2023-09-22 18:17:35

by Jagan Teki

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)

On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 15:04, Cancan Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear Media Maintainers:
> Thanks for your attention. Before describing my problem,let me introduce to you what I mean by NPU.
> NPU is Neural Processing Unit, It is designed for deep learning acceleration, It is also called TPU, APU ..
>
> The real problems:
> When I was about to upstream my NPU driver codes to linux mainline, i meet two problems:
> 1. According to my research, There is no NPU module path in the linux (base on linux 6.5.4) , I have searched all linux projects and found no organization or comany that has submitted NPU code. Is there a path prepared for NPU driver currently?
> 2. If there is no NPU driver path currently, I am going to put my NPU driver code in the drivers/media/platform/amlogic/ , because my NPU driver belongs to amlogic. and amlogic NPU is mainly used for AI vision applications. Is this plan suitabe for you?

If I'm correct about the discussion with Oded Gabby before. I think
the drivers/accel/ is proper for AI Accelerators including NPU.

+ Oded in case he can comment.

Thanks,
Jagan.


2023-09-22 18:40:48

by Oded Gabbay

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)

On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:38 PM Jagan Teki <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 15:04, Cancan Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Media Maintainers:
> > Thanks for your attention. Before describing my problem,let me introduce to you what I mean by NPU.
> > NPU is Neural Processing Unit, It is designed for deep learning acceleration, It is also called TPU, APU ..
> >
> > The real problems:
> > When I was about to upstream my NPU driver codes to linux mainline, i meet two problems:
> > 1. According to my research, There is no NPU module path in the linux (base on linux 6.5.4) , I have searched all linux projects and found no organization or comany that has submitted NPU code. Is there a path prepared for NPU driver currently?
> > 2. If there is no NPU driver path currently, I am going to put my NPU driver code in the drivers/media/platform/amlogic/ , because my NPU driver belongs to amlogic. and amlogic NPU is mainly used for AI vision applications. Is this plan suitabe for you?
>
> If I'm correct about the discussion with Oded Gabby before. I think
> the drivers/accel/ is proper for AI Accelerators including NPU.
>
> + Oded in case he can comment.
>
> Thanks,
> Jagan.
Thanks Jagan for adding me to this thread. Adding Dave & Daniel as well.

Indeed, the drivers/accel is the place for Accelerators, mainly for
AI/Deep-Learning accelerators.
We currently have 3 drivers there already.

The accel subsystem is part of the larger drm subsystem. Basically, to
get into accel, you need to integrate your driver with the drm at the
basic level (registering a device, hooking up with the proper
callbacks). ofc the more you use code from drm, the better.
You can take a look at the drivers under accel for some examples on
how to do that.

Could you please describe in a couple of sentences what your
accelerator does, which engines it contains, how you program it. i.e.
Is it a fixed-function device where you write to a couple of registers
to execute workloads, or is it a fully programmable device where you
load compiled code into it (GPU style) ?

For better background on the accel subsystem, please read the following:
https://docs.kernel.org/accel/introduction.html
This introduction also contains links to other important email threads
and to Dave Airlie's BOF summary in LPC2022.

Thanks,
Oded

2023-09-25 14:00:02

by Cancan Chang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: 回复: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)

Thank you for your reply from Jagan & Oded.

It is very appropritate for my driver to be placed in driver/accel.

My accelerator is named ADLA(Amlogic Deep Learning Accelerator).
It is an IP in SOC,mainly used for neural network models acceleration.
It will split and compile the neural network model into a private format cmd buffer,
and submit this cmd buffer to ADLA hardware. It is not programmable device.

ADLA includes four hardware engines:
RS engines : working for the reshape operators
MAC engines : working for the convolution operators
DW engines : working for the planer & Elementwise operators
Activation engines : working for activation operators(ReLu,tanh..)

By the way, my IP is mainly used for SOC, and the current driver registration is through the platform_driver,
is it necessary to switch to drm?

thanks.

