Currently the following expectation
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "hi", "bye");
will produce:
Expected "hi" == "bye", but
"hi" == 1625079497
"bye" == 1625079500
After this patch:
Expected "hi" == "bye", but
"hi" == hi
"bye" == bye
KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERT_STRUCT() was written but just mistakenly
not actually used by KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() and friends.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <[email protected]>
---
include/kunit/test.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index 9197da792336..2c1553105958 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ do { \
KUNIT_ASSERTION(test, \
strcmp(__left, __right) op 0, \
kunit_binary_str_assert, \
- KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_ASSERT_STRUCT(test, \
+ KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERT_STRUCT(test, \
assert_type, \
#op, \
#left, \
base-commit: 495023e4e49e4b7dee35928800bf0317276576c1
--
2.29.1.341.ge80a0c044ae-goog
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 3:23 PM Daniel Latypov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Currently the following expectation
> KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "hi", "bye");
> will produce:
> Expected "hi" == "bye", but
> "hi" == 1625079497
> "bye" == 1625079500
>
> After this patch:
> Expected "hi" == "bye", but
> "hi" == hi
> "bye" == bye
>
> KUNIT_INIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERT_STRUCT() was written but just mistakenly
> not actually used by KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ() and friends.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <[email protected]>