2014-06-30 23:30:24

by Luis Chamberlain

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] firmware loader: inform direct failure when udev loader is disabled

From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[email protected]>

Now that the udev firmware loader is optional request_firmware()
will not provide any information on the kernel ring buffer if
direct firmware loading failed and udev firmware loading is disabled.
If no information is needed request_firmware_direct() should be used
for optional firmware, at which point drivers can take on the onus
over informing of any failures, if udev firmware loading is disabled
though we should at the very least provide some sort of information
as when the udev loader was enabled by default back in the days.

With this change with a simple firmware load test module [0]:

Example output without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK

platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load for fake.bin failed with error -2

Example without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK

platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load for fake.bin failed with error -2
platform fake-dev.0: Falling back to user helper

Without this change without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK we get no output
logged upon failure.

[0] https://github.com/mcgrof/fake-firmware-test.git

Cc: Tom Gundersen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Abhay Salunke <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>
---

drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
index 46ea5f4..23274d8 100644
--- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
+++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
@@ -101,8 +101,10 @@ static inline long firmware_loading_timeout(void)
#define FW_OPT_NOWAIT (1U << 1)
#ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER
#define FW_OPT_USERHELPER (1U << 2)
+#define FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN 0
#else
#define FW_OPT_USERHELPER 0
+#define FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN (1U << 3)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
#define FW_OPT_FALLBACK FW_OPT_USERHELPER
@@ -1116,10 +1118,11 @@ _request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,

ret = fw_get_filesystem_firmware(device, fw->priv);
if (ret) {
- if (opt_flags & FW_OPT_USERHELPER) {
+ if (opt_flags & (FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN | FW_OPT_USERHELPER))
dev_warn(device,
- "Direct firmware load failed with error %d\n",
- ret);
+ "Direct firmware load for %s failed with error %d\n",
+ name, ret);
+ if (opt_flags & FW_OPT_USERHELPER) {
dev_warn(device, "Falling back to user helper\n");
ret = fw_load_from_user_helper(fw, name, device,
opt_flags, timeout);
@@ -1170,7 +1173,8 @@ request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
/* Need to pin this module until return */
__module_get(THIS_MODULE);
ret = _request_firmware(firmware_p, name, device,
- FW_OPT_UEVENT | FW_OPT_FALLBACK);
+ FW_OPT_UEVENT | FW_OPT_FALLBACK |
+ FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN);
module_put(THIS_MODULE);
return ret;
}
--
2.0.0


2014-07-01 03:54:28

by Ming Lei

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware loader: inform direct failure when udev loader is disabled

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
<[email protected]> wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[email protected]>
>
> Now that the udev firmware loader is optional request_firmware()
> will not provide any information on the kernel ring buffer if
> direct firmware loading failed and udev firmware loading is disabled.
> If no information is needed request_firmware_direct() should be used
> for optional firmware, at which point drivers can take on the onus
> over informing of any failures, if udev firmware loading is disabled
> though we should at the very least provide some sort of information
> as when the udev loader was enabled by default back in the days.
>
> With this change with a simple firmware load test module [0]:
>
> Example output without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
>
> platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load for fake.bin failed with error -2
>
> Example without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
>
> platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load for fake.bin failed with error -2
> platform fake-dev.0: Falling back to user helper
>
> Without this change without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK we get no output
> logged upon failure.
>
> [0] https://github.com/mcgrof/fake-firmware-test.git
>
> Cc: Tom Gundersen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
> Cc: Abhay Salunke <[email protected]>
> Cc: Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
> Cc: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> index 46ea5f4..23274d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> @@ -101,8 +101,10 @@ static inline long firmware_loading_timeout(void)
> #define FW_OPT_NOWAIT (1U << 1)
> #ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER
> #define FW_OPT_USERHELPER (1U << 2)
> +#define FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN 0
> #else
> #define FW_OPT_USERHELPER 0
> +#define FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN (1U << 3)
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
> #define FW_OPT_FALLBACK FW_OPT_USERHELPER
> @@ -1116,10 +1118,11 @@ _request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
>
> ret = fw_get_filesystem_firmware(device, fw->priv);
> if (ret) {
> - if (opt_flags & FW_OPT_USERHELPER) {
> + if (opt_flags & (FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN | FW_OPT_USERHELPER))
> dev_warn(device,
> - "Direct firmware load failed with error %d\n",
> - ret);
> + "Direct firmware load for %s failed with error %d\n",
> + name, ret);

Maybe the warning can be always printed out since
(FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN | FW_OPT_USERHELPER) should be
always true.