________________________________________
发件人: Oded Gabbay <[email protected]>
发送时间: 2023年9月22日 23:08
收件人: Jagan Teki
抄送: Cancan Chang; linux-media; linux-kernel; Dave Airlie; Daniel Vetter
主题: Re: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)

[你通常不会收到来自 [email protected] 的电子邮件。请访问 https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification,以了解这一点为什么很重要]

[ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]

On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:38 PM Jagan Teki <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 15:04, Cancan Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Media Maintainers:
> > Thanks for your attention. Before describing my problem,let me introduce to you what I mean by NPU.
> > NPU is Neural Processing Unit, It is designed for deep learning acceleration, It is also called TPU, APU ..
> >
> > The real problems:
> > When I was about to upstream my NPU driver codes to linux mainline, i meet two problems:
> > 1. According to my research, There is no NPU module path in the linux (base on linux 6.5.4) , I have searched all linux projects and found no organization or comany that has submitted NPU code. Is there a path prepared for NPU driver currently?
> > 2. If there is no NPU driver path currently, I am going to put my NPU driver code in the drivers/media/platform/amlogic/ , because my NPU driver belongs to amlogic. and amlogic NPU is mainly used for AI vision applications. Is this plan suitabe for you?
>
> If I'm correct about the discussion with Oded Gabby before. I think
> the drivers/accel/ is proper for AI Accelerators including NPU.
>
> + Oded in case he can comment.
>
> Thanks,
> Jagan.
Thanks Jagan for adding me to this thread. Adding Dave & Daniel as well.

Indeed, the drivers/accel is the place for Accelerators, mainly for
AI/Deep-Learning accelerators.
We currently have 3 drivers there already.

The accel subsystem is part of the larger drm subsystem. Basically, to
get into accel, you need to integrate your driver with the drm at the
basic level (registering a device, hooking up with the proper
callbacks). ofc the more you use code from drm, the better.
You can take a look at the drivers under accel for some examples on
how to do that.

Could you please describe in a couple of sentences what your
accelerator does, which engines it contains, how you program it. i.e.
Is it a fixed-function device where you write to a couple of registers
to execute workloads, or is it a fully programmable device where you
load compiled code into it (GPU style) ?

For better background on the accel subsystem, please read the following:
https://docs.kernel.org/accel/introduction.html
This introduction also contains links to other important email threads
and to Dave Airlie's BOF summary in LPC2022.

Thanks,
Oded

2023-09-26 13:05:57

by Oded Gabbay

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:29 PM Cancan Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your reply from Jagan & Oded.
>
> It is very appropritate for my driver to be placed in driver/accel.
>
> My accelerator is named ADLA(Amlogic Deep Learning Accelerator).
> It is an IP in SOC,mainly used for neural network models acceleration.
> It will split and compile the neural network model into a private format cmd buffer,
> and submit this cmd buffer to ADLA hardware. It is not programmable device.
What exactly does it mean to "submit this cmd buffer to ADLA hardware" ?

Does your h/w provides queues for the user/driver to put their
workloads/cmd-bufs on them ? And does it provide some completion queue
to notify when the work is completed?

Or do you handle one cmd at a time, where the user sends a cmd buffer
to the driver and the driver then submit it by writing to a couple of
registers and polls on some status register until its done, or waits
for an interrupt to mark it as done ?

>
> ADLA includes four hardware engines:
> RS engines : working for the reshape operators
> MAC engines : working for the convolution operators
> DW engines : working for the planer & Elementwise operators
> Activation engines : working for activation operators(ReLu,tanh..)
>
> By the way, my IP is mainly used for SOC, and the current driver registration is through the platform_driver,
> is it necessary to switch to drm?
This probably depends on the answer to my question above. btw, there
are drivers in drm that handle IPs that are part of an SOC, so
platform_driver is supported.

