On 5/19/22 5:27 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 1:25 AM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'll leave that to you :-)
>
> Alright, I'll have a look. Which one do I want here? This series adds
> splice_read/splice_write. The new thing would be sendpage? Or
> copy_file_range? Or something else?
For copying kernel memory? It's really the same thing, you just
initialize the iter as an ITER_KVEC instead. The nice thing about the
iov_iter iterator that it then hides that for you, call the same copy
in/out helpers for it.
--
Jens Axboe
Hi Jens,
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 1:57 AM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 5/19/22 5:27 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Hi Jens,
> >
> > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 1:25 AM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I'll leave that to you :-)
> >
> > Alright, I'll have a look. Which one do I want here? This series adds
> > splice_read/splice_write. The new thing would be sendpage? Or
> > copy_file_range? Or something else?
>
> For copying kernel memory? It's really the same thing, you just
> initialize the iter as an ITER_KVEC instead. The nice thing about the
> iov_iter iterator that it then hides that for you, call the same copy
> in/out helpers for it.
Err, maybe we're talking about different things? I was thinking about
the plumbing to make splice/sendfile work on non-pipes.
get_random_bytes() itself doesn't need to become iovec'd, as that has
no IO callers.
Jason