On 16/10/2022 11:01, Siarhei Volkau wrote:
> This will be used from the devicetree bindings to specify the clocks
> that should be obtained from the jz4755-cgu driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Siarhei Volkau <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../dt-bindings/clock/ingenic,jz4755-cgu.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/ingenic,jz4755-cgu.h
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/ingenic,jz4755-cgu.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/ingenic,jz4755-cgu.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..1ac13d61b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/ingenic,jz4755-cgu.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-2-Clause) */
Why did you choose 2.0+?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
вс, 16 окт. 2022 г. в 18:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<[email protected]>:
> Why did you choose 2.0+?
It's the first time that I need to choose a license, so it's a bit
confusing what
side effects they have, especially in that particular case.
What do you recommend?
BR,
Siarhei
On 16/10/2022 14:21, Siarhei Volkau wrote:
> вс, 16 окт. 2022 г. в 18:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <[email protected]>:
>
>> Why did you choose 2.0+?
>
> It's the first time that I need to choose a license, so it's a bit
> confusing what
> side effects they have, especially in that particular case.
>
> What do you recommend?
Choice was fine, just not common so I was just wondering. You can keep
it but usually we choose what the checkpatch is asking for - so GPL-2.0
(only )or BSD-2-clause.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 09:21:18PM +0300, Siarhei Volkau wrote:
> вс, 16 окт. 2022 г. в 18:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <[email protected]>:
>
> > Why did you choose 2.0+?
>
> It's the first time that I need to choose a license, so it's a bit
> confusing what
> side effects they have, especially in that particular case.
>
> What do you recommend?
Are you fine with GPLv4, GPLv5? Considering they haven't been written, I
wouldn't be.
Rob