From: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Hi,
The patch set just includes two tiny fixes for fuse_resend(). Patch #1
replaces __set_bit() by set_bit() to set FR_PENDING atomically. Patch #2
clears FR_SENT when moving requests from processing lists to pending
list.
Please check the individual patches for more details. And comments are
always welcome.
Hou Tao (2):
fuse: set FR_PENDING atomically in fuse_resend()
fuse: clear FR_SENT when re-adding requests into pending list
fs/fuse/dev.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.29.2
From: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
The following warning was reported by lee bruce:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 8264 at fs/fuse/dev.c:300
fuse_request_end+0x685/0x7e0 fs/fuse/dev.c:300
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 8264 Comm: ab2 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
RIP: 0010:fuse_request_end+0x685/0x7e0 fs/fuse/dev.c:300
......
Call Trace:
<TASK>
fuse_dev_do_read.constprop.0+0xd36/0x1dd0 fs/fuse/dev.c:1334
fuse_dev_read+0x166/0x200 fs/fuse/dev.c:1367
call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2104 [inline]
new_sync_read fs/read_write.c:395 [inline]
vfs_read+0x85b/0xba0 fs/read_write.c:476
ksys_read+0x12f/0x260 fs/read_write.c:619
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xce/0x260 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
......
</TASK>
The warning is due to the FUSE_NOTIFY_RESEND notify sent by the write()
syscall in the reproducer program and it happens as follows:
(1) calls fuse_dev_read() to read the INIT request
The read succeeds. During the read, bit FR_SENT will be set on the
request.
(2) calls fuse_dev_write() to send an USE_NOTIFY_RESEND notify
The resend notify will resend all processing requests, so the INIT
request is moved from processing list to pending list again.
(3) calls fuse_dev_read() with an invalid output address
fuse_dev_read() will try to copy the same INIT request to the output
address, but it will fail due to the invalid address, so the INIT
request is ended and triggers the warning in fuse_request_end().
Fix it by clearing FR_SENT when re-adding requests into pending list.
Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
Reported-by: xingwei lee <[email protected]>
Reported-by: yue sun <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/[email protected]/T/#m091614e5ea2af403b259e7cea6a49e51b9ee07a7
Fixes: 760eac73f9f69 ("fuse: Introduce a new notification type for resend pending requests")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index 8eb2ce7c0b012..9eb191b5c4de1 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1814,6 +1814,7 @@ static void fuse_resend(struct fuse_conn *fc)
list_for_each_entry_safe(req, next, &to_queue, list) {
set_bit(FR_PENDING, &req->flags);
+ clear_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags);
/* mark the request as resend request */
req->in.h.unique |= FUSE_UNIQUE_RESEND;
}
--
2.29.2
From: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
When fuse_resend() moves the requests from processing lists to pending
list, it uses __set_bit() to set FR_PENDING bit in req->flags.
Using __set_bit() is not safe, because other functions may update
req->flags concurrently (e.g., request_wait_answer() may call
set_bit(FR_INTERRUPTED, &flags)).
Fix it by using set_bit() instead.
Fixes: 760eac73f9f69 ("fuse: Introduce a new notification type for resend pending requests")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
index 3ec8bb5e68ff5..8eb2ce7c0b012 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1813,7 +1813,7 @@ static void fuse_resend(struct fuse_conn *fc)
spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(req, next, &to_queue, list) {
- __set_bit(FR_PENDING, &req->flags);
+ set_bit(FR_PENDING, &req->flags);
/* mark the request as resend request */
req->in.h.unique |= FUSE_UNIQUE_RESEND;
}
--
2.29.2
On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 14:21, Hou Tao <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
>
> Hi,
>
> The patch set just includes two tiny fixes for fuse_resend(). Patch #1
> replaces __set_bit() by set_bit() to set FR_PENDING atomically. Patch #2
> clears FR_SENT when moving requests from processing lists to pending
> list.
>
> Please check the individual patches for more details. And comments are
> always welcome.
Applied, thanks.
Miklos