Oded

>
> thanks.
>
> ________________________________________
> 发件人: Oded Gabbay <[email protected]>
> 发送时间: 2023年9月22日 23:08
> 收件人: Jagan Teki
> 抄送: Cancan Chang; linux-media; linux-kernel; Dave Airlie; Daniel Vetter
> 主题: Re: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)
>
> [你通常不会收到来自 [email protected] 的电子邮件。请访问 https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification,以了解这一点为什么很重要]
>
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:38 PM Jagan Teki <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 15:04, Cancan Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Media Maintainers:
> > > Thanks for your attention. Before describing my problem,let me introduce to you what I mean by NPU.
> > > NPU is Neural Processing Unit, It is designed for deep learning acceleration, It is also called TPU, APU ..
> > >
> > > The real problems:
> > > When I was about to upstream my NPU driver codes to linux mainline, i meet two problems:
> > > 1. According to my research, There is no NPU module path in the linux (base on linux 6.5.4) , I have searched all linux projects and found no organization or comany that has submitted NPU code. Is there a path prepared for NPU driver currently?
> > > 2. If there is no NPU driver path currently, I am going to put my NPU driver code in the drivers/media/platform/amlogic/ , because my NPU driver belongs to amlogic. and amlogic NPU is mainly used for AI vision applications. Is this plan suitabe for you?
> >
> > If I'm correct about the discussion with Oded Gabby before. I think
> > the drivers/accel/ is proper for AI Accelerators including NPU.
> >
> > + Oded in case he can comment.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jagan.
> Thanks Jagan for adding me to this thread. Adding Dave & Daniel as well.
>
> Indeed, the drivers/accel is the place for Accelerators, mainly for
> AI/Deep-Learning accelerators.
> We currently have 3 drivers there already.
>
> The accel subsystem is part of the larger drm subsystem. Basically, to
> get into accel, you need to integrate your driver with the drm at the
> basic level (registering a device, hooking up with the proper
> callbacks). ofc the more you use code from drm, the better.
> You can take a look at the drivers under accel for some examples on
> how to do that.
>
> Could you please describe in a couple of sentences what your
> accelerator does, which engines it contains, how you program it. i.e.
> Is it a fixed-function device where you write to a couple of registers
> to execute workloads, or is it a fully programmable device where you
> load compiled code into it (GPU style) ?
>
> For better background on the accel subsystem, please read the following:
> https://docs.kernel.org/accel/introduction.html
> This introduction also contains links to other important email threads
> and to Dave Airlie's BOF summary in LPC2022.
>
> Thanks,
> Oded

2023-09-27 09:43:16

by Cancan Chang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: 回复: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)

“Or do you handle one cmd at a time, where the user sends a cmd buffer
to the driver and the driver then submit it by writing to a couple of
registers and polls on some status register until its done, or waits
for an interrupt to mark it as done ?”
--- yes, user sends a cmd buffer to driver, and driver triggers hardware by writing to register,
and then, waits for an interrupt to mark it as done.

My current driver is very different from drm, so I want to know if I have to switch to drm?
Maybe I can refer to /driver/accel/habanalabs.

thanks

________________________________________
发件人: Oded Gabbay <[email protected]>
发送时间: 2023年9月26日 20:54
收件人: Cancan Chang
抄送: Jagan Teki; linux-media; linux-kernel; Dave Airlie; Daniel Vetter
主题: Re: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)

[ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:29 PM Cancan Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your reply from Jagan & Oded.
>
> It is very appropritate for my driver to be placed in driver/accel.
>
> My accelerator is named ADLA(Amlogic Deep Learning Accelerator).
> It is an IP in SOC,mainly used for neural network models acceleration.
> It will split and compile the neural network model into a private format cmd buffer,
> and submit this cmd buffer to ADLA hardware. It is not programmable device.
What exactly does it mean to "submit this cmd buffer to ADLA hardware" ?

Does your h/w provides queues for the user/driver to put their
workloads/cmd-bufs on them ? And does it provide some completion queue
to notify when the work is completed?

Or do you handle one cmd at a time, where the user sends a cmd buffer
to the driver and the driver then submit it by writing to a couple of
registers and polls on some status register until its done, or waits
for an interrupt to mark it as done ?

>
> ADLA includes four hardware engines:
> RS engines : working for the reshape operators
> MAC engines : working for the convolution operators
> DW engines : working for the planer & Elementwise operators
> Activation engines : working for activation operators(ReLu,tanh..)
>
> By the way, my IP is mainly used for SOC, and the current driver registration is through the platform_driver,
> is it necessary to switch to drm?
This probably depends on the answer to my question above. btw, there
are drivers in drm that handle IPs that are part of an SOC, so
platform_driver is supported.

Oded

>
> thanks.
>
> ________________________________________
> 发件人: Oded Gabbay <[email protected]>
> 发送时间: 2023年9月22日 23:08
> 收件人: Jagan Teki
> 抄送: Cancan Chang; linux-media; linux-kernel; Dave Airlie; Daniel Vetter
> 主题: Re: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)
>
> [你通常不会收到来自 [email protected] 的电子邮件。请访问 https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification,以了解这一点为什么很重要]
>
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:38 PM Jagan Teki <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 15:04, Cancan Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Media Maintainers:
> > > Thanks for your attention. Before describing my problem,let me introduce to you what I mean by NPU.
> > > NPU is Neural Processing Unit, It is designed for deep learning acceleration, It is also called TPU, APU ..
> > >
> > > The real problems:
> > > When I was about to upstream my NPU driver codes to linux mainline, i meet two problems:
> > > 1. According to my research, There is no NPU module path in the linux (base on linux 6.5.4) , I have searched all linux projects and found no organization or comany that has submitted NPU code. Is there a path prepared for NPU driver currently?
> > > 2. If there is no NPU driver path currently, I am going to put my NPU driver code in the drivers/media/platform/amlogic/ , because my NPU driver belongs to amlogic. and amlogic NPU is mainly used for AI vision applications. Is this plan suitabe for you?
> >
> > If I'm correct about the discussion with Oded Gabby before. I think
> > the drivers/accel/ is proper for AI Accelerators including NPU.
> >
> > + Oded in case he can comment.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jagan.
> Thanks Jagan for adding me to this thread. Adding Dave & Daniel as well.
>
> Indeed, the drivers/accel is the place for Accelerators, mainly for
> AI/Deep-Learning accelerators.
> We currently have 3 drivers there already.
>
> The accel subsystem is part of the larger drm subsystem. Basically, to
> get into accel, you need to integrate your driver with the drm at the
> basic level (registering a device, hooking up with the proper
> callbacks). ofc the more you use code from drm, the better.
> You can take a look at the drivers under accel for some examples on
> how to do that.
>
> Could you please describe in a couple of sentences what your
> accelerator does, which engines it contains, how you program it. i.e.
> Is it a fixed-function device where you write to a couple of registers
> to execute workloads, or is it a fully programmable device where you
> load compiled code into it (GPU style) ?
>
> For better background on the accel subsystem, please read the following:
> https://docs.kernel.org/accel/introduction.html
> This introduction also contains links to other important email threads
> and to Dave Airlie's BOF summary in LPC2022.
>
> Thanks,
> Oded

2023-09-28 05:41:08

by Oded Gabbay

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:01 AM Cancan Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> “Or do you handle one cmd at a time, where the user sends a cmd buffer
> to the driver and the driver then submit it by writing to a couple of
> registers and polls on some status register until its done, or waits
> for an interrupt to mark it as done ?”
> --- yes, user sends a cmd buffer to driver, and driver triggers hardware by writing to register,
> and then, waits for an interrupt to mark it as done.
>
> My current driver is very different from drm, so I want to know if I have to switch to drm?
Could you please post a link to the driver's source code ?
In addition, could you please elaborate which userspace libraries
exists that work with your driver ? Are any of them open-source ?

> Maybe I can refer to /driver/accel/habanalabs.
That's definitely a possibility.

