We have per struct proto ->bpf_bypass_getsockopt callback
to filter out bpf socket cgroup getsockopt hook from being called.
It seems worthwhile to add analogical helper for SOL_SOCKET
level socket options. First user will be SO_PEERPIDFD.
This patch was born as a result of discussion around a new SCM_PIDFD interface:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 8 +++++---
include/net/sock.h | 1 +
net/core/sock.c | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
index 57e9e109257e..97d8a49b35bf 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
@@ -387,10 +387,12 @@ static inline bool cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(struct sock *sk,
int __ret = retval; \
if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT) && \
cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock, CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)) \
- if (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
- !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
+ if (((level != SOL_SOCKET) || \
+ !sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(level, optname)) && \
+ (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
+ !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
tcp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
- level, optname)) \
+ level, optname))) \
__ret = __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt( \
sock, level, optname, optval, optlen, \
max_optlen, retval); \
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 8b7ed7167243..530d6d22f42d 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -1847,6 +1847,7 @@ int sk_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
sockptr_t optval, sockptr_t optlen);
int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int op,
char __user *optval, int __user *optlen);
+bool sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname);
int sock_gettstamp(struct socket *sock, void __user *userstamp,
bool timeval, bool time32);
struct sk_buff *sock_alloc_send_pskb(struct sock *sk, unsigned long header_len,
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 5440e67bcfe3..194a423eb6e5 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1963,6 +1963,11 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
USER_SOCKPTR(optlen));
}
+bool sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* Initialize an sk_lock.
*
--
2.34.1
From: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 17:22:16 +0200
> We have per struct proto ->bpf_bypass_getsockopt callback
> to filter out bpf socket cgroup getsockopt hook from being called.
>
> It seems worthwhile to add analogical helper for SOL_SOCKET
> level socket options. First user will be SO_PEERPIDFD.
I think this patch should be posted within the series below as
there is no real user of sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt() for now.
Thanks,
Kuniyuki
>
> This patch was born as a result of discussion around a new SCM_PIDFD interface:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 8 +++++---
> include/net/sock.h | 1 +
> net/core/sock.c | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> index 57e9e109257e..97d8a49b35bf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> @@ -387,10 +387,12 @@ static inline bool cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(struct sock *sk,
> int __ret = retval; \
> if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT) && \
> cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock, CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)) \
> - if (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
> - !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> + if (((level != SOL_SOCKET) || \
> + !sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(level, optname)) && \
> + (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
> + !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> tcp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> - level, optname)) \
> + level, optname))) \
> __ret = __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt( \
> sock, level, optname, optval, optlen, \
> max_optlen, retval); \
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index 8b7ed7167243..530d6d22f42d 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -1847,6 +1847,7 @@ int sk_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> sockptr_t optval, sockptr_t optlen);
> int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int op,
> char __user *optval, int __user *optlen);
> +bool sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname);
> int sock_gettstamp(struct socket *sock, void __user *userstamp,
> bool timeval, bool time32);
> struct sk_buff *sock_alloc_send_pskb(struct sock *sk, unsigned long header_len,
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 5440e67bcfe3..194a423eb6e5 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -1963,6 +1963,11 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
> USER_SOCKPTR(optlen));
> }
>
> +bool sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Initialize an sk_lock.
> *
> --
> 2.34.1
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 8:23 AM Alexander Mikhalitsyn
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> We have per struct proto ->bpf_bypass_getsockopt callback
> to filter out bpf socket cgroup getsockopt hook from being called.
>
> It seems worthwhile to add analogical helper for SOL_SOCKET
> level socket options. First user will be SO_PEERPIDFD.
>
> This patch was born as a result of discussion around a new SCM_PIDFD interface:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 8 +++++---
> include/net/sock.h | 1 +
> net/core/sock.c | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> index 57e9e109257e..97d8a49b35bf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> @@ -387,10 +387,12 @@ static inline bool cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(struct sock *sk,
> int __ret = retval; \
> if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT) && \
> cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock, CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)) \
> - if (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
> - !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> + if (((level != SOL_SOCKET) || \
> + !sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(level, optname)) && \
> + (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
Any reason we are not putting this into bpf_bypass_getsockopt for
af_unix struct proto? SO_PEERPIDFD seems relevant only for af_unix?
