Request and deassert any (optional) reset gpio during probe in case it
has been left asserted by the boot firmware.
Note the reset line is not asserted to avoid reverting to the default
I2C address in case the firmware has configured an alternate address.
Tested-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
index f71c490f25c8..5a77155a63d7 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8008.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
#include <linux/i2c.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
@@ -156,6 +157,7 @@ static struct regmap_config qcom_mfd_regmap_cfg = {
static int pm8008_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
{
struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_data;
+ struct gpio_desc *reset;
int rc;
struct device *dev;
struct regmap *regmap;
@@ -167,6 +169,16 @@ static int pm8008_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
i2c_set_clientdata(client, regmap);
+ reset = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+ if (IS_ERR(reset))
+ return PTR_ERR(reset);
+
+ /*
+ * The PMIC does not appear to require a post-reset delay, but wait
+ * for a millisecond for now anyway.
+ */
+ usleep_range(1000, 2000);
+
if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "interrupt-controller")) {
rc = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(dev, regmap, client->irq,
IRQF_SHARED, 0, &pm8008_irq_chip, &irq_data);
--
2.44.1
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 7:30 PM Johan Hovold <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Request and deassert any (optional) reset gpio during probe in case it
> has been left asserted by the boot firmware.
>
> Note the reset line is not asserted to avoid reverting to the default
> I2C address in case the firmware has configured an alternate address.
..
> + /*
> + * The PMIC does not appear to require a post-reset delay, but wait
> + * for a millisecond for now anyway.
> + */
> + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
fsleep() ?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:45:40PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 7:30 PM Johan Hovold <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Request and deassert any (optional) reset gpio during probe in case it
> > has been left asserted by the boot firmware.
> >
> > Note the reset line is not asserted to avoid reverting to the default
> > I2C address in case the firmware has configured an alternate address.
>
> ...
>
> > + /*
> > + * The PMIC does not appear to require a post-reset delay, but wait
> > + * for a millisecond for now anyway.
> > + */
>
> > + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
>
> fsleep() ?
No, I'd only use fsleep() when the argument is variable.
Johan
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 11:08 AM Johan Hovold <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:45:40PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 7:30 PM Johan Hovold <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Request and deassert any (optional) reset gpio during probe in case it
> > > has been left asserted by the boot firmware.
> > >
> > > Note the reset line is not asserted to avoid reverting to the default
> > > I2C address in case the firmware has configured an alternate address.
..
> > > + /*
> > > + * The PMIC does not appear to require a post-reset delay, but wait
> > > + * for a millisecond for now anyway.
> > > + */
> >
> > > + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> >
> > fsleep() ?
>
> No, I'd only use fsleep() when the argument is variable.
Okay, this is basically the same issue as with use of dev_err_probe()
with known errors. fsleep() hides the choice between let's say
msleep() / usleep_range() / udelay() from the caller. This, in
particular, might allow shifting constraints if the timer core is
changed or becomes more granular. It's independent to the variable or
constant parameter(s). Whatever, I'm not going to insist.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 11:34:55AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 11:08 AM Johan Hovold <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:45:40PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 7:30 PM Johan Hovold <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Request and deassert any (optional) reset gpio during probe in case it
> > > > has been left asserted by the boot firmware.
> > > >
> > > > Note the reset line is not asserted to avoid reverting to the default
> > > > I2C address in case the firmware has configured an alternate address.
>
> ...
>
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * The PMIC does not appear to require a post-reset delay, but wait
> > > > + * for a millisecond for now anyway.
> > > > + */
> > >
> > > > + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> > >
> > > fsleep() ?
> >
> > No, I'd only use fsleep() when the argument is variable.
>
> Okay, this is basically the same issue as with use of dev_err_probe()
> with known errors. fsleep() hides the choice between let's say
> msleep() / usleep_range() / udelay() from the caller. This, in
> particular, might allow shifting constraints if the timer core is
> changed or becomes more granular. It's independent to the variable or
> constant parameter(s). Whatever, I'm not going to insist.
I prefer that developers are aware of what they are doing and understand
the difference between, say, usleep_range() and udelay(), instead of
hiding things away in obscure helper functions.
Johan