Oded
>
> thanks
>
> ________________________________________
> 发件人: Oded Gabbay <[email protected]>
> 发送时间: 2023年9月26日 20:54
> 收件人: Cancan Chang
> 抄送: Jagan Teki; linux-media; linux-kernel; Dave Airlie; Daniel Vetter
> 主题: Re: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)
>
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:29 PM Cancan Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for your reply from Jagan & Oded.
> >
> > It is very appropritate for my driver to be placed in driver/accel.
> >
> > My accelerator is named ADLA(Amlogic Deep Learning Accelerator).
> > It is an IP in SOC,mainly used for neural network models acceleration.
> > It will split and compile the neural network model into a private format cmd buffer,
> > and submit this cmd buffer to ADLA hardware. It is not programmable device.
> What exactly does it mean to "submit this cmd buffer to ADLA hardware" ?
>
> Does your h/w provides queues for the user/driver to put their
> workloads/cmd-bufs on them ? And does it provide some completion queue
> to notify when the work is completed?
>
> Or do you handle one cmd at a time, where the user sends a cmd buffer
> to the driver and the driver then submit it by writing to a couple of
> registers and polls on some status register until its done, or waits
> for an interrupt to mark it as done ?
>
> >
> > ADLA includes four hardware engines:
> > RS engines : working for the reshape operators
> > MAC engines : working for the convolution operators
> > DW engines : working for the planer & Elementwise operators
> > Activation engines : working for activation operators(ReLu,tanh..)
> >
> > By the way, my IP is mainly used for SOC, and the current driver registration is through the platform_driver,
> > is it necessary to switch to drm?
> This probably depends on the answer to my question above. btw, there
> are drivers in drm that handle IPs that are part of an SOC, so
> platform_driver is supported.
>
> Oded
>
> >
> > thanks.
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > 发件人: Oded Gabbay <[email protected]>
> > 发送时间: 2023年9月22日 23:08
> > 收件人: Jagan Teki
> > 抄送: Cancan Chang; linux-media; linux-kernel; Dave Airlie; Daniel Vetter
> > 主题: Re: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)
> >
> > [你通常不会收到来自 [email protected] 的电子邮件。请访问 https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification,以了解这一点为什么很重要]
> >
> > [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:38 PM Jagan Teki <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 15:04, Cancan Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Media Maintainers:
> > > > Thanks for your attention. Before describing my problem,let me introduce to you what I mean by NPU.
> > > > NPU is Neural Processing Unit, It is designed for deep learning acceleration, It is also called TPU, APU ..
> > > >
> > > > The real problems:
> > > > When I was about to upstream my NPU driver codes to linux mainline, i meet two problems:
> > > > 1. According to my research, There is no NPU module path in the linux (base on linux 6.5.4) , I have searched all linux projects and found no organization or comany that has submitted NPU code. Is there a path prepared for NPU driver currently?
> > > > 2. If there is no NPU driver path currently, I am going to put my NPU driver code in the drivers/media/platform/amlogic/ , because my NPU driver belongs to amlogic. and amlogic NPU is mainly used for AI vision applications. Is this plan suitabe for you?
> > >
> > > If I'm correct about the discussion with Oded Gabby before. I think
> > > the drivers/accel/ is proper for AI Accelerators including NPU.
> > >
> > > + Oded in case he can comment.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jagan.
> > Thanks Jagan for adding me to this thread. Adding Dave & Daniel as well.
> >
> > Indeed, the drivers/accel is the place for Accelerators, mainly for
> > AI/Deep-Learning accelerators.
> > We currently have 3 drivers there already.
> >
> > The accel subsystem is part of the larger drm subsystem. Basically, to
> > get into accel, you need to integrate your driver with the drm at the
> > basic level (registering a device, hooking up with the proper
> > callbacks). ofc the more you use code from drm, the better.
> > You can take a look at the drivers under accel for some examples on
> > how to do that.
> >
> > Could you please describe in a couple of sentences what your
> > accelerator does, which engines it contains, how you program it. i.e.
> > Is it a fixed-function device where you write to a couple of registers
> > to execute workloads, or is it a fully programmable device where you
> > load compiled code into it (GPU style) ?
> >
> > For better background on the accel subsystem, please read the following:
> > https://docs.kernel.org/accel/introduction.html
> > This introduction also contains links to other important email threads
> > and to Dave Airlie's BOF summary in LPC2022.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Oded

2023-09-28 19:59:29

by Cancan Chang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: 回复: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)

“Could you please post a link to the driver's source code ?
In addition, could you please elaborate which userspace libraries
exists that work with your driver ? Are any of them open-source ?”
--- We will prepare the adla driver link after the holiday on October 6th.
It's a pity that there is no open-source userspace library.
But you can probably understand it through a workflow, which can be simplified as:
1. create model context
ret = ioctl(context->fd, ADLAK_IOCTL_REGISTER_NETWORK, &desc);
2. set inputs
3. inference
ret = ioctl(context->fd, ADLAK_IOCTL_INVOKE, &invoke_dec);
4. wait for the inference to complete
ret = ioctl(context->fd, ADLAK_IOCTL_WAIT_UNTIL_FINISH, &stat_req_desc);
5. destroy model context
ret = ioctl(context->fd, ADLAK_IOCTL_DESTROY_NETWORK, &submit_del);


thanks


________________________________________
发件人: Oded Gabbay <[email protected]>
发送时间: 2023年9月28日 13:28
收件人: Cancan Chang
抄送: Jagan Teki; linux-media; linux-kernel; Dave Airlie; Daniel Vetter
主题: Re: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)

[ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:01 AM Cancan Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> “Or do you handle one cmd at a time, where the user sends a cmd buffer
> to the driver and the driver then submit it by writing to a couple of
> registers and polls on some status register until its done, or waits
> for an interrupt to mark it as done ?”
> --- yes, user sends a cmd buffer to driver, and driver triggers hardware by writing to register,
> and then, waits for an interrupt to mark it as done.
>
> My current driver is very different from drm, so I want to know if I have to switch to drm?
Could you please post a link to the driver's source code ?
In addition, could you please elaborate which userspace libraries
exists that work with your driver ? Are any of them open-source ?

> Maybe I can refer to /driver/accel/habanalabs.
That's definitely a possibility.

Oded
>
> thanks
>
> ________________________________________
> 发件人: Oded Gabbay <[email protected]>
> 发送时间: 2023年9月26日 20:54
> 收件人: Cancan Chang
> 抄送: Jagan Teki; linux-media; linux-kernel; Dave Airlie; Daniel Vetter
> 主题: Re: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)
>
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 12:29 PM Cancan Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for your reply from Jagan & Oded.
> >
> > It is very appropritate for my driver to be placed in driver/accel.
> >
> > My accelerator is named ADLA(Amlogic Deep Learning Accelerator).
> > It is an IP in SOC,mainly used for neural network models acceleration.
> > It will split and compile the neural network model into a private format cmd buffer,
> > and submit this cmd buffer to ADLA hardware. It is not programmable device.
> What exactly does it mean to "submit this cmd buffer to ADLA hardware" ?
>
> Does your h/w provides queues for the user/driver to put their
> workloads/cmd-bufs on them ? And does it provide some completion queue
> to notify when the work is completed?
>
> Or do you handle one cmd at a time, where the user sends a cmd buffer
> to the driver and the driver then submit it by writing to a couple of
> registers and polls on some status register until its done, or waits
> for an interrupt to mark it as done ?
>
> >
> > ADLA includes four hardware engines:
> > RS engines : working for the reshape operators
> > MAC engines : working for the convolution operators
> > DW engines : working for the planer & Elementwise operators
> > Activation engines : working for activation operators(ReLu,tanh..)
> >
> > By the way, my IP is mainly used for SOC, and the current driver registration is through the platform_driver,
> > is it necessary to switch to drm?
> This probably depends on the answer to my question above. btw, there
> are drivers in drm that handle IPs that are part of an SOC, so
> platform_driver is supported.
>
> Oded
>
> >
> > thanks.
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > 发件人: Oded Gabbay <[email protected]>
> > 发送时间: 2023年9月22日 23:08
> > 收件人: Jagan Teki
> > 抄送: Cancan Chang; linux-media; linux-kernel; Dave Airlie; Daniel Vetter
> > 主题: Re: kernel.org 6.5.4 , NPU driver, --not support (RFC)
> >
> > [你通常不会收到来自 [email protected] 的电子邮件。请访问 https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification,以了解这一点为什么很重要]
> >
> > [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:38 PM Jagan Teki <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 15:04, Cancan Chang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Media Maintainers:
> > > > Thanks for your attention. Before describing my problem,let me introduce to you what I mean by NPU.
> > > > NPU is Neural Processing Unit, It is designed for deep learning acceleration, It is also called TPU, APU ..
> > > >
> > > > The real problems:
> > > > When I was about to upstream my NPU driver codes to linux mainline, i meet two problems:
> > > > 1. According to my research, There is no NPU module path in the linux (base on linux 6.5.4) , I have searched all linux projects and found no organization or comany that has submitted NPU code. Is there a path prepared for NPU driver currently?
> > > > 2. If there is no NPU driver path currently, I am going to put my NPU driver code in the drivers/media/platform/amlogic/ , because my NPU driver belongs to amlogic. and amlogic NPU is mainly used for AI vision applications. Is this plan suitabe for you?
> > >
> > > If I'm correct about the discussion with Oded Gabby before. I think
> > > the drivers/accel/ is proper for AI Accelerators including NPU.
> > >
> > > + Oded in case he can comment.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jagan.
> > Thanks Jagan for adding me to this thread. Adding Dave & Daniel as well.
> >
> > Indeed, the drivers/accel is the place for Accelerators, mainly for
> > AI/Deep-Learning accelerators.
> > We currently have 3 drivers there already.
> >
> > The accel subsystem is part of the larger drm subsystem. Basically, to
> > get into accel, you need to integrate your driver with the drm at the
> > basic level (registering a device, hooking up with the proper
> > callbacks). ofc the more you use code from drm, the better.
> > You can take a look at the drivers under accel for some examples on
> > how to do that.
> >
> > Could you please describe in a couple of sentences what your
> > accelerator does, which engines it contains, how you program it. i.e.
> > Is it a fixed-function device where you write to a couple of registers
> > to execute workloads, or is it a fully programmable device where you
> > load compiled code into it (GPU style) ?
> >
> > For better background on the accel subsystem, please read the following:
> > https://docs.kernel.org/accel/introduction.html
> > This introduction also contains links to other important email threads
> > and to Dave Airlie's BOF summary in LPC2022.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Oded