2023-09-22 16:14:21

by kernel test robot

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: net/core/xdp.c:725:5: error: no previous declaration for 'bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp'

Hi Stanislav,

FYI, the error/warning still remains.

tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head: 27bbf45eae9ca98877a2d52a92a188147cd61b07
commit: 3d76a4d3d4e591af3e789698affaad88a5a8e8ab bpf: XDP metadata RX kfuncs
date: 8 months ago
config: x86_64-sof-customedconfig-avs-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230923/[email protected]/config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230923/[email protected]/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> net/core/xdp.c:725:5: error: no previous declaration for 'bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp' [-Werror=missing-declarations]
int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx, u64 *timestamp)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/xdp.c:737:5: error: no previous declaration for 'bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash' [-Werror=missing-declarations]
int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx, u32 *hash)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors


vim +/bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp +725 net/core/xdp.c

713
714 __diag_push();
715 __diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes",
716 "Global functions as their definitions will be in vmlinux BTF");
717
718 /**
719 * bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp - Read XDP frame RX timestamp.
720 * @ctx: XDP context pointer.
721 * @timestamp: Return value pointer.
722 *
723 * Returns 0 on success or ``-errno`` on error.
724 */
> 725 int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx, u64 *timestamp)
726 {
727 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
728 }
729
730 /**
731 * bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash - Read XDP frame RX hash.
732 * @ctx: XDP context pointer.
733 * @hash: Return value pointer.
734 *
735 * Returns 0 on success or ``-errno`` on error.
736 */
> 737 int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx, u32 *hash)
738 {
739 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
740 }
741

--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


2023-09-22 22:07:31

by Stanislav Fomichev

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: net/core/xdp.c:725:5: error: no previous declaration for 'bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp'

On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 9:12 AM kernel test robot <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Stanislav,
>
> FYI, the error/warning still remains.
>
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> head: 27bbf45eae9ca98877a2d52a92a188147cd61b07
> commit: 3d76a4d3d4e591af3e789698affaad88a5a8e8ab bpf: XDP metadata RX kfuncs
> date: 8 months ago
> config: x86_64-sof-customedconfig-avs-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230923/[email protected]/config)
> compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230923/[email protected]/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> net/core/xdp.c:725:5: error: no previous declaration for 'bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp' [-Werror=missing-declarations]
> int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx, u64 *timestamp)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> net/core/xdp.c:737:5: error: no previous declaration for 'bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash' [-Werror=missing-declarations]
> int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx, u32 *hash)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

I don't think I'm doing anything special for these kfuncs, so, in
theory, the rest of them should also have the same warning.
Should we add another __diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-declarations", ...)
to kfuncs preamble?
I remember there was a discussion about introducing
BEGIN_KFUNC/END_KFUNC, but I don't think it went anywhere?


> vim +/bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp +725 net/core/xdp.c
>
> 713
> 714 __diag_push();
> 715 __diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes",
> 716 "Global functions as their definitions will be in vmlinux BTF");
> 717
> 718 /**
> 719 * bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp - Read XDP frame RX timestamp.
> 720 * @ctx: XDP context pointer.
> 721 * @timestamp: Return value pointer.
> 722 *
> 723 * Returns 0 on success or ``-errno`` on error.
> 724 */
> > 725 int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx, u64 *timestamp)
> 726 {
> 727 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 728 }
> 729
> 730 /**
> 731 * bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash - Read XDP frame RX hash.
> 732 * @ctx: XDP context pointer.
> 733 * @hash: Return value pointer.
> 734 *
> 735 * Returns 0 on success or ``-errno`` on error.
> 736 */
> > 737 int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx, u32 *hash)
> 738 {
> 739 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 740 }
> 741
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki