2020-06-04 09:22:41

by Alexander Potapenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ovl: explicitly initialize error in ovl_copy_xattr()

Under certain circumstances (we found this out running Docker on a
Clang-built kernel with CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL) ovl_copy_xattr() may
return uninitialized value of |error| from ovl_copy_xattr().
It is then returned by ovl_create() to lookup_open(), which casts it to
an invalid dentry pointer, that can be further read or written by the
lookup_open() callers.

The uninitialized value is returned when all the xattr on the file
are ovl_is_private_xattr(), which is actually a successful case,
therefore we initialize |error| with 0.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Roy Yang <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]> # 4.1

---

The bug seem to date back to at least v4.1 where the annotation has been
introduced (i.e. the compilers started noticing error could be used
before being initialized). I hovever didn't try to prove that the
problem is actually reproducible on such ancient kernels. We've seen it
on a real machine running v4.4 as well.

v2:
-- Per Vivek Goyal's suggestion, changed |error| to be 0
---
fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
index 9709cf22cab3..07e0d1961e96 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ int ovl_copy_xattr(struct dentry *old, struct dentry *new)
{
ssize_t list_size, size, value_size = 0;
char *buf, *name, *value = NULL;
- int uninitialized_var(error);
+ int error = 0;
size_t slen;

if (!(old->d_inode->i_opflags & IOP_XATTR) ||
--
2.27.0.278.ge193c7cf3a9-goog


2020-06-04 09:25:04

by Miklos Szeredi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovl: explicitly initialize error in ovl_copy_xattr()

On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:43 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Under certain circumstances (we found this out running Docker on a
> Clang-built kernel with CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL) ovl_copy_xattr() may
> return uninitialized value of |error| from ovl_copy_xattr().
> It is then returned by ovl_create() to lookup_open(), which casts it to
> an invalid dentry pointer, that can be further read or written by the
> lookup_open() callers.
>
> The uninitialized value is returned when all the xattr on the file
> are ovl_is_private_xattr(), which is actually a successful case,
> therefore we initialize |error| with 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> Cc: Roy Yang <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]> # 4.1
>
> ---
>
> The bug seem to date back to at least v4.1 where the annotation has been
> introduced (i.e. the compilers started noticing error could be used
> before being initialized). I hovever didn't try to prove that the
> problem is actually reproducible on such ancient kernels. We've seen it
> on a real machine running v4.4 as well.
>
> v2:
> -- Per Vivek Goyal's suggestion, changed |error| to be 0

Thanks, applied patch posted here (with your signed-off as well, since
the patch is the same...):

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/874ks212uj.fsf@m5Zedd9JOGzJrf0/

Miklos

2020-06-04 16:00:22

by Kees Cook

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovl: explicitly initialize error in ovl_copy_xattr()

On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 10:42:45AM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> Under certain circumstances (we found this out running Docker on a
> Clang-built kernel with CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL) ovl_copy_xattr() may
> return uninitialized value of |error| from ovl_copy_xattr().
> It is then returned by ovl_create() to lookup_open(), which casts it to
> an invalid dentry pointer, that can be further read or written by the
> lookup_open() callers.
>
> The uninitialized value is returned when all the xattr on the file
> are ovl_is_private_xattr(), which is actually a successful case,
> therefore we initialize |error| with 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> Cc: Roy Yang <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]> # 4.1

Please include a Fixes (more below) and Link tags for details to help
guide backporting, then you don't need to bother with with "# 4.1",
the -stable tools will figure it out with a "Fixes" tag.

Thanks for the v2!

Link: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1050405
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>

> The bug seem to date back to at least v4.1 where the annotation has been
> introduced (i.e. the compilers started noticing error could be used
> before being initialized). I hovever didn't try to prove that the
> problem is actually reproducible on such ancient kernels. We've seen it
> on a real machine running v4.4 as well.

It seems like it came from this, but that's v4.5:

Fixes: e4ad29fa0d22 ("ovl: use a minimal buffer in ovl_copy_xattr")

What did you find in v4.1? It looks like error isn't uninitialized in
v4.1:

int ovl_copy_xattr(struct dentry *old, struct dentry *new)
{
ssize_t list_size, size;
char *buf, *name, *value;
int error;

if (!old->d_inode->i_op->getxattr ||
!new->d_inode->i_op->getxattr)
return 0;

list_size = vfs_listxattr(old, NULL, 0);
if (list_size <= 0) {
if (list_size == -EOPNOTSUPP)
return 0;
return list_size;
}

buf = kzalloc(list_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buf)
return -ENOMEM;

error = -ENOMEM;
...

But v4.1.52 backported the above patch (e4ad29fa0d22), which is why I
don't try to figure these things out manually. Once we find the commit,
the tools will figure it out. I think you just need:

Fixes: e4ad29fa0d22 ("ovl: use a minimal buffer in ovl_copy_xattr")
Cc: [email protected]

and things like v4.1.52 will get fixed (if anyone is actually doing
updates for v4.1.z any more...)

