On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:22:16AM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, 1 February 2013, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 02/01/2013 02:49 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> >> On 1 February 2013 09:54, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The entire series is merged in Greg's driver-core tree [1] and I
> >>>> presume all other associated patches would also be picked up by him.
> >>>> Isn't it Greg?
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git
> >>>
> >>> The Tegra serial driver went through Greg's TTY tree. I assume that goes
> >>> direct to Linus not through driver-core.git first.
> >>
> >> Right. But AFAIK for this specific change he has carried the patches
> >> in the device-core tree irrespective of the subsystem.
> >
> > Yes, but the Tegra serial driver is new for 3.9, and hence does not yet
> > exist in driver-core.git.
> >
>
> Oh ok. Then probably we can have this patch only after 3.9-rc1 is out.
Yes, Stephen can take this patch now.
On 03/15/2013 10:38 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:22:16AM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday, 1 February 2013, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 02/01/2013 02:49 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>>> On 1 February 2013 09:54, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The entire series is merged in Greg's driver-core tree [1] and I
>>>>>> presume all other associated patches would also be picked up by him.
>>>>>> Isn't it Greg?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git
>>>>>
>>>>> The Tegra serial driver went through Greg's TTY tree. I assume that goes
>>>>> direct to Linus not through driver-core.git first.
>>>>
>>>> Right. But AFAIK for this specific change he has carried the patches
>>>> in the device-core tree irrespective of the subsystem.
>>>
>>> Yes, but the Tegra serial driver is new for 3.9, and hence does not yet
>>> exist in driver-core.git.
>>>
>>
>> Oh ok. Then probably we can have this patch only after 3.9-rc1 is out.
>
> Yes, Stephen can take this patch now.
There's no need for me to take the patch I think; now that 3.9-rc1 is
out, the serial and driver core trees all have whatever dependencies
this series needed, so any patches can go through their usual trees, I
think... (Sorry, the context of this discussion was little while ago).
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:14:01AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/15/2013 10:38 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:22:16AM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Friday, 1 February 2013, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> On 02/01/2013 02:49 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> >>>> On 1 February 2013 09:54, Stephen Warren <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The entire series is merged in Greg's driver-core tree [1] and I
> >>>>>> presume all other associated patches would also be picked up by him.
> >>>>>> Isn't it Greg?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Tegra serial driver went through Greg's TTY tree. I assume that goes
> >>>>> direct to Linus not through driver-core.git first.
> >>>>
> >>>> Right. But AFAIK for this specific change he has carried the patches
> >>>> in the device-core tree irrespective of the subsystem.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, but the Tegra serial driver is new for 3.9, and hence does not yet
> >>> exist in driver-core.git.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Oh ok. Then probably we can have this patch only after 3.9-rc1 is out.
> >
> > Yes, Stephen can take this patch now.
>
> There's no need for me to take the patch I think; now that 3.9-rc1 is
> out, the serial and driver core trees all have whatever dependencies
> this series needed, so any patches can go through their usual trees, I
> think... (Sorry, the context of this discussion was little while ago).
Ok, can someone please resend the serial patch then? I dropped it.
thanks,
greg k-h
>> There's no need for me to take the patch I think; now that 3.9-rc1 is
>> out, the serial and driver core trees all have whatever dependencies
>> this series needed, so any patches can go through their usual trees, I
>> think... (Sorry, the context of this discussion was little while ago).
>
> Ok, can someone please resend the serial patch then? I dropped it.
>
You already applied the resent version of this patch.
Thanks Greg :)
--
With warm regards,
Sachin