2019-02-16 10:08:58

by Yang Shi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] doc: cgroup: correct the wrong information about measure of memory pressure

Since PSI has implemented some kind of measure of memory pressure, the
statement about lack of such measure is not true anymore.

Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
index 7bf3f12..9a92013 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
@@ -1310,8 +1310,7 @@ network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
-memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
-implemented yet.
+memory.


Memory Ownership
--
1.8.3.1



2019-02-19 02:32:24

by Tejun Heo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: cgroup: correct the wrong information about measure of memory pressure

On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 08:56:04AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> Since PSI has implemented some kind of measure of memory pressure, the
> statement about lack of such measure is not true anymore.
>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> index 7bf3f12..9a92013 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> @@ -1310,8 +1310,7 @@ network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
> performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
> pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
> memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
> -memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
> -implemented yet.
> +memory.

Maybe refer to PSI?

Thanks.

--
tejun

2019-02-19 10:47:00

by 禹舟键

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: cgroup: correct the wrong information about measure of memory pressure

Hi TeJun
I've built the 5.0.0-rc6 kernel with psi option, but I cannot find any
cgroup.controllers when I mounted cgroup2.

[root@bogon /]# uname -r
[root@bogon /]# 5.0.0-rc6+
[root@bogon /]# mount -t cgroup2 none cgroup2/
[root@bogon /]# cat cgroup2/cgroup.controllers
[root@bogon /]
[root@bogon /]# cat cgroup2/cgroup.subtree_control
[root@bogon /]#

What's wrong with this kernel? Or maybe I lost some mount option?

Thanks
Yuzhoujian

Tejun Heo <[email protected]> 于2019年2月19日周二 上午10:32写道:
>
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 08:56:04AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> > Since PSI has implemented some kind of measure of memory pressure, the
> > statement about lack of such measure is not true anymore.
> >
> > Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> > index 7bf3f12..9a92013 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> > @@ -1310,8 +1310,7 @@ network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
> > performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
> > pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
> > memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
> > -memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
> > -implemented yet.
> > +memory.
>
> Maybe refer to PSI?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun

2019-02-19 16:49:22

by Yang Shi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: cgroup: correct the wrong information about measure of memory pressure



On 2/18/19 1:05 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 08:56:04AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>> Since PSI has implemented some kind of measure of memory pressure, the
>> statement about lack of such measure is not true anymore.
>>
>> Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
>> index 7bf3f12..9a92013 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
>> @@ -1310,8 +1310,7 @@ network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
>> performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
>> pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
>> memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
>> -memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
>> -implemented yet.
>> +memory.
> Maybe refer to PSI?

I thought so too, but the above "memory.pressure" has already referred
to PSI. So, I was not sure if we should duplicate PSI information.

Thanks,
Yang

>
> Thanks.
>


2019-02-21 19:56:55

by Yang Shi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: cgroup: correct the wrong information about measure of memory pressure



On 2/19/19 2:45 AM, 禹舟键 wrote:
> Hi TeJun
> I've built the 5.0.0-rc6 kernel with psi option, but I cannot find any
> cgroup.controllers when I mounted cgroup2.
>
> [root@bogon /]# uname -r
> [root@bogon /]# 5.0.0-rc6+
> [root@bogon /]# mount -t cgroup2 none cgroup2/
> [root@bogon /]# cat cgroup2/cgroup.controllers
> [root@bogon /]
> [root@bogon /]# cat cgroup2/cgroup.subtree_control
> [root@bogon /]#
>
> What's wrong with this kernel? Or maybe I lost some mount option?

I'm not sure what you did before you mounted cgroup2, but if you have
legacy controllers mounted, you have to unmount them, otherwise
cgroup.controllers would show up as empty. Or you can pass
"cgroup_no_v1=" in your kernel parameter.

Yang

>
> Thanks
> Yuzhoujian
>
> Tejun Heo <[email protected]> 于2019年2月19日周二 上午10:32写道:
>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 08:56:04AM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> Since PSI has implemented some kind of measure of memory pressure, the
>>> statement about lack of such measure is not true anymore.
>>>
>>> Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 3 +--
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
>>> index 7bf3f12..9a92013 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
>>> @@ -1310,8 +1310,7 @@ network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
>>> performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
>>> pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
>>> memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
>>> -memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
>>> -implemented yet.
>>> +memory.
>> Maybe refer to PSI?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> tejun