2022-02-09 06:54:52

by Boris Lysov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/31] clk: mediatek: Cleanups and Improvements - Part 1

Hi, I couldn't find a particular patch to reply to so I'm replying cover
letter to give some input on the PLL subsystem.

On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 20:40:03 +0800
Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]> wrote:
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c | 100 +++++-
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.h | 57 ++++

In clk-pll.c there is an mtk_clk_register_pll function which at some point
executes this:

> init.ops = &mtk_pll_ops;

In my opinion there should be a possibility to define a custom mtk_pll_ops for a
given SoC instead of using a hardcoded one because not all Mediatek SoCs share
the same PLL startup/powerdown flow. For example, the existing mtk_pll_prepare
implementation won't work for the entire Mediatek Cortex-A9 SoC family (this
includes but not limited to mt6515, mt6517, mt6575, and mt6577).

> static int mtk_pll_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> {
> struct mtk_clk_pll *pll = to_mtk_clk_pll(hw);
> u32 r;
> u32 div_en_mask;
>
> r = readl(pll->pwr_addr) | CON0_PWR_ON;
> writel(r, pll->pwr_addr);

This code sets a bit to 1 to start a PLL but the SoCs I mentioned above would
need to have that bit cleared (set to 0) [1] [2].

Another interesting thing in mtk_pll_prepare is
> udelay(20);
Is 20 ms a settle time for PLL? If yes then it would also be cool to specify an
arbitrary value easily as some PLLs have longer settle time [3] [4].

Worth noting the SoCs I mentioned aren't in mainline yet, and I think there are
more modern mainline-worthy Mediatek SoCs that might also need these changes in
the future.

Thanks.

[1] MT6577 HSPA Smartphone Application Processor Datasheet, pages 1212-1227
(*_CON0 registers).
[2] MT6515 GSM/EDGE Smartphone Application Processor Datasheet, pages
1202-1216 (*_CON0 registers).
[3] pages 1303-1306 of [1]
[4] MT6589 HSPA+ Smartphone Application Processor Datasheet, page 1344
(MDPLL1 & MDPLL2)


2022-02-09 08:40:03

by Chen-Yu Tsai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/31] clk: mediatek: Cleanups and Improvements - Part 1

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 3:32 AM Boris Lysov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi, I couldn't find a particular patch to reply to so I'm replying cover
> letter to give some input on the PLL subsystem.
>
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 20:40:03 +0800
> Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]> wrote:
> > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c | 100 +++++-
> > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.h | 57 ++++
>
> In clk-pll.c there is an mtk_clk_register_pll function which at some point
> executes this:
>
> > init.ops = &mtk_pll_ops;
>
> In my opinion there should be a possibility to define a custom mtk_pll_ops for a
> given SoC instead of using a hardcoded one because not all Mediatek SoCs share
> the same PLL startup/powerdown flow. For example, the existing mtk_pll_prepare
> implementation won't work for the entire Mediatek Cortex-A9 SoC family (this
> includes but not limited to mt6515, mt6517, mt6575, and mt6577).

Ack. My scope is limited to SoCs used in Chromebooks. However Miles and
Chun-Jie, who are Cc-ed on the series, should know more.

That said, we can implement support for these varying parameters as we
see them, not before.

> > static int mtk_pll_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > {
> > struct mtk_clk_pll *pll = to_mtk_clk_pll(hw);
> > u32 r;
> > u32 div_en_mask;
> >
> > r = readl(pll->pwr_addr) | CON0_PWR_ON;
> > writel(r, pll->pwr_addr);
>
> This code sets a bit to 1 to start a PLL but the SoCs I mentioned above would
> need to have that bit cleared (set to 0) [1] [2].
>
> Another interesting thing in mtk_pll_prepare is
> > udelay(20);
> Is 20 ms a settle time for PLL? If yes then it would also be cool to specify an
> arbitrary value easily as some PLLs have longer settle time [3] [4].

This is a question for whomever upstreamed the driver.
> Worth noting the SoCs I mentioned aren't in mainline yet, and I think there are
> more modern mainline-worthy Mediatek SoCs that might also need these changes in
> the future.

Again, we can implement varying parameters as they appear.

Thanks
ChenYu


>
> Thanks.
>
> [1] MT6577 HSPA Smartphone Application Processor Datasheet, pages 1212-1227
> (*_CON0 registers).
> [2] MT6515 GSM/EDGE Smartphone Application Processor Datasheet, pages
> 1202-1216 (*_CON0 registers).
> [3] pages 1303-1306 of [1]
> [4] MT6589 HSPA+ Smartphone Application Processor Datasheet, page 1344
> (MDPLL1 & MDPLL2)