2022-03-03 08:56:08

by Tyrone Ting

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/11] i2c: npcm: Support NPCM845

From: Tyrone Ting <[email protected]>

Add NPCM8XX I2C support.
The NPCM8XX uses a similar i2c module as NPCM7XX.
The internal HW FIFO is larger in NPCM8XX.

Signed-off-by: Tyrone Ting <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tali Perry <[email protected]>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 8 +-
drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-npcm7xx.c | 126 +++++++++++++++++++------------
3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
index 8a6c6ee28556..ea0b63274442 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
@@ -817,13 +817,13 @@ config I2C_NOMADIK
I2C interface from ST-Ericsson's Nomadik and Ux500 architectures,
as well as the STA2X11 PCIe I/O HUB.

-config I2C_NPCM7XX
+config I2C_NPCM
tristate "Nuvoton I2C Controller"
- depends on ARCH_NPCM7XX || COMPILE_TEST
+ depends on ARCH_NPCM || COMPILE_TEST
help
If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the
- Nuvoton I2C controller, which is available on the NPCM7xx BMC
- controller.
+ Nuvoton I2C controller, which is available on the NPCM BMC
+ controllers.
Driver can also support slave mode (select I2C_SLAVE).

config I2C_OCORES
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
index 1d00dce77098..01fdf74a5565 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_MT7621) += i2c-mt7621.o
obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_MV64XXX) += i2c-mv64xxx.o
obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_MXS) += i2c-mxs.o
obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_NOMADIK) += i2c-nomadik.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_NPCM7XX) += i2c-npcm7xx.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_NPCM) += i2c-npcm7xx.o
obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_OCORES) += i2c-ocores.o
obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_OMAP) += i2c-omap.o
obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_OWL) += i2c-owl.o
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-npcm7xx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-npcm7xx.c
index 5c0bbc134f9d..a6266ebc6a6f 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-npcm7xx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-npcm7xx.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>

@@ -91,7 +92,6 @@ enum i2c_addr {

/* init register and default value required to enable module */
#define NPCM_I2CSEGCTL 0xE4
-#define NPCM_I2CSEGCTL_INIT_VAL 0x0333F000

/* Common regs */
#define NPCM_I2CSDA 0x00
@@ -228,8 +228,7 @@ static const int npcm_i2caddr[I2C_NUM_OWN_ADDR] = {
#define NPCM_I2CFIF_CTS_CLR_FIFO BIT(6)
#define NPCM_I2CFIF_CTS_SLVRSTR BIT(7)

-/* NPCM_I2CTXF_CTL reg fields */
-#define NPCM_I2CTXF_CTL_TX_THR GENMASK(4, 0)
+/* NPCM_I2CTXF_CTL reg field */
#define NPCM_I2CTXF_CTL_THR_TXIE BIT(6)

/* NPCM_I2CT_OUT reg fields */
@@ -238,22 +237,18 @@ static const int npcm_i2caddr[I2C_NUM_OWN_ADDR] = {
#define NPCM_I2CT_OUT_T_OUTST BIT(7)

/* NPCM_I2CTXF_STS reg fields */
-#define NPCM_I2CTXF_STS_TX_BYTES GENMASK(4, 0)
#define NPCM_I2CTXF_STS_TX_THST BIT(6)

/* NPCM_I2CRXF_STS reg fields */
-#define NPCM_I2CRXF_STS_RX_BYTES GENMASK(4, 0)
#define NPCM_I2CRXF_STS_RX_THST BIT(6)

/* NPCM_I2CFIF_CTL reg fields */
#define NPCM_I2CFIF_CTL_FIFO_EN BIT(4)

/* NPCM_I2CRXF_CTL reg fields */
-#define NPCM_I2CRXF_CTL_RX_THR GENMASK(4, 0)
-#define NPCM_I2CRXF_CTL_LAST_PEC BIT(5)
#define NPCM_I2CRXF_CTL_THR_RXIE BIT(6)

-#define I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE 16
+#define MAX_I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE 32

/* I2C_VER reg fields */
#define I2C_VER_VERSION GENMASK(6, 0)
@@ -270,11 +265,36 @@ static const int npcm_i2caddr[I2C_NUM_OWN_ADDR] = {
#define I2C_FREQ_MIN_HZ 10000
#define I2C_FREQ_MAX_HZ I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ

