Hello postmaster,
Any thoughts on [email protected]?
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 3:14 AM Nick Clifton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> >>>> Would it be possible to setup:
> >>>> [email protected]
>
> >>> s/linux-tooling/linux-toolchains (better plural toolchains)
>
> >> FWIW FreeBSD names it "freebsd-toolchain".
> >> NetBSD names it "tech-toolchain".
> >>
> >> I'd slightly prefer the singular form.
>
> > OK with singular form.
> >
> > I was thinking of GNU and LLVM toolchain*s* - that's why the plural.
>
> Personally I prefer the plural too, but it is not a big issue.
>
> I am however delighted that it looks like this idea will go ahead.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Does anyone know who's behind [email protected]? Maybe I can
email them directly if perhaps they don't check this email often?
(Benefit of the doubt)
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:49 PM Nick Desaulniers
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello postmaster,
> Any thoughts on [email protected]?
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 3:14 AM Nick Clifton <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > >>>> Would it be possible to setup:
> > >>>> [email protected]
> >
> > >>> s/linux-tooling/linux-toolchains (better plural toolchains)
> >
> > >> FWIW FreeBSD names it "freebsd-toolchain".
> > >> NetBSD names it "tech-toolchain".
> > >>
> > >> I'd slightly prefer the singular form.
> >
> > > OK with singular form.
> > >
> > > I was thinking of GNU and LLVM toolchain*s* - that's why the plural.
> >
> > Personally I prefer the plural too, but it is not a big issue.
> >
> > I am however delighted that it looks like this idea will go ahead.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> ~Nick Desaulniers
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:25:40AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Does anyone know who's behind [email protected]? Maybe I can
> email them directly if perhaps they don't check this email often?
> (Benefit of the doubt)
davem iirc.
Hi David,
Apologies if this request has crossed your desk already; I know my
unreads in my inbox seems to have doubled this week somehow...(should
I send them all to /dev/null? I think I should.)
From Linux Plumbers conf Binutils BoF, Peter had the idea of setting a
toolchain agnostic email list, and from the thread folks seem content
with [email protected]. Is this something you would be
able to help set up for us? If not, is this something you can help
delegate to someone else to set up (any pointers who I should talk to
in that regard)?
The full thread:
https://groups.google.com/g/clang-built-linux/c/GLEkFKlDXfo (sorry I
didn't cc lkml sooner for a proper lore link; I myself am ~1 more bug
away from switching away from google groups forever).
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
From: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:29:38 -0700
> [email protected]
Created.
Hi Guys,
>> [email protected]
> Created.
I have been able to subscribe to this list, so it looks like thunderbirds are go...
Cheers
Nick
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 12:26 AM David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:29:38 -0700
>
> > [email protected]
>
> Created.
>
I am subscribed, too.
Will there be a(n)...?
* archive (for example marc.info)
* patchwork url
- Sedat -
[1] https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1170
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 02:01:13PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 12:26 AM David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> > From: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
> > Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:29:38 -0700
> > > [email protected]
> >
> > Created.
>
> I am subscribed, too.
>
> Will there be a(n)...?
>
> * archive (for example marc.info)
A lore archive would be good?
> * patchwork url
We do not have any repositories associated with this list, and there
won't be many patches anyway, so patchwork will only be useful as a kind
of mail archive. I can ask to set one up though, if people want that?
Segher
On 10/2/20 10:22 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 02:01:13PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 12:26 AM David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> From: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:29:38 -0700
>>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> Created.
>>
>> I am subscribed, too.
>>
>> Will there be a(n)...?
>>
>> * archive (for example marc.info)
>
> A lore archive would be good?
That has already been requested.
>
>> * patchwork url
>
> We do not have any repositories associated with this list, and there
> won't be many patches anyway, so patchwork will only be useful as a kind
> of mail archive. I can ask to set one up though, if people want that?
>
>
> Segher
>
--
~Randy
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 10:37 AM Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 10/2/20 10:22 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 02:01:13PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 12:26 AM David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> From: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
> >>> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 12:29:38 -0700
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>
> >>> Created.
> >>
> >> I am subscribed, too.
> >>
> >> Will there be a(n)...?
> >>
> >> * archive (for example marc.info)
> >
> > A lore archive would be good?
>
> That has already been requested.
Hi David,
Thank you for setting up the mailing list. I appreciate it. Now that
the lore archive has been set up
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-toolchains/), would you mind linking to
it from http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html under archives of
linux-toolchains?
>
> >
> >> * patchwork url
> >
> > We do not have any repositories associated with this list, and there
> > won't be many patches anyway, so patchwork will only be useful as a kind
> > of mail archive. I can ask to set one up though, if people want that?
Personally, I haven't been using patchwork. I know some maintainers
use it to keep track of reviews of lots of patches, but other than
that is there a major use case for patchwork I'm missing?
> >
> >
> > Segher
> >
>
>
> --
> ~Randy
>
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
From: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:50:35 -0700
> Now that the lore archive has been set up
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-toolchains/), would you mind linking to
> it from http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html under archives of
> linux-toolchains?
Done.