Thanks,
--
Ming Lei

2014-07-01 07:24:00

by Tom Gundersen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware loader: inform direct failure when udev loader is disabled

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
<[email protected]> wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[email protected]>
>
> Now that the udev firmware loader is optional request_firmware()
> will not provide any information on the kernel ring buffer if
> direct firmware loading failed and udev firmware loading is disabled.
> If no information is needed request_firmware_direct() should be used
> for optional firmware, at which point drivers can take on the onus
> over informing of any failures, if udev firmware loading is disabled
> though we should at the very least provide some sort of information
> as when the udev loader was enabled by default back in the days.
>
> With this change with a simple firmware load test module [0]:
>
> Example output without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
>
> platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load for fake.bin failed with error -2
>
> Example without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK

This ^^ should be "Example output with [...]" ?

Otherwise looks good, so:

Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <[email protected]>

> platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load for fake.bin failed with error -2
> platform fake-dev.0: Falling back to user helper
>
> Without this change without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK we get no output
> logged upon failure.
>
> [0] https://github.com/mcgrof/fake-firmware-test.git
>
> Cc: Tom Gundersen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
> Cc: Abhay Salunke <[email protected]>
> Cc: Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
> Cc: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> index 46ea5f4..23274d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> @@ -101,8 +101,10 @@ static inline long firmware_loading_timeout(void)
> #define FW_OPT_NOWAIT (1U << 1)
> #ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER
> #define FW_OPT_USERHELPER (1U << 2)
> +#define FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN 0
> #else
> #define FW_OPT_USERHELPER 0
> +#define FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN (1U << 3)
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
> #define FW_OPT_FALLBACK FW_OPT_USERHELPER
> @@ -1116,10 +1118,11 @@ _request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
>
> ret = fw_get_filesystem_firmware(device, fw->priv);
> if (ret) {
> - if (opt_flags & FW_OPT_USERHELPER) {
> + if (opt_flags & (FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN | FW_OPT_USERHELPER))
> dev_warn(device,
> - "Direct firmware load failed with error %d\n",
> - ret);
> + "Direct firmware load for %s failed with error %d\n",
> + name, ret);
> + if (opt_flags & FW_OPT_USERHELPER) {
> dev_warn(device, "Falling back to user helper\n");
> ret = fw_load_from_user_helper(fw, name, device,
> opt_flags, timeout);
> @@ -1170,7 +1173,8 @@ request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
> /* Need to pin this module until return */
> __module_get(THIS_MODULE);
> ret = _request_firmware(firmware_p, name, device,
> - FW_OPT_UEVENT | FW_OPT_FALLBACK);
> + FW_OPT_UEVENT | FW_OPT_FALLBACK |
> + FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN);
> module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.0.0
>

2014-07-01 09:22:12

by Takashi Iwai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware loader: inform direct failure when udev loader is disabled

At Tue, 1 Jul 2014 11:54:24 +0800,
Ming Lei wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[email protected]>
> >
> > Now that the udev firmware loader is optional request_firmware()
> > will not provide any information on the kernel ring buffer if
> > direct firmware loading failed and udev firmware loading is disabled.
> > If no information is needed request_firmware_direct() should be used
> > for optional firmware, at which point drivers can take on the onus
> > over informing of any failures, if udev firmware loading is disabled
> > though we should at the very least provide some sort of information
> > as when the udev loader was enabled by default back in the days.
> >
> > With this change with a simple firmware load test module [0]:
> >
> > Example output without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
> >
> > platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load for fake.bin failed with error -2
> >
> > Example without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
> >
> > platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load for fake.bin failed with error -2
> > platform fake-dev.0: Falling back to user helper
> >
> > Without this change without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK we get no output
> > logged upon failure.
> >
> > [0] https://github.com/mcgrof/fake-firmware-test.git
> >
> > Cc: Tom Gundersen <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Abhay Salunke <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 12 ++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > index 46ea5f4..23274d8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > @@ -101,8 +101,10 @@ static inline long firmware_loading_timeout(void)
> > #define FW_OPT_NOWAIT (1U << 1)
> > #ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER
> > #define FW_OPT_USERHELPER (1U << 2)
> > +#define FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN 0
> > #else
> > #define FW_OPT_USERHELPER 0
> > +#define FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN (1U << 3)
> > #endif
> > #ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
> > #define FW_OPT_FALLBACK FW_OPT_USERHELPER
> > @@ -1116,10 +1118,11 @@ _request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
> >
> > ret = fw_get_filesystem_firmware(device, fw->priv);
> > if (ret) {
> > - if (opt_flags & FW_OPT_USERHELPER) {
> > + if (opt_flags & (FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN | FW_OPT_USERHELPER))
> > dev_warn(device,
> > - "Direct firmware load failed with error %d\n",
> > - ret);
> > + "Direct firmware load for %s failed with error %d\n",
> > + name, ret);
>
> Maybe the warning can be always printed out since
> (FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN | FW_OPT_USERHELPER) should be
> always true.

