2018-07-04 21:56:41

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the gfs2 tree

Hi all,

Commits

0627518adcc8 ("GFS2: rgrp free blocks used incorrectly")
b30cbec54def ("gfs2: Don't reject a supposedly full bitmap if we have blocks reserved")

are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.

Not updated in the rebase.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2018-07-04 21:58:13

by Stephen Rothwell

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the gfs2 tree

Hi all,

On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 07:55:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Commits
>
> 0627518adcc8 ("GFS2: rgrp free blocks used incorrectly")
> b30cbec54def ("gfs2: Don't reject a supposedly full bitmap if we have blocks reserved")
>
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.
>
> Not updated in the rebase.

Just cc'ing the committer.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachments:
(No filename) (499.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2018-07-04 22:23:59

by Andreas Grünbacher

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the gfs2 tree

2018-07-04 23:57 GMT+02:00 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 07:55:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Commits
>>
>> 0627518adcc8 ("GFS2: rgrp free blocks used incorrectly")
>> b30cbec54def ("gfs2: Don't reject a supposedly full bitmap if we have blocks reserved")
>>
>> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.
>>
>> Not updated in the rebase.
>
> Just cc'ing the committer.

Yeah thanks, fixed now.

Andreas