+struct npcm_i2c_data {
+ u8 fifo_size;
+ u32 segctl_init_val;
+ u8 txf_sts_tx_bytes;
+ u8 rxf_sts_rx_bytes;
+ u8 rxf_ctl_last_pec;
+};
+
+static const struct npcm_i2c_data npxm7xx_i2c_data = {
+ .fifo_size = 16,
+ .segctl_init_val = 0x0333F000,
+ .txf_sts_tx_bytes = GENMASK(4, 0),
+ .rxf_sts_rx_bytes = GENMASK(4, 0),
+ .rxf_ctl_last_pec = BIT(5)
+};
+
+static const struct npcm_i2c_data npxm8xx_i2c_data = {
+ .fifo_size = 32,
+ .segctl_init_val = 0x9333F000,
+ .txf_sts_tx_bytes = GENMASK(5, 0),
+ .rxf_sts_rx_bytes = GENMASK(5, 0),
+ .rxf_ctl_last_pec = BIT(7)
+};
+
/* Status of one I2C module */
struct npcm_i2c {
struct i2c_adapter adap;
struct device *dev;
unsigned char __iomem *reg;
+ const struct npcm_i2c_data *data;
spinlock_t lock; /* IRQ synchronization */
struct completion cmd_complete;
int cmd_err;
@@ -307,8 +327,8 @@ struct npcm_i2c {
int slv_rd_ind;
int slv_wr_size;
int slv_wr_ind;
- u8 slv_rd_buf[I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE];
- u8 slv_wr_buf[I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE];
+ u8 slv_rd_buf[MAX_I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE];
+ u8 slv_wr_buf[MAX_I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE];
#endif
struct dentry *debugfs; /* debugfs device directory */
u64 ber_cnt;
@@ -441,7 +461,7 @@ static inline bool npcm_i2c_tx_fifo_empty(struct npcm_i2c *bus)

tx_fifo_sts = ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_STS);
/* check if TX FIFO is not empty */
- if ((tx_fifo_sts & NPCM_I2CTXF_STS_TX_BYTES) == 0)
+ if ((tx_fifo_sts & bus->data->txf_sts_tx_bytes) == 0)
return false;

/* check if TX FIFO status bit is set: */
@@ -454,7 +474,7 @@ static inline bool npcm_i2c_rx_fifo_full(struct npcm_i2c *bus)

rx_fifo_sts = ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CRXF_STS);
/* check if RX FIFO is not empty: */
- if ((rx_fifo_sts & NPCM_I2CRXF_STS_RX_BYTES) == 0)
+ if ((rx_fifo_sts & bus->data->rxf_sts_rx_bytes) == 0)
return false;

/* check if rx fifo full status is set: */
@@ -743,11 +763,11 @@ static void npcm_i2c_callback(struct npcm_i2c *bus,
static u8 npcm_i2c_fifo_usage(struct npcm_i2c *bus)
{
if (bus->operation == I2C_WRITE_OPER)
- return FIELD_GET(NPCM_I2CTXF_STS_TX_BYTES,
- ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_STS));
+ return (bus->data->txf_sts_tx_bytes &
+ ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_STS));
if (bus->operation == I2C_READ_OPER)
- return FIELD_GET(NPCM_I2CRXF_STS_RX_BYTES,
- ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CRXF_STS));
+ return (bus->data->rxf_sts_rx_bytes &
+ ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CRXF_STS));
return 0;
}

@@ -759,13 +779,13 @@ static void npcm_i2c_write_to_fifo_master(struct npcm_i2c *bus, u16 max_bytes)
* Fill the FIFO, while the FIFO is not full and there are more bytes
* to write
*/
- size_free_fifo = I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE - npcm_i2c_fifo_usage(bus);
+ size_free_fifo = bus->data->fifo_size - npcm_i2c_fifo_usage(bus);
while (max_bytes-- && size_free_fifo) {
if (bus->wr_ind < bus->wr_size)
npcm_i2c_wr_byte(bus, bus->wr_buf[bus->wr_ind++]);
else
npcm_i2c_wr_byte(bus, 0xFF);
- size_free_fifo = I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE - npcm_i2c_fifo_usage(bus);
+ size_free_fifo = bus->data->fifo_size - npcm_i2c_fifo_usage(bus);
}
}

