2013-04-04 06:25:59

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] powerpc: cpufreq: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq

On 3 April 2013 16:00, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 15:00 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 31 March 2013 09:33, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:

>> > Benjamin/Paul/Olof,
>> >
>> > Any comments on this?
>>
>> Ping!!
>
> I'm on vacation until end of April. No objection to the patch but
> somebody needs to test it.

Hi,

Can somebody else from powerpc world give it a try?

OR

@Rafael: Can we get this pushed in linux-next as is and then people would
be forced to test it and in case there are any complains, i will fix them or
you can revert it?


2013-04-04 06:30:47

by Amit Kucheria

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] powerpc: cpufreq: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 3 April 2013 16:00, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 15:00 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> On 31 March 2013 09:33, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> > Benjamin/Paul/Olof,
>>> >
>>> > Any comments on this?
>>>
>>> Ping!!
>>
>> I'm on vacation until end of April. No objection to the patch but
>> somebody needs to test it.
>
> Hi,
>
> Can somebody else from powerpc world give it a try?

Deepthi, can you help?

> OR
>
> @Rafael: Can we get this pushed in linux-next as is and then people would
> be forced to test it and in case there are any complains, i will fix them or
> you can revert it?

2013-04-11 07:00:00

by Olof Johansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] powerpc: cpufreq: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq

On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:55:56AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 3 April 2013 16:00, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 15:00 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> On 31 March 2013 09:33, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > Benjamin/Paul/Olof,
> >> >
> >> > Any comments on this?
> >>
> >> Ping!!
> >
> > I'm on vacation until end of April. No objection to the patch but
> > somebody needs to test it.
>
> Hi,
>
> Can somebody else from powerpc world give it a try?
>
> OR
>
> @Rafael: Can we get this pushed in linux-next as is and then people would
> be forced to test it and in case there are any complains, i will fix them or
> you can revert it?


That's not very nice this late in the staging cycle. Give the powerpc
guys a little more time than a single day to come back with test results,
please.


-Olof

2013-04-11 07:02:54

by Viresh Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] powerpc: cpufreq: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq

On 11 April 2013 12:29, Olof Johansson <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's not very nice this late in the staging cycle. Give the powerpc
> guys a little more time than a single day to come back with test results,
> please.

Yes we are waiting indefinitely for an Ack from powerpc guys.. If we can
get a Ack soon, we will get it in 3.10 otherwise next cycle.

2013-04-11 20:37:14

by Rafael J. Wysocki

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] powerpc: cpufreq: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq

On Thursday, April 11, 2013 12:32:50 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 11 April 2013 12:29, Olof Johansson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > That's not very nice this late in the staging cycle. Give the powerpc
> > guys a little more time than a single day to come back with test results,
> > please.
>
> Yes we are waiting indefinitely for an Ack from powerpc guys.. If we can
> get a Ack soon, we will get it in 3.10 otherwise next cycle.

Well, I'll be traveling from Saturday morning onwards until the end of the
next week and my window for taking stuff into v3.10 closes in 16 hours.
Whatever is not ready (i.e. ACKed in this particular case) before that time,
won't be taken.

Thanks,
Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.