Yes, it'd be simpler. Let's reduce lines! :)


Takashi

2014-07-02 01:01:22

by Luis Chamberlain

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware loader: inform direct failure when udev loader is disabled

On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:22:07AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 1 Jul 2014 11:54:24 +0800,
> Ming Lei wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Now that the udev firmware loader is optional request_firmware()
> > > will not provide any information on the kernel ring buffer if
> > > direct firmware loading failed and udev firmware loading is disabled.
> > > If no information is needed request_firmware_direct() should be used
> > > for optional firmware, at which point drivers can take on the onus
> > > over informing of any failures, if udev firmware loading is disabled
> > > though we should at the very least provide some sort of information
> > > as when the udev loader was enabled by default back in the days.
> > >
> > > With this change with a simple firmware load test module [0]:
> > >
> > > Example output without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
> > >
> > > platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load for fake.bin failed with error -2
> > >
> > > Example without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
> > >
> > > platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load for fake.bin failed with error -2
> > > platform fake-dev.0: Falling back to user helper
> > >
> > > Without this change without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK we get no output
> > > logged upon failure.
> > >
> > > [0] https://github.com/mcgrof/fake-firmware-test.git
> > >
> > > Cc: Tom Gundersen <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Abhay Salunke <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 12 ++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > > index 46ea5f4..23274d8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > > @@ -101,8 +101,10 @@ static inline long firmware_loading_timeout(void)
> > > #define FW_OPT_NOWAIT (1U << 1)
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER
> > > #define FW_OPT_USERHELPER (1U << 2)
> > > +#define FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN 0
> > > #else
> > > #define FW_OPT_USERHELPER 0
> > > +#define FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN (1U << 3)
> > > #endif
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
> > > #define FW_OPT_FALLBACK FW_OPT_USERHELPER
> > > @@ -1116,10 +1118,11 @@ _request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
> > >
> > > ret = fw_get_filesystem_firmware(device, fw->priv);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > - if (opt_flags & FW_OPT_USERHELPER) {
> > > + if (opt_flags & (FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN | FW_OPT_USERHELPER))
> > > dev_warn(device,
> > > - "Direct firmware load failed with error %d\n",
> > > - ret);
> > > + "Direct firmware load for %s failed with error %d\n",
> > > + name, ret);
> >
> > Maybe the warning can be always printed out since
> > (FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN | FW_OPT_USERHELPER) should be
> > always true.
>
> Yes, it'd be simpler. Let's reduce lines! :)

Actually we don't want to warn when request_firmware_direct() is used right? That's really what
I meant to upkeep while adding a warning when _direct() is not used. So how about
this as an ammendment:

diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
index 23274d8..4f6adf3 100644
--- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
+++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
@@ -1180,7 +1180,6 @@ request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_firmware);

-#ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
/**
* request_firmware: - load firmware directly without usermode helper
* @firmware_p: pointer to firmware image
@@ -1202,7 +1201,6 @@ int request_firmware_direct(const struct firmware **firmware_p,
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_firmware_direct);
-#endif

/**
* release_firmware: - release the resource associated with a firmware image
diff --git a/include/linux/firmware.h b/include/linux/firmware.h
index 67e5b80..5c41c5e 100644
--- a/include/linux/firmware.h
+++ b/include/linux/firmware.h
@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ int request_firmware_nowait(
struct module *module, bool uevent,
const char *name, struct device *device, gfp_t gfp, void *context,
void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context));
+int request_firmware_direct(const struct firmware **fw, const char *name,
+ struct device *device);

void release_firmware(const struct firmware *fw);
#else
@@ -66,13 +68,12 @@ static inline void release_firmware(const struct firmware *fw)
{
}

-#endif
+static inline int request_firmware_direct(const struct firmware **fw,
+ const char *name,
+ struct device *device)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}

-#ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
-int request_firmware_direct(const struct firmware **fw, const char *name,
- struct device *device);
-#else
-#define request_firmware_direct request_firmware
#endif
-
#endif

