2019-09-22 19:29:23

by Anatoly Pugachev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: latest git kernel (v5.3-11506-gf7c3bf8fa7e5) does not compile

On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 2:38 PM Masahiro Yamada
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Anatoly,
>
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 5:33 PM Anatoly Pugachev <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:13 AM Anatoly Pugachev <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > Latest git kernel does not compile for me:
> > >
> > > ~/linux-2.6$ git desc
> > > v5.3-11506-gf7c3bf8fa7e5
> > >
> > > ~/linux-2.6$ make
> > > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> > > <stdin>:1511:2: warning: #warning syscall clone3 not implemented [-Wcpp]
> > > CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
> > > CHK include/generated/compile.h
> > > CC arch/sparc/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.o
> > > unrecognized e_machine 18 arch/sparc/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.o
> > > arch/sparc/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.o: failed
> > > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:266:
> > > arch/sparc/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.o] Error 1
> > > make[2]: *** Deleting file 'arch/sparc/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.o'
> > > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:509: arch/sparc/vdso] Error 2
> > > make: *** [Makefile:1667: arch/sparc] Error
> > >
> > > but I was able to compile successfully v5.3-10169-g574cc4539762
>
>
> Thanks for the report, and apology for the breakage.
>
> Please check this patch.
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1130469/
>
> I hope it will fix the build error.


It does. Thanks Masahiro!


2019-09-26 09:13:41

by Masahiro Yamada

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: latest git kernel (v5.3-11506-gf7c3bf8fa7e5) does not compile

Hi Anatoly,


On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 9:14 PM Anatoly Pugachev <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Thanks for the report, and apology for the breakage.
> >
> > Please check this patch.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1130469/
> >
> > I hope it will fix the build error.
>
>
> It does. Thanks Masahiro!

Thanks for testing!

Could you please give your Tested-by in the reply to my patch?

With Tested-by from the reporter,
I think the maintainer will be able to pick up the patch
more confidently.

Thanks.



--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada