2012-10-19 13:45:39

by Sjur Brændeland

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: remoteproc open issues (was [RFC 1/4] remoteproc: Bugfix assign device address to carveout (noiommu)

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <[email protected]> wrote:
> The general direction I have in mind is to put the resource table in
> its final location while we do the first pass of fw parsing.
>
> This will solve all sort of open issues we have (or going to have soon):
>
> 1. dynamically-allocated address of the vrings can be communicated
> 2. vdev statuses can be communicated
> 3. virtio config space will finally become bi-directional as it should
> 4. dynamically probed rproc-to-rproc IPC could then take place
>
> It's the real deal :)
>
> The only problem with this approach is that the resource table isn't
> reloaded throughout cycles of power up/down, and that is insecure.
> We'll have to manually reload it somewhere after the rproc is powered
> down (or before it is powered up again).
>
> This change will break existing firmwares, but it looks required and inevitable.

Has anyone started looking into any of the open issues mentioned above?

Thanks,
Sjur


2012-10-19 14:20:08

by Ohad Ben Cohen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: remoteproc open issues (was [RFC 1/4] remoteproc: Bugfix assign device address to carveout (noiommu)

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Sjur Br?ndeland <[email protected]> wrote:
> Has anyone started looking into any of the open issues mentioned above?

No - feel free to take a stab at it.

Thanks,
Ohad.