This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
accessed outside of this driver file.
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Coardos <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
index 767c33ae3213..d89da7300ddd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
@@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ static int sama5d2_piobu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!piobu)
return -ENOMEM;
- platform_set_drvdata(pdev, piobu);
piobu->chip.label = pdev->name;
piobu->chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
piobu->chip.owner = THIS_MODULE,
--
2.34.1
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 9:25 PM Andrei Coardos <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
> platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
> the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
> accessed outside of this driver file.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 8:25 PM Andrei Coardos <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
> platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
> the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
> accessed outside of this driver file.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Coardos <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
> index 767c33ae3213..d89da7300ddd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
> @@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ static int sama5d2_piobu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!piobu)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, piobu);
> piobu->chip.label = pdev->name;
> piobu->chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
> piobu->chip.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Applied, thanks!
Bartosz
On 28.07.2023 21:25, Andrei Coardos wrote:
> This function call was found to be unnecessary as there is no equivalent
> platform_get_drvdata() call to access the private data of the driver. Also,
> the private data is defined in this driver, so there is no risk of it being
> accessed outside of this driver file.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Coardos <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
> index 767c33ae3213..d89da7300ddd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sama5d2-piobu.c
> @@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ static int sama5d2_piobu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!piobu)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, piobu);
> piobu->chip.label = pdev->name;
> piobu->chip.parent = &pdev->dev;
> piobu->chip.owner = THIS_MODULE,