> + !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> tcp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> - level, optname)) \
> + level, optname))) \
> __ret = __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt( \
> sock, level, optname, optval, optlen, \
> max_optlen, retval); \
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index 8b7ed7167243..530d6d22f42d 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -1847,6 +1847,7 @@ int sk_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> sockptr_t optval, sockptr_t optlen);
> int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int op,
> char __user *optval, int __user *optlen);
> +bool sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname);
> int sock_gettstamp(struct socket *sock, void __user *userstamp,
> bool timeval, bool time32);
> struct sk_buff *sock_alloc_send_pskb(struct sock *sk, unsigned long header_len,
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 5440e67bcfe3..194a423eb6e5 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -1963,6 +1963,11 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
> USER_SOCKPTR(optlen));
> }
>
> +bool sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Initialize an sk_lock.
> *
> --
> 2.34.1
>
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:31 PM Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 8:23 AM Alexander Mikhalitsyn
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > We have per struct proto ->bpf_bypass_getsockopt callback
> > to filter out bpf socket cgroup getsockopt hook from being called.
> >
> > It seems worthwhile to add analogical helper for SOL_SOCKET
> > level socket options. First user will be SO_PEERPIDFD.
> >
> > This patch was born as a result of discussion around a new SCM_PIDFD interface:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> >
> > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 8 +++++---
> > include/net/sock.h | 1 +
> > net/core/sock.c | 5 +++++
> > 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> > index 57e9e109257e..97d8a49b35bf 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> > @@ -387,10 +387,12 @@ static inline bool cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(struct sock *sk,
> > int __ret = retval; \
> > if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT) && \
> > cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock, CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)) \
> > - if (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
> > - !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> > + if (((level != SOL_SOCKET) || \
> > + !sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(level, optname)) && \
> > + (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
>
> Any reason we are not putting this into bpf_bypass_getsockopt for
> af_unix struct proto? SO_PEERPIDFD seems relevant only for af_unix?
Yes, that should work perfectly well. The reason why I'm going this
way is that we are
declaring all SOL_SOCKET-level options in the net/core/sock.c which is
not specific to any address family.
It seems reasonable to have a way to filter out getsockopt for these
options too.
But I'm not insisting on that way.
Kind regards,
Alex
>
> > + !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> > tcp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> > - level, optname)) \
> > + level, optname))) \
> > __ret = __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt( \
> > sock, level, optname, optval, optlen, \
> > max_optlen, retval); \
> > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> > index 8b7ed7167243..530d6d22f42d 100644
> > --- a/include/net/sock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> > @@ -1847,6 +1847,7 @@ int sk_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> > sockptr_t optval, sockptr_t optlen);
> > int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int op,
> > char __user *optval, int __user *optlen);
> > +bool sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname);
> > int sock_gettstamp(struct socket *sock, void __user *userstamp,
> > bool timeval, bool time32);
> > struct sk_buff *sock_alloc_send_pskb(struct sock *sk, unsigned long header_len,
> > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> > index 5440e67bcfe3..194a423eb6e5 100644
> > --- a/net/core/sock.c
> > +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> > @@ -1963,6 +1963,11 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
> > USER_SOCKPTR(optlen));
> > }
> >
> > +bool sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname)
> > +{
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Initialize an sk_lock.
> > *
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 2:41 PM Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:31 PM Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 8:23 AM Alexander Mikhalitsyn
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > We have per struct proto ->bpf_bypass_getsockopt callback
> > > to filter out bpf socket cgroup getsockopt hook from being called.
> > >
> > > It seems worthwhile to add analogical helper for SOL_SOCKET
> > > level socket options. First user will be SO_PEERPIDFD.
> > >
> > > This patch was born as a result of discussion around a new SCM_PIDFD interface:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> > >
> > > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 8 +++++---
> > > include/net/sock.h | 1 +
> > > net/core/sock.c | 5 +++++
> > > 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> > > index 57e9e109257e..97d8a49b35bf 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> > > @@ -387,10 +387,12 @@ static inline bool cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(struct sock *sk,
> > > int __ret = retval; \
> > > if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT) && \
> > > cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock, CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)) \
> > > - if (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
> > > - !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> > > + if (((level != SOL_SOCKET) || \
> > > + !sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(level, optname)) && \
> > > + (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
> >
> > Any reason we are not putting this into bpf_bypass_getsockopt for
> > af_unix struct proto? SO_PEERPIDFD seems relevant only for af_unix?
>
> Yes, that should work perfectly well. The reason why I'm going this
> way is that we are
> declaring all SOL_SOCKET-level options in the net/core/sock.c which is
> not specific to any address family.
> It seems reasonable to have a way to filter out getsockopt for these
> options too.
>
> But I'm not insisting on that way.
Yeah, let's move it into af_unix struct proto for now. That should
avoid adding extra conditionals for a few places that care about
performance (tcp zerocopy fastpath).
If we'd ever need to filter out generic SOL_SOCKET level options that
apply for all sockets, we might put (and copy-paste) them in the
respective {tcp,udp,unix,etc}_bpf_bypass_getsockopt.