2014-07-02 01:51:40

by Ming Lei

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware loader: inform direct failure when udev loader is disabled

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:22:07AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> At Tue, 1 Jul 2014 11:54:24 +0800,
>> Ming Lei wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[email protected]>
>> > >
>> > > Now that the udev firmware loader is optional request_firmware()
>> > > will not provide any information on the kernel ring buffer if
>> > > direct firmware loading failed and udev firmware loading is disabled.
>> > > If no information is needed request_firmware_direct() should be used
>> > > for optional firmware, at which point drivers can take on the onus
>> > > over informing of any failures, if udev firmware loading is disabled
>> > > though we should at the very least provide some sort of information
>> > > as when the udev loader was enabled by default back in the days.
>> > >
>> > > With this change with a simple firmware load test module [0]:
>> > >
>> > > Example output without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
>> > >
>> > > platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load for fake.bin failed with error -2
>> > >
>> > > Example without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
>> > >
>> > > platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load for fake.bin failed with error -2
>> > > platform fake-dev.0: Falling back to user helper
>> > >
>> > > Without this change without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK we get no output
>> > > logged upon failure.
>> > >
>> > > [0] https://github.com/mcgrof/fake-firmware-test.git
>> > >
>> > > Cc: Tom Gundersen <[email protected]>
>> > > Cc: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
>> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
>> > > Cc: Abhay Salunke <[email protected]>
>> > > Cc: Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
>> > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>> > > Cc: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
>> > > Cc: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>
>> > > ---
>> > >
>> > > drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 12 ++++++++----
>> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
>> > > index 46ea5f4..23274d8 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
>> > > @@ -101,8 +101,10 @@ static inline long firmware_loading_timeout(void)
>> > > #define FW_OPT_NOWAIT (1U << 1)
>> > > #ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER
>> > > #define FW_OPT_USERHELPER (1U << 2)
>> > > +#define FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN 0
>> > > #else
>> > > #define FW_OPT_USERHELPER 0
>> > > +#define FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN (1U << 3)
>> > > #endif
>> > > #ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
>> > > #define FW_OPT_FALLBACK FW_OPT_USERHELPER
>> > > @@ -1116,10 +1118,11 @@ _request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
>> > >
>> > > ret = fw_get_filesystem_firmware(device, fw->priv);
>> > > if (ret) {
>> > > - if (opt_flags & FW_OPT_USERHELPER) {
>> > > + if (opt_flags & (FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN | FW_OPT_USERHELPER))
>> > > dev_warn(device,
>> > > - "Direct firmware load failed with error %d\n",
>> > > - ret);
>> > > + "Direct firmware load for %s failed with error %d\n",
>> > > + name, ret);
>> >
>> > Maybe the warning can be always printed out since
>> > (FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN | FW_OPT_USERHELPER) should be
>> > always true.
>>
>> Yes, it'd be simpler. Let's reduce lines! :)
>
> Actually we don't want to warn when request_firmware_direct() is used right? That's really what

Yes, that is for the CPU microcode update in which it is common to
fail in direct loading, and x86 guys hate the warning.

> I meant to upkeep while adding a warning when _direct() is not used. So how about
> this as an ammendment:

Yes, the idea is right, and it is good to make request_firmware_direct()
not depend on CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER, and with
one FW_OPT_DIRECT_ONLY flag together it should work.

>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> index 23274d8..4f6adf3 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> @@ -1180,7 +1180,6 @@ request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_firmware);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
> /**
> * request_firmware: - load firmware directly without usermode helper
> * @firmware_p: pointer to firmware image
> @@ -1202,7 +1201,6 @@ int request_firmware_direct(const struct firmware **firmware_p,
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_firmware_direct);
> -#endif
>
> /**
> * release_firmware: - release the resource associated with a firmware image
> diff --git a/include/linux/firmware.h b/include/linux/firmware.h
> index 67e5b80..5c41c5e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/firmware.h
> +++ b/include/linux/firmware.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ int request_firmware_nowait(
> struct module *module, bool uevent,
> const char *name, struct device *device, gfp_t gfp, void *context,
> void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context));
> +int request_firmware_direct(const struct firmware **fw, const char *name,
> + struct device *device);
>
> void release_firmware(const struct firmware *fw);
> #else
> @@ -66,13 +68,12 @@ static inline void release_firmware(const struct firmware *fw)
> {
> }
>
> -#endif
> +static inline int request_firmware_direct(const struct firmware **fw,
> + const char *name,
> + struct device *device)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}

You define two request_firmware_direct?