--
Kees Cook

2020-06-04 16:03:53

by Kees Cook

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovl: explicitly initialize error in ovl_copy_xattr()

On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 10:57:24AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:43 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Under certain circumstances (we found this out running Docker on a
> > Clang-built kernel with CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL) ovl_copy_xattr() may
> > return uninitialized value of |error| from ovl_copy_xattr().
> > It is then returned by ovl_create() to lookup_open(), which casts it to
> > an invalid dentry pointer, that can be further read or written by the
> > lookup_open() callers.
> >
> > The uninitialized value is returned when all the xattr on the file
> > are ovl_is_private_xattr(), which is actually a successful case,
> > therefore we initialize |error| with 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Roy Yang <[email protected]>
> > Cc: <[email protected]> # 4.1
> >
> > ---
> >
> > The bug seem to date back to at least v4.1 where the annotation has been
> > introduced (i.e. the compilers started noticing error could be used
> > before being initialized). I hovever didn't try to prove that the
> > problem is actually reproducible on such ancient kernels. We've seen it
> > on a real machine running v4.4 as well.
> >
> > v2:
> > -- Per Vivek Goyal's suggestion, changed |error| to be 0
>
> Thanks, applied patch posted here (with your signed-off as well, since
> the patch is the same...):
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/874ks212uj.fsf@m5Zedd9JOGzJrf0/

Can you please add:

Link: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1050405
Fixes: e4ad29fa0d22 ("ovl: use a minimal buffer in ovl_copy_xattr")
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>

(and adjust the CC field to drop the "# 4.1" so tools can figure it
out?)

Thanks!

--
Kees Cook

2020-06-05 09:48:57

by Alexander Potapenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovl: explicitly initialize error in ovl_copy_xattr()

On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:57 PM Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 10:42:45AM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> > Under certain circumstances (we found this out running Docker on a
> > Clang-built kernel with CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL) ovl_copy_xattr() may
> > return uninitialized value of |error| from ovl_copy_xattr().
> > It is then returned by ovl_create() to lookup_open(), which casts it to
> > an invalid dentry pointer, that can be further read or written by the
> > lookup_open() callers.
> >
> > The uninitialized value is returned when all the xattr on the file
> > are ovl_is_private_xattr(), which is actually a successful case,
> > therefore we initialize |error| with 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Roy Yang <[email protected]>
> > Cc: <[email protected]> # 4.1
>
> Please include a Fixes (more below) and Link tags for details to help
> guide backporting, then you don't need to bother with with "# 4.1",
> the -stable tools will figure it out with a "Fixes" tag.
>
> Thanks for the v2!
>
> Link: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1050405
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
>
> > The bug seem to date back to at least v4.1 where the annotation has been
> > introduced (i.e. the compilers started noticing error could be used
> > before being initialized). I hovever didn't try to prove that the
> > problem is actually reproducible on such ancient kernels. We've seen it
> > on a real machine running v4.4 as well.
>
> It seems like it came from this, but that's v4.5:
>
> Fixes: e4ad29fa0d22 ("ovl: use a minimal buffer in ovl_copy_xattr")

https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1050405 mentions v4.4.212.
Your patch could've been slipped into that kernel as well.

> What did you find in v4.1? It looks like error isn't uninitialized in
> v4.1:

The annotation appeared first in
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.1.18/source/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c#L27,
does that count as 4.1 or 4.2?

> But v4.1.52 backported the above patch (e4ad29fa0d22), which is why I
> don't try to figure these things out manually. Once we find the commit,
> the tools will figure it out. I think you just need:
>
> Fixes: e4ad29fa0d22 ("ovl: use a minimal buffer in ovl_copy_xattr")
> Cc: [email protected]

Sounds good!

2020-06-05 09:57:21

by Miklos Szeredi

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovl: explicitly initialize error in ovl_copy_xattr()

On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:57 PM Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 10:42:45AM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> > Under certain circumstances (we found this out running Docker on a
> > Clang-built kernel with CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL) ovl_copy_xattr() may
> > return uninitialized value of |error| from ovl_copy_xattr().
> > It is then returned by ovl_create() to lookup_open(), which casts it to
> > an invalid dentry pointer, that can be further read or written by the
> > lookup_open() callers.
> >
> > The uninitialized value is returned when all the xattr on the file
> > are ovl_is_private_xattr(), which is actually a successful case,
> > therefore we initialize |error| with 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Roy Yang <[email protected]>
> > Cc: <[email protected]> # 4.1
>
> Please include a Fixes (more below) and Link tags for details to help
> guide backporting, then you don't need to bother with with "# 4.1",
> the -stable tools will figure it out with a "Fixes" tag.
>
> Thanks for the v2!
>
> Link: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1050405
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
>
> > The bug seem to date back to at least v4.1 where the annotation has been
> > introduced (i.e. the compilers started noticing error could be used
> > before being initialized). I hovever didn't try to prove that the
> > problem is actually reproducible on such ancient kernels. We've seen it
> > on a real machine running v4.4 as well.
>
> It seems like it came from this, but that's v4.5:
>
> Fixes: e4ad29fa0d22 ("ovl: use a minimal buffer in ovl_copy_xattr")


I believe it's actually:

Fixes: 0956254a2d5b ("ovl: don't copy up opaqueness")

That patch added the ovl_is_private_xattr() check in ovl_copy_xattr(),
without which 'error' was always initilalized.

Thanks,
Miklos