@@ -786,11 +806,11 @@ static void npcm_i2c_set_fifo(struct npcm_i2c *bus, int nread, int nwrite)

/* configure RX FIFO */
if (nread > 0) {
- rxf_ctl = min_t(int, nread, I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE);
+ rxf_ctl = min_t(int, nread, bus->data->fifo_size);

/* set LAST bit. if LAST is set next FIFO packet is nacked */
- if (nread <= I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE)
- rxf_ctl |= NPCM_I2CRXF_CTL_LAST_PEC;
+ if (nread <= bus->data->fifo_size)
+ rxf_ctl |= bus->data->rxf_ctl_last_pec;

/*
* if we are about to read the first byte in blk rd mode,
@@ -808,9 +828,9 @@ static void npcm_i2c_set_fifo(struct npcm_i2c *bus, int nread, int nwrite)

/* configure TX FIFO */
if (nwrite > 0) {
- if (nwrite > I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE)
+ if (nwrite > bus->data->fifo_size)
/* data to send is more then FIFO size. */
- iowrite8(I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE, bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_CTL);
+ iowrite8(bus->data->fifo_size, bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_CTL);
else
iowrite8(nwrite, bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_CTL);

@@ -879,13 +899,13 @@ static void npcm_i2c_write_fifo_slave(struct npcm_i2c *bus, u16 max_bytes)
npcm_i2c_clear_fifo_int(bus);
npcm_i2c_clear_tx_fifo(bus);
iowrite8(0, bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_CTL);
- while (max_bytes-- && I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE != npcm_i2c_fifo_usage(bus)) {
+ while (max_bytes-- && bus->data->fifo_size != npcm_i2c_fifo_usage(bus)) {
if (bus->slv_wr_size <= 0)
break;
- bus->slv_wr_ind = bus->slv_wr_ind % I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE;
+ bus->slv_wr_ind = bus->slv_wr_ind & (bus->data->fifo_size - 1);
npcm_i2c_wr_byte(bus, bus->slv_wr_buf[bus->slv_wr_ind]);
bus->slv_wr_ind++;
- bus->slv_wr_ind = bus->slv_wr_ind % I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE;
+ bus->slv_wr_ind = bus->slv_wr_ind & (bus->data->fifo_size - 1);
bus->slv_wr_size--;
}
}
@@ -900,7 +920,7 @@ static void npcm_i2c_read_fifo_slave(struct npcm_i2c *bus, u8 bytes_in_fifo)
while (bytes_in_fifo--) {
data = npcm_i2c_rd_byte(bus);

- bus->slv_rd_ind = bus->slv_rd_ind % I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE;
+ bus->slv_rd_ind = bus->slv_rd_ind & (bus->data->fifo_size - 1);
bus->slv_rd_buf[bus->slv_rd_ind] = data;
bus->slv_rd_ind++;

@@ -918,8 +938,8 @@ static int npcm_i2c_slave_get_wr_buf(struct npcm_i2c *bus)
int ret = bus->slv_wr_ind;

/* fill a cyclic buffer */
- for (i = 0; i < I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE; i++) {
- if (bus->slv_wr_size >= I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE)
+ for (i = 0; i < bus->data->fifo_size; i++) {
+ if (bus->slv_wr_size >= bus->data->fifo_size)
break;
if (bus->state == I2C_SLAVE_MATCH) {
i2c_slave_event(bus->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, &value);
@@ -927,11 +947,11 @@ static int npcm_i2c_slave_get_wr_buf(struct npcm_i2c *bus)
} else {
i2c_slave_event(bus->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED, &value);
}
- ind = (bus->slv_wr_ind + bus->slv_wr_size) % I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE;
+ ind = (bus->slv_wr_ind + bus->slv_wr_size) & (bus->data->fifo_size - 1);
bus->slv_wr_buf[ind] = value;
bus->slv_wr_size++;
}
- return I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE - ret;
+ return bus->data->fifo_size - ret;
}

static void npcm_i2c_slave_send_rd_buf(struct npcm_i2c *bus)
@@ -966,7 +986,7 @@ static void npcm_i2c_slave_receive(struct npcm_i2c *bus, u16 nread,
bus->slv_rd_ind = 0;

iowrite8(0, bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_CTL);
- iowrite8(I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE, bus->reg + NPCM_I2CRXF_CTL);
+ iowrite8(bus->data->fifo_size, bus->reg + NPCM_I2CRXF_CTL);
npcm_i2c_clear_tx_fifo(bus);
npcm_i2c_clear_rx_fifo(bus);
}
@@ -999,12 +1019,12 @@ static void npcm_i2c_slave_wr_buf_sync(struct npcm_i2c *bus)
{
int left_in_fifo;