>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
> -int request_firmware_direct(const struct firmware **fw, const char *name,
> - struct device *device);
> -#else
> -#define request_firmware_direct request_firmware
> #endif
> -
> #endif

2014-07-02 02:34:53

by Luis Chamberlain

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware loader: inform direct failure when udev loader is disabled

On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:51:36AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:22:07AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >> At Tue, 1 Jul 2014 11:54:24 +0800,
> >> Ming Lei wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[email protected]>
> >> > >
> >> > > Now that the udev firmware loader is optional request_firmware()
> >> > > will not provide any information on the kernel ring buffer if
> >> > > direct firmware loading failed and udev firmware loading is disabled.
> >> > > If no information is needed request_firmware_direct() should be used
> >> > > for optional firmware, at which point drivers can take on the onus
> >> > > over informing of any failures, if udev firmware loading is disabled
> >> > > though we should at the very least provide some sort of information
> >> > > as when the udev loader was enabled by default back in the days.
> >> > >
> >> > > With this change with a simple firmware load test module [0]:
> >> > >
> >> > > Example output without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
> >> > >
> >> > > platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load for fake.bin failed with error -2
> >> > >
> >> > > Example without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
> >> > >
> >> > > platform fake-dev.0: Direct firmware load for fake.bin failed with error -2
> >> > > platform fake-dev.0: Falling back to user helper
> >> > >
> >> > > Without this change without FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK we get no output
> >> > > logged upon failure.
> >> > >
> >> > > [0] https://github.com/mcgrof/fake-firmware-test.git
> >> > >
> >> > > Cc: Tom Gundersen <[email protected]>
> >> > > Cc: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
> >> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
> >> > > Cc: Abhay Salunke <[email protected]>
> >> > > Cc: Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
> >> > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> >> > > Cc: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
> >> > > Cc: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]>
> >> > > ---
> >> > >
> >> > > drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 12 ++++++++----
> >> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> > >
> >> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> >> > > index 46ea5f4..23274d8 100644
> >> > > --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> >> > > +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> >> > > @@ -101,8 +101,10 @@ static inline long firmware_loading_timeout(void)
> >> > > #define FW_OPT_NOWAIT (1U << 1)
> >> > > #ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER
> >> > > #define FW_OPT_USERHELPER (1U << 2)
> >> > > +#define FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN 0
> >> > > #else
> >> > > #define FW_OPT_USERHELPER 0
> >> > > +#define FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN (1U << 3)
> >> > > #endif
> >> > > #ifdef CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK
> >> > > #define FW_OPT_FALLBACK FW_OPT_USERHELPER
> >> > > @@ -1116,10 +1118,11 @@ _request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
> >> > >
> >> > > ret = fw_get_filesystem_firmware(device, fw->priv);
> >> > > if (ret) {
> >> > > - if (opt_flags & FW_OPT_USERHELPER) {
> >> > > + if (opt_flags & (FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN | FW_OPT_USERHELPER))
> >> > > dev_warn(device,
> >> > > - "Direct firmware load failed with error %d\n",
> >> > > - ret);
> >> > > + "Direct firmware load for %s failed with error %d\n",
> >> > > + name, ret);
> >> >
> >> > Maybe the warning can be always printed out since
> >> > (FW_OPT_FAIL_WARN | FW_OPT_USERHELPER) should be
> >> > always true.
> >>
> >> Yes, it'd be simpler. Let's reduce lines! :)
> >
> > Actually we don't want to warn when request_firmware_direct() is used right? That's really what
>
> Yes, that is for the CPU microcode update in which it is common to
> fail in direct loading, and x86 guys hate the warning.

I've extended use of request_firmware_direct() to drivers that also load
non-firmware but optional config files, EEPROM override, etc.

> > I meant to upkeep while adding a warning when _direct() is not used. So how about
> > this as an ammendment:
>
> Yes, the idea is right, and it is good to make request_firmware_direct()
> not depend on CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER, and with
> one FW_OPT_DIRECT_ONLY flag together it should work.

OK.

> > diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > index 23274d8..4f6adf3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> > @@ -66,13 +68,12 @@ static inline void release_firmware(const struct firmware *fw)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > -#endif
> > +static inline int request_firmware_direct(const struct firmware **fw,
> > + const char *name,
> > + struct device *device)
> > +{
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
>
> You define two request_firmware_direct?

This is the negative of

#if defined(CONFIG_FW_LOADER) || (defined(CONFIG_FW_LOADER_MODULE) && defined(MODULE))

We have two also for request_firmware().

Will send out a v2.

Luis