> Kind regards,
> Alex
>
> >
> > > + !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> > > tcp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> > > - level, optname)) \
> > > + level, optname))) \
> > > __ret = __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt( \
> > > sock, level, optname, optval, optlen, \
> > > max_optlen, retval); \
> > > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> > > index 8b7ed7167243..530d6d22f42d 100644
> > > --- a/include/net/sock.h
> > > +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> > > @@ -1847,6 +1847,7 @@ int sk_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> > > sockptr_t optval, sockptr_t optlen);
> > > int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int op,
> > > char __user *optval, int __user *optlen);
> > > +bool sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname);
> > > int sock_gettstamp(struct socket *sock, void __user *userstamp,
> > > bool timeval, bool time32);
> > > struct sk_buff *sock_alloc_send_pskb(struct sock *sk, unsigned long header_len,
> > > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> > > index 5440e67bcfe3..194a423eb6e5 100644
> > > --- a/net/core/sock.c
> > > +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> > > @@ -1963,6 +1963,11 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
> > > USER_SOCKPTR(optlen));
> > > }
> > >
> > > +bool sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname)
> > > +{
> > > + return false;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * Initialize an sk_lock.
> > > *
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:58 PM Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 2:41 PM Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:31 PM Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 8:23 AM Alexander Mikhalitsyn
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We have per struct proto ->bpf_bypass_getsockopt callback
> > > > to filter out bpf socket cgroup getsockopt hook from being called.
> > > >
> > > > It seems worthwhile to add analogical helper for SOL_SOCKET
> > > > level socket options. First user will be SO_PEERPIDFD.
> > > >
> > > > This patch was born as a result of discussion around a new SCM_PIDFD interface:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > > include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 8 +++++---
> > > > include/net/sock.h | 1 +
> > > > net/core/sock.c | 5 +++++
> > > > 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> > > > index 57e9e109257e..97d8a49b35bf 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> > > > @@ -387,10 +387,12 @@ static inline bool cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(struct sock *sk,
> > > > int __ret = retval; \
> > > > if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT) && \
> > > > cgroup_bpf_sock_enabled(sock, CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT)) \
> > > > - if (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
> > > > - !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> > > > + if (((level != SOL_SOCKET) || \
> > > > + !sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(level, optname)) && \
> > > > + (!(sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt || \
> > >
> > > Any reason we are not putting this into bpf_bypass_getsockopt for
> > > af_unix struct proto? SO_PEERPIDFD seems relevant only for af_unix?
> >
> > Yes, that should work perfectly well. The reason why I'm going this
> > way is that we are
> > declaring all SOL_SOCKET-level options in the net/core/sock.c which is
> > not specific to any address family.
> > It seems reasonable to have a way to filter out getsockopt for these
> > options too.
> >
> > But I'm not insisting on that way.
>
> Yeah, let's move it into af_unix struct proto for now. That should
> avoid adding extra conditionals for a few places that care about
> performance (tcp zerocopy fastpath).
> If we'd ever need to filter out generic SOL_SOCKET level options that
> apply for all sockets, we might put (and copy-paste) them in the
> respective {tcp,udp,unix,etc}_bpf_bypass_getsockopt.
Will do.
Thanks!
Kind regards,
Alex
>
> > Kind regards,
> > Alex
> >
> > >
> > > > + !INDIRECT_CALL_INET_1((sock)->sk_prot->bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> > > > tcp_bpf_bypass_getsockopt, \
> > > > - level, optname)) \
> > > > + level, optname))) \
> > > > __ret = __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt( \
> > > > sock, level, optname, optval, optlen, \
> > > > max_optlen, retval); \
> > > > diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> > > > index 8b7ed7167243..530d6d22f42d 100644
> > > > --- a/include/net/sock.h
> > > > +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> > > > @@ -1847,6 +1847,7 @@ int sk_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
> > > > sockptr_t optval, sockptr_t optlen);
> > > > int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int op,
> > > > char __user *optval, int __user *optlen);
> > > > +bool sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname);
> > > > int sock_gettstamp(struct socket *sock, void __user *userstamp,
> > > > bool timeval, bool time32);
> > > > struct sk_buff *sock_alloc_send_pskb(struct sock *sk, unsigned long header_len,
> > > > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> > > > index 5440e67bcfe3..194a423eb6e5 100644
> > > > --- a/net/core/sock.c
> > > > +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> > > > @@ -1963,6 +1963,11 @@ int sock_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
> > > > USER_SOCKPTR(optlen));
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +bool sock_bpf_bypass_getsockopt(int level, int optname)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return false;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * Initialize an sk_lock.
> > > > *
> > > > --
> > > > 2.34.1
> > > >