- left_in_fifo = FIELD_GET(NPCM_I2CTXF_STS_TX_BYTES,
- ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_STS));
+ left_in_fifo = (bus->data->txf_sts_tx_bytes &
+ ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_STS));

/* fifo already full: */
- if (left_in_fifo >= I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE ||
- bus->slv_wr_size >= I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE)
+ if (left_in_fifo >= bus->data->fifo_size ||
+ bus->slv_wr_size >= bus->data->fifo_size)
return;

/* update the wr fifo index back to the untransmitted bytes: */
@@ -1012,7 +1032,7 @@ static void npcm_i2c_slave_wr_buf_sync(struct npcm_i2c *bus)
bus->slv_wr_size = bus->slv_wr_size + left_in_fifo;

if (bus->slv_wr_ind < 0)
- bus->slv_wr_ind += I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE;
+ bus->slv_wr_ind += bus->data->fifo_size;
}

static void npcm_i2c_slave_rd_wr(struct npcm_i2c *bus)
@@ -1158,7 +1178,7 @@ static irqreturn_t npcm_i2c_int_slave_handler(struct npcm_i2c *bus)
npcm_i2c_clear_rx_fifo(bus);
npcm_i2c_clear_tx_fifo(bus);
iowrite8(0, bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_CTL);
- iowrite8(I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE, bus->reg + NPCM_I2CRXF_CTL);
+ iowrite8(bus->data->fifo_size, bus->reg + NPCM_I2CRXF_CTL);
if (NPCM_I2CST_XMIT & i2cst) {
bus->operation = I2C_WRITE_OPER;
} else {
@@ -1319,8 +1339,8 @@ static void npcm_i2c_master_fifo_read(struct npcm_i2c *bus)
* read == FIFO Size + C (where C < FIFO Size)then first read C bytes
* and in the next int we read rest of the data.
*/
- if (rcount < (2 * I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE) && rcount > I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE)
- fifo_bytes = rcount - I2C_HW_FIFO_SIZE;
+ if (rcount < (2 * bus->data->fifo_size) && rcount > bus->data->fifo_size)
+ fifo_bytes = rcount - bus->data->fifo_size;

if (rcount <= fifo_bytes) {
/* last bytes are about to be read - end of tx */
@@ -2200,7 +2220,7 @@ static int npcm_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
* It cannot be cleared without resetting the module.
*/
else if (bus->cmd_err &&
- (NPCM_I2CRXF_CTL_LAST_PEC & ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CRXF_CTL)))
+ (bus->data->rxf_ctl_last_pec & ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CRXF_CTL)))
npcm_i2c_reset(bus);

/* after any xfer, successful or not, stall and EOB must be disabled */
@@ -2265,12 +2285,21 @@ static void npcm_i2c_init_debugfs(struct platform_device *pdev,
bus->debugfs = d;
}

+static const struct of_device_id npcm_i2c_bus_of_table[] = {
+ { .compatible = "nuvoton,npcm750-i2c", .data = &npxm7xx_i2c_data },
+ { .compatible = "nuvoton,npcm845-i2c", .data = &npxm8xx_i2c_data },
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, npcm_i2c_bus_of_table);
+
static int npcm_i2c_probe_bus(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct npcm_i2c *bus;
struct i2c_adapter *adap;
struct clk *i2c_clk;
static struct regmap *gcr_regmap;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ const struct of_device_id *match;
int irq;
int ret;
struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
@@ -2281,6 +2310,13 @@ static int npcm_i2c_probe_bus(struct platform_device *pdev)

bus->dev = &pdev->dev;

+ match = of_match_device(npcm_i2c_bus_of_table, dev);
+ if (!match) {
+ dev_err(dev, "OF data missing\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ bus->data = match->data;
+
bus->num = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "i2c");
/* core clk must be acquired to calculate module timing settings */
i2c_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
@@ -2294,7 +2330,7 @@ static int npcm_i2c_probe_bus(struct platform_device *pdev)

if (IS_ERR(gcr_regmap))
return PTR_ERR(gcr_regmap);
- regmap_write(gcr_regmap, NPCM_I2CSEGCTL, NPCM_I2CSEGCTL_INIT_VAL);
+ regmap_write(gcr_regmap, NPCM_I2CSEGCTL, bus->data->segctl_init_val);

bus->reg = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
if (IS_ERR(bus->reg))
@@ -2355,12 +2391,6 @@ static int npcm_i2c_remove_bus(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}

