2021-12-29 08:58:52

by Christophe JAILLET

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: sn65dsi83: Fix an error handling path in sn65dsi83_probe()

sn65dsi83_parse_dt() takes a reference on 'ctx->host_node' that must be
released in the error handling path of this function and of the probe.
This is only done in the remove function up to now.

Fixes: ceb515ba29ba ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add TI SN65DSI83 and SN65DSI84 driver")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
---
v2: add error handling in sn65dsi83_parse_dt() [Laurent Pinchart]
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
index 945f08de45f1..314a84ffcea3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
@@ -560,10 +560,14 @@ static int sn65dsi83_parse_dt(struct sn65dsi83 *ctx, enum sn65dsi83_model model)
ctx->host_node = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(endpoint);
of_node_put(endpoint);

- if (ctx->dsi_lanes < 0 || ctx->dsi_lanes > 4)
- return -EINVAL;
- if (!ctx->host_node)
- return -ENODEV;
+ if (ctx->dsi_lanes < 0 || ctx->dsi_lanes > 4) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_put_node;
+ }
+ if (!ctx->host_node) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto err_put_node;
+ }

ctx->lvds_dual_link = false;
ctx->lvds_dual_link_even_odd_swap = false;
@@ -590,16 +594,22 @@ static int sn65dsi83_parse_dt(struct sn65dsi83 *ctx, enum sn65dsi83_model model)

ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dev->of_node, 2, 0, &panel, &panel_bridge);
if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ goto err_put_node;
if (panel) {
panel_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dev, panel);
- if (IS_ERR(panel_bridge))
- return PTR_ERR(panel_bridge);
+ if (IS_ERR(panel_bridge)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(panel_bridge);
+ goto err_put_node;
+ }
}

ctx->panel_bridge = panel_bridge;

return 0;
+
+err_put_node:
+ of_node_put(ctx->host_node);
+ return ret;
}

static int sn65dsi83_host_attach(struct sn65dsi83 *ctx)
@@ -673,8 +683,10 @@ static int sn65dsi83_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
return ret;

ctx->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &sn65dsi83_regmap_config);
- if (IS_ERR(ctx->regmap))
- return PTR_ERR(ctx->regmap);
+ if (IS_ERR(ctx->regmap)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(ctx->regmap);
+ goto err_put_node;
+ }

dev_set_drvdata(dev, ctx);
i2c_set_clientdata(client, ctx);
@@ -691,6 +703,8 @@ static int sn65dsi83_probe(struct i2c_client *client,

err_remove_bridge:
drm_bridge_remove(&ctx->bridge);
+err_put_node:
+ of_node_put(ctx->host_node);
return ret;
}

--
2.32.0



2021-12-29 16:10:56

by Laurent Pinchart

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: sn65dsi83: Fix an error handling path in sn65dsi83_probe()

Hi Christophe,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 09:58:44AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> sn65dsi83_parse_dt() takes a reference on 'ctx->host_node' that must be
> released in the error handling path of this function and of the probe.
> This is only done in the remove function up to now.
>
> Fixes: ceb515ba29ba ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add TI SN65DSI83 and SN65DSI84 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>

> ---
> v2: add error handling in sn65dsi83_parse_dt() [Laurent Pinchart]
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> index 945f08de45f1..314a84ffcea3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> @@ -560,10 +560,14 @@ static int sn65dsi83_parse_dt(struct sn65dsi83 *ctx, enum sn65dsi83_model model)
> ctx->host_node = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(endpoint);
> of_node_put(endpoint);
>
> - if (ctx->dsi_lanes < 0 || ctx->dsi_lanes > 4)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - if (!ctx->host_node)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + if (ctx->dsi_lanes < 0 || ctx->dsi_lanes > 4) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_put_node;
> + }
> + if (!ctx->host_node) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_put_node;
> + }
>
> ctx->lvds_dual_link = false;
> ctx->lvds_dual_link_even_odd_swap = false;
> @@ -590,16 +594,22 @@ static int sn65dsi83_parse_dt(struct sn65dsi83 *ctx, enum sn65dsi83_model model)
>
> ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dev->of_node, 2, 0, &panel, &panel_bridge);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto err_put_node;
> if (panel) {
> panel_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(dev, panel);
> - if (IS_ERR(panel_bridge))
> - return PTR_ERR(panel_bridge);
> + if (IS_ERR(panel_bridge)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(panel_bridge);
> + goto err_put_node;
> + }
> }
>
> ctx->panel_bridge = panel_bridge;
>
> return 0;
> +
> +err_put_node:
> + of_node_put(ctx->host_node);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int sn65dsi83_host_attach(struct sn65dsi83 *ctx)
> @@ -673,8 +683,10 @@ static int sn65dsi83_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> return ret;
>
> ctx->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &sn65dsi83_regmap_config);
> - if (IS_ERR(ctx->regmap))
> - return PTR_ERR(ctx->regmap);
> + if (IS_ERR(ctx->regmap)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(ctx->regmap);
> + goto err_put_node;
> + }
>
> dev_set_drvdata(dev, ctx);
> i2c_set_clientdata(client, ctx);
> @@ -691,6 +703,8 @@ static int sn65dsi83_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>
> err_remove_bridge:
> drm_bridge_remove(&ctx->bridge);
> +err_put_node:
> + of_node_put(ctx->host_node);
> return ret;
> }
>

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart