This patch is used to add vendor prefix
for Micron Technology Inc in the
vendor-prefixes.txt file.
Micron Technology, Inc. is an American
multinational corporation based in Boise,
Idaho, best known for producing many forms
of semiconductor devices. This includes DRAM,
SDRAM, flash memory, eMMC and SSDs.
Signed-off-by: bean huo <[email protected]>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
index 723999d..a7bbf6e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ maxim Maxim Integrated Products
mediatek MediaTek Inc.
micrel Micrel Inc.
microchip Microchip Technology Inc.
+micron Micron Technology Inc.
mitsubishi Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
mosaixtech Mosaix Technologies, Inc.
moxa Moxa
--
1.7.9.5
>This patch is used to add vendor prefix for
>Micron Technology Inc in the vendor-prefixes.txt file.
>Micron Technology, Inc. is an American
>multinational corporation based in Boise,
>Idaho, best known for producing many forms
>of semiconductor devices. This includes DRAM,
>SDRAM, flash memory, eMMC and SSDs.
>Signed-off-by: bean huo <[email protected]>
Dear linux developer:
Is there maintainer in this mail list? Can give me a result for
this simple patch?if can be accepted or not? Or give me some suggections?
It has been long time.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:28 AM, bpqw <[email protected]> wrote:
>>This patch is used to add vendor prefix for
>>Micron Technology Inc in the vendor-prefixes.txt file.
>
>>Micron Technology, Inc. is an American
>>multinational corporation based in Boise,
>>Idaho, best known for producing many forms
>>of semiconductor devices. This includes DRAM,
>>SDRAM, flash memory, eMMC and SSDs.
>
>>Signed-off-by: bean huo <[email protected]>
>
> Dear linux developer:
>
> Is there maintainer in this mail list? Can give me a result for
> this simple patch?if can be accepted or not? Or give me some suggections?
> It has been long time.
It has been 6 minutes since you sent the last version.
I see you have fixed the line length although I'm not sure why you
made it so short. 72 characters is the norm, but up to 80 is fine. You
have not fixed the authorship as Mark pointed out.
Also, please version your patches (i.e. [PATCH v2]).
Rob