-static const struct of_device_id npcm_i2c_bus_of_table[] = {
- { .compatible = "nuvoton,npcm750-i2c", },
- {}
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, npcm_i2c_bus_of_table);
-
static struct platform_driver npcm_i2c_bus_driver = {
.probe = npcm_i2c_probe_bus,
.remove = npcm_i2c_remove_bus,
--
2.17.1


2022-03-03 10:52:54

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] i2c: npcm: Support NPCM845

On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:31:41PM +0800, Tyrone Ting wrote:
> From: Tyrone Ting <[email protected]>
>
> Add NPCM8XX I2C support.
> The NPCM8XX uses a similar i2c module as NPCM7XX.
> The internal HW FIFO is larger in NPCM8XX.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tyrone Ting <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Tali Perry <[email protected]>

Wrong SoB chain.

...

> +static const struct npcm_i2c_data npxm7xx_i2c_data = {
> + .fifo_size = 16,
> + .segctl_init_val = 0x0333F000,
> + .txf_sts_tx_bytes = GENMASK(4, 0),
> + .rxf_sts_rx_bytes = GENMASK(4, 0),
> + .rxf_ctl_last_pec = BIT(5)

+ Comma.

> +};
> +
> +static const struct npcm_i2c_data npxm8xx_i2c_data = {
> + .fifo_size = 32,
> + .segctl_init_val = 0x9333F000,
> + .txf_sts_tx_bytes = GENMASK(5, 0),
> + .rxf_sts_rx_bytes = GENMASK(5, 0),
> + .rxf_ctl_last_pec = BIT(7)

Ditto.

> +};

...

> - left_in_fifo = FIELD_GET(NPCM_I2CTXF_STS_TX_BYTES,
> - ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_STS));
> + left_in_fifo = (bus->data->txf_sts_tx_bytes &
> + ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_STS));

Besides too many parentheses, this is an interesting change. So, in different
versions of IP the field is on different bits? Perhaps it means that you need
something like internal ops structure for all these, where you will have been
using the statically defined masks?

...

> + match = of_match_device(npcm_i2c_bus_of_table, dev);
> + if (!match) {
> + dev_err(dev, "OF data missing\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + bus->data = match->data;

This is NIH of_device_get_match_data().

...

> -static const struct of_device_id npcm_i2c_bus_of_table[] = {
> - { .compatible = "nuvoton,npcm750-i2c", },
> - {}
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, npcm_i2c_bus_of_table);
> -

Redundant change, leave this as is.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


2022-03-03 13:14:03

by Tali Perry

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] i2c: npcm: Support NPCM845

> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 12:45 PM Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:31:41PM +0800, Tyrone Ting wrote:
> > > From: Tyrone Ting <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Add NPCM8XX I2C support.
> > > The NPCM8XX uses a similar i2c module as NPCM7XX.
> > > The internal HW FIFO is larger in NPCM8XX.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tyrone Ting <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tali Perry <[email protected]>
> >
> > Wrong SoB chain.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > +static const struct npcm_i2c_data npxm7xx_i2c_data = {
> > > + .fifo_size = 16,
> > > + .segctl_init_val = 0x0333F000,
> > > + .txf_sts_tx_bytes = GENMASK(4, 0),
> > > + .rxf_sts_rx_bytes = GENMASK(4, 0),
> > > + .rxf_ctl_last_pec = BIT(5)
> >
> > + Comma.
> >
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct npcm_i2c_data npxm8xx_i2c_data = {
> > > + .fifo_size = 32,
> > > + .segctl_init_val = 0x9333F000,
> > > + .txf_sts_tx_bytes = GENMASK(5, 0),
> > > + .rxf_sts_rx_bytes = GENMASK(5, 0),
> > > + .rxf_ctl_last_pec = BIT(7)
> >
> > Ditto.
> >
> > > +};
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > - left_in_fifo = FIELD_GET(NPCM_I2CTXF_STS_TX_BYTES,
> > > - ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_STS));
> > > + left_in_fifo = (bus->data->txf_sts_tx_bytes &
> > > + ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_STS));
> >
> > Besides too many parentheses, this is an interesting change. So, in different
> > versions of IP the field is on different bits? Perhaps it means that you need
> > something like internal ops structure for all these, where you will have been
> > using the statically defined masks?
> >

Those are two very similar modules. The first generation had a 16 bytes HW FIFO
and the second generation has 32 bytes.
In V1 of this patchset the masks were defined under
CONFIG but we were asked to change the approach:

the entire discussion can be found here:

https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg55566.html

Did we understand the request change right?


