From: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
Fixing errors related to the usage of do {} while (0) loop
in single statement macros, trailing semicolon in macros and
trailing whitespace.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/skein/skein_block.c | 17 ++++-------------
drivers/staging/skein/skein_generic.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/skein/skein_block.c b/drivers/staging/skein/skein_block.c
index 66261ab25c88..43a342372633 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/skein/skein_block.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/skein/skein_block.c
@@ -82,10 +82,7 @@ do { \
} while (0)
#else
/* looping version */
-#define R256(p0, p1, p2, p3, ROT, r_num) \
-do { \
- ROUND256(p0, p1, p2, p3, ROT, r_num); \
-} while (0)
+#define R256(p0, p1, p2, p3, ROT, r_num) ROUND256(p0, p1, p2, p3, ROT, r_num)
#define I256(R) \
do { \
@@ -174,9 +171,7 @@ do { \
#else /* looping version */
#define R512(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, ROT, r_num) \
-do { \
- ROUND512(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, ROT, r_num); \
-} while (0)
+ ROUND512(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, ROT, r_num)
#define I512(R) \
do { \
@@ -263,10 +258,8 @@ do { \
#if SKEIN_UNROLL_1024 == 0
#define R1024(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, p9, pA, pB, pC, pD, pE, pF, \
ROT, rn) \
-do { \
ROUND1024(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, p9, pA, pB, pC, pD, pE, \
- pF, ROT, rn); \
-} while (0)
+ pF, ROT, rn)
#define I1024(R) \
do { \
@@ -291,10 +284,8 @@ do { \
#else /* looping version */
#define R1024(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, p9, pA, pB, pC, pD, pE, pF, \
ROT, rn) \
-do { \
ROUND1024(p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8, p9, pA, pB, pC, pD, pE, \
- pF, ROT, rn); \
-} while (0)
+ pF, ROT, rn)
#define I1024(R) \
do { \
diff --git a/drivers/staging/skein/skein_generic.c b/drivers/staging/skein/skein_generic.c
index 85bd7d0168b0..899078f1b8bc 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/skein/skein_generic.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/skein/skein_generic.c
@@ -191,7 +191,6 @@ static int __init skein_generic_init(void)
return 0;
-
unreg512:
crypto_unregister_shash(&alg512);
unreg256:
--
1.9.1
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 05:09:48PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
>
> Fixing errors related to the usage of do {} while (0) loop
> in single statement macros, trailing semicolon in macros and
> trailing whitespace.
That's a lot of things all at once, please break this up into individual
patches, each one only doing one thing.
thanks,
greg k-h
Mathieu,
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 05:09:48PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
>
> Fixing errors related to the usage of do {} while (0) loop
> in single statement macros, trailing semicolon in macros and
> trailing whitespace.
Huh. iirc, I added those do {} while(0)s to keep checkpatch happy.
Either it's gotten smarter, or something is off.
At any rate, the whole macro menagerie in here concerns me a bit and I'm
reluctant to change it until I have some time to refresh my memory on
what this code is doing.
It would be helpful if you could give scripts/objdiff a try on the
before and after effects of your patch. If the object code doesn't
change, then we can be more confident that the patch is just style
changes. Please also check when SKEIN_UNROLL_* is set/unset.
I really should put the patch series together to move this driver out of
staging. Then maybe folks will stop running checkpatch against it :-)
thx,
Jason.
On 21 December 2014 at 18:57, Jason Cooper <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mathieu,
>
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 05:09:48PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>> From: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
>>
>> Fixing errors related to the usage of do {} while (0) loop
>> in single statement macros, trailing semicolon in macros and
>> trailing whitespace.
>
> Huh. iirc, I added those do {} while(0)s to keep checkpatch happy.
> Either it's gotten smarter, or something is off.
Checkpatch apparently changed it's mind.
>
> At any rate, the whole macro menagerie in here concerns me a bit and I'm
> reluctant to change it until I have some time to refresh my memory on
> what this code is doing.
>
> It would be helpful if you could give scripts/objdiff a try on the
> before and after effects of your patch. If the object code doesn't
> change, then we can be more confident that the patch is just style
> changes. Please also check when SKEIN_UNROLL_* is set/unset.
You got it.
>
> I really should put the patch series together to move this driver out of
> staging. Then maybe folks will stop running checkpatