2015-08-19 16:40:29

by Vinod Koul

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: pl330: do not emit loop for 1 byte transfer.

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 06:04:49PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> When there is only one burst required do not emit loop instructions to
> loop exactly once. Emit just the body of the loop.

Applied, thanks

--
~Vinod


2015-08-19 23:58:51

by Krzysztof Kozłowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: pl330: do not emit loop for 1 byte transfer.

2015-08-20 1:42 GMT+09:00 Vinod Koul <[email protected]>:
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 06:04:49PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > When there is only one burst required do not emit loop instructions to
> > loop exactly once. Emit just the body of the loop.
>
> Applied, thanks

Where is the patch? I can't find it on my subscribed mailing lists
(like dmaengine, LKML). It seems it is not present also in Google. The
same applies to 2/2. I see only replies (Vinod's and Michal's) but not
original email.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

2015-08-20 00:55:31

by Vinod Koul

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: pl330: do not emit loop for 1 byte transfer.

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:58:49AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozłowski wrote:
> 2015-08-20 1:42 GMT+09:00 Vinod Koul <[email protected]>:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 06:04:49PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > > When there is only one burst required do not emit loop instructions to
> > > loop exactly once. Emit just the body of the loop.
> >
> > Applied, thanks
>
> Where is the patch? I can't find it on my subscribed mailing lists
> (like dmaengine, LKML). It seems it is not present also in Google. The
> same applies to 2/2. I see only replies (Vinod's and Michal's) but not
> original email.

Now that you mentioned I did notice that too. Somehow the vger lists have
rejected this patch, althpugh it is addressed to both dmaengine and lkml
list

--
~Vinod