> > ...
> >
> > > + match = of_match_device(npcm_i2c_bus_of_table, dev);
> > > + if (!match) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "OF data missing\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > + bus->data = match->data;
> >
> > This is NIH of_device_get_match_data().
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > -static const struct of_device_id npcm_i2c_bus_of_table[] = {
> > > - { .compatible = "nuvoton,npcm750-i2c", },
> > > - {}
> > > -};
> > > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, npcm_i2c_bus_of_table);
> > > -
> >
> > Redundant change, leave this as is.
> >
> > --
> > With Best Regards,
> > Andy Shevchenko
> >
> >

Thanks for the detailed review, Andy!

BR,
Tali Perry
Nuvoton Technologies

2022-03-03 14:34:41

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] i2c: npcm: Support NPCM845

On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 02:35:58PM +0200, Tali Perry wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 12:45 PM Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:31:41PM +0800, Tyrone Ting wrote:

...

> > > > - left_in_fifo = FIELD_GET(NPCM_I2CTXF_STS_TX_BYTES,
> > > > - ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_STS));
> > > > + left_in_fifo = (bus->data->txf_sts_tx_bytes &
> > > > + ioread8(bus->reg + NPCM_I2CTXF_STS));
> > >
> > > Besides too many parentheses, this is an interesting change. So, in different
> > > versions of IP the field is on different bits? Perhaps it means that you need
> > > something like internal ops structure for all these, where you will have been
> > > using the statically defined masks?
> > >
>
> Those are two very similar modules. The first generation had a 16 bytes HW FIFO
> and the second generation has 32 bytes.
> In V1 of this patchset the masks were defined under
> CONFIG but we were asked to change the approach:
>
> the entire discussion can be found here:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg55566.html
>
> Did we understand the request change right?

Not really. If you have not simply "one (MSB) bit more" for FIFO size, then
I proposed to create a specific operations structure and use callbacks (see
drivers/dma/dw/ case for iDMA 32-bit vs. DesignWare).

But hold on and read set of questions below.

Previously it was a fixed field with the NPCM_I2CTXF_STS_TX_BYTES mask applied,
right? From above I have got that FIFO is growing twice. Is it correct?
Does the LSB stay at the same offset? What is the meaning of the MSB in 32 byte
case? If it's reserved then why not to always use 32 byte approach?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


2022-03-07 10:39:28

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] i2c: npcm: Support NPCM845

On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 03:33:20PM +0200, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 at 16:11, Andy Shevchenko <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 02:35:58PM +0200, Tali Perry wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 12:45 PM Andy Shevchenko <
> > [email protected]> wrote:

...

> > But hold on and read set of questions below.
> >
> > Previously it was a fixed field with the NPCM_I2CTXF_STS_TX_BYTES mask
> > applied,
> > right? From above I have got that FIFO is growing twice. Is it correct?
>
> What do you mean by growing twice? TX and RX?

I meant from 16 bytes to 32 bytes.

> > Does the LSB stay at the same offset? What is the meaning of the MSB in 32
> > byte
> > case? If it's reserved then why not to always use 32 byte approach?
>
> Yes, the LSB stays in the same place, and bit 5 is reserved in the NPCM7XX
> SoC.
> Unfortunately, the I2C test failed when we tried to use the 32 bytes
> approach at NPCM7XX Soc, this is why we added NPCM_I2CTXF_STS_TX_BYTES and
> NPCM_I2C_STSRXF_RX_BYTES to the data structure.
>
> The device tree data structure pass data for each specific device, so I
> don't understand why not use device tree data for supporting the I2C
> specific device? this is not the case here?

Basically we use compatible strings for that, but in any case if something
can be autodetected from hardware, it's better to use autodetection.


--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko