the bindings for the PCIe PHY on Lantiq VRX200 and ARX300 SoCs.
> The IP block contains settings for the PHY and a PLL.
> The PLL mode is configurable through a dedicated #phy-cell in .dts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../dt-bindings/phy/phy-lantiq-vrx200-pcie.h | 11 +++
> 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/phy/phy-lantiq-vrx200-pcie.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b7b222e772d0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

The preference is (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) for new bindings.

> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Lantiq VRX200 and ARX300 PCIe PHY Device Tree Bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Martin Blumenstingl <[email protected]>
> +
> +properties:
> + "#phy-cells":
> + const: 1
> + description: selects the PHY mode as defined in <dt-bindings/phy/phy-lantiq-vrx200-pcie.h>
> +
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy
> + - lantiq,arx300-pcie-phy
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clocks:
> + items:
> + - description: PHY module clock
> + - description: PDI register clock
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: phy
> + - const: pdi
> +
> + resets:
> + items:
> + - description: exclusive PHY reset line
> + - description: shared reset line between the PCIe PHY and PCIe controller
> +
> + resets-names:
> + items:
> + - const: phy
> + - const: pcie
> +
> + lantiq,rcu:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description: phandle to the RCU syscon

You need to define the type (and drop maxItems):

$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle

> +
> + lantiq,rcu-endian-offset:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + description: the offset of the endian registers for this PHY instance in the RCU syscon
> +
> + lantiq,rcu-big-endian-mask:
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + description: the mask to set the PDI (PHY) registers for this PHY instance to big endian
> +
> +required:
> + - "#phy-cells"
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - clocks
> + - clock-names
> + - resets
> + - reset-names
> + - lantiq,rcu
> + - lantiq,rcu-endian-offset
> + - lantiq,rcu-big-endian-mask
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + pcie0_phy: phy@106800 {
> + compatible = "lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy";
> + reg = <0x106800 0x100>;
> + lantiq,rcu = <&rcu0>;
> + lantiq,rcu-endian-offset = <0x4c>;
> + lantiq,rcu-big-endian-mask = <0x80>; /* bit 7 */
> + big-endian;

The example will fail to validate because big-endian is not listed as
a property and you have 'additionalProperties: false'. So you have to
either list big-endian or drop additionalProperties.

Note that the examples are validated against the schema in linux-next now.

Rob


2019-07-03 08:59:53

by Martin Blumenstingl

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: add binding for the Lantiq VRX200 and ARX300 PCIe PHYs

Hi Rob,

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:34 AM Rob Herring <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:35 PM Martin Blumenstingl
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Add the bindings for the PCIe PHY on Lantiq VRX200 and ARX300 SoCs.
> > The IP block contains settings for the PHY and a PLL.
> > The PLL mode is configurable through a dedicated #phy-cell in .dts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
> > .../dt-bindings/phy/phy-lantiq-vrx200-pcie.h | 11 +++
> > 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/phy/phy-lantiq-vrx200-pcie.h
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..b7b222e772d0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> The preference is (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) for new bindings.
to make sure I understand this correctly:
the license is then only valid for the bindings - is it fine if the
driver uses GPL-2.0-only?

I don't have any datasheet for these SoCs so all my knowledge is based
on the GPL-2.0-only driver from the Lantiq board support package
(called "UGW").
the .yaml file is 100% my own work so I'm fine with having GPL-2.0 OR
BSD-2-Clause
however, that still has to be compatible with my driver, which I chose
to be GPL-2.0-only because that's the license from the Lantiq board
support package


Martin

2019-07-03 13:31:43

by Rob Herring

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: add binding for the Lantiq VRX200 and ARX300 PCIe PHYs

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:58 AM Martin Blumenstingl
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:34 AM Rob Herring <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:35 PM Martin Blumenstingl
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Add the bindings for the PCIe PHY on Lantiq VRX200 and ARX300 SoCs.
> > > The IP block contains settings for the PHY and a PLL.
> > > The PLL mode is configurable through a dedicated #phy-cell in .dts.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml | 87 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > .../dt-bindings/phy/phy-lantiq-vrx200-pcie.h | 11 +++
> > > 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> > > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/phy/phy-lantiq-vrx200-pcie.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..b7b222e772d0
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/lantiq,vrx200-pcie-phy.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >
> > The preference is (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) for new bindings.
> to make sure I understand this correctly:
> the license is then only valid for the bindings - is it fine if the
> driver uses GPL-2.0-only?

Yes, as this isn't derived from the driver code nor used by the driver
code (though that would be fine).

BTW, 'GPL-2.0-only' is the newer, preferred form of 'GPL-2.0', so I
guess we should be using (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause).

> I don't have any datasheet for these SoCs so all my knowledge is based
> on the GPL-2.0-only driver from the Lantiq board support package
> (called "UGW").
> the .yaml file is 100% my own work so I'm fine with having GPL-2.0 OR
> BSD-2-Clause
> however, that still has to be compatible with my driver, which I chose
> to be GPL-2.0-only because that's the license from the Lantiq board
> support package
>
>
> Martin