From: 0xAX <[email protected]>
The memblock_add_region() and memblock_reserve_region do not nothing specific
before the call of the memblock_add_range(), only print debug output.
We can do the same in the memblock_add() and memblock_reserve() since both
memblock_add_region() and memblock_reserve_region are not used by anybody
outside of memblock.c and the memblock_{add,reserve}() have the same set of
flags and nids.
Since the memblock_add_region() and memblock_reserve_region() anyway will be
inlined, there will not be functional changes, but will improve code readability
a little.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <[email protected]>
---
mm/memblock.c | 28 ++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index b570ddd..3b93daa 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -606,22 +606,14 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, nid, 0);
}
-static int __init_memblock memblock_add_region(phys_addr_t base,
- phys_addr_t size,
- int nid,
- unsigned long flags)
+int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
{
memblock_dbg("memblock_add: [%#016llx-%#016llx] flags %#02lx %pF\n",
(unsigned long long)base,
(unsigned long long)base + size - 1,
- flags, (void *)_RET_IP_);
-
- return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, nid, flags);
-}
+ 0UL, (void *)_RET_IP_);
-int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
-{
- return memblock_add_region(base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
+ return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
}
/**
@@ -732,22 +724,14 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
return memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
}
-static int __init_memblock memblock_reserve_region(phys_addr_t base,
- phys_addr_t size,
- int nid,
- unsigned long flags)
+int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
{
memblock_dbg("memblock_reserve: [%#016llx-%#016llx] flags %#02lx %pF\n",
(unsigned long long)base,
(unsigned long long)base + size - 1,
- flags, (void *)_RET_IP_);
-
- return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, nid, flags);
-}
+ 0UL, (void *)_RET_IP_);
-int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
-{
- return memblock_reserve_region(base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
+ return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
}
/**
--
2.8.0.rc3.212.g1f992f2.dirty
On 17 April 2016 at 21:14, Alexander Kuleshov <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: 0xAX <[email protected]>
>
> The memblock_add_region() and memblock_reserve_region do not nothing specific
> before the call of the memblock_add_range(), only print debug output.
>
> We can do the same in the memblock_add() and memblock_reserve() since both
> memblock_add_region() and memblock_reserve_region are not used by anybody
> outside of memblock.c and the memblock_{add,reserve}() have the same set of
> flags and nids.
>
> Since the memblock_add_region() and memblock_reserve_region() anyway will be
> inlined, there will not be functional changes, but will improve code readability
> a little.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
> ---
> mm/memblock.c | 28 ++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index b570ddd..3b93daa 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -606,22 +606,14 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
> return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, nid, 0);
> }
>
> -static int __init_memblock memblock_add_region(phys_addr_t base,
> - phys_addr_t size,
> - int nid,
> - unsigned long flags)
> +int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> memblock_dbg("memblock_add: [%#016llx-%#016llx] flags %#02lx %pF\n",
> (unsigned long long)base,
> (unsigned long long)base + size - 1,
> - flags, (void *)_RET_IP_);
> -
> - return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, nid, flags);
> -}
> + 0UL, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>
> -int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> -{
> - return memblock_add_region(base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
> + return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -732,22 +724,14 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> return memblock_remove_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
> }
>
> -static int __init_memblock memblock_reserve_region(phys_addr_t base,
> - phys_addr_t size,
> - int nid,
> - unsigned long flags)
> +int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> memblock_dbg("memblock_reserve: [%#016llx-%#016llx] flags %#02lx %pF\n",
> (unsigned long long)base,
> (unsigned long long)base + size - 1,
> - flags, (void *)_RET_IP_);
> -
> - return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, nid, flags);
> -}
> + 0UL, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>
> -int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> -{
> - return memblock_reserve_region(base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
> + return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.8.0.rc3.212.g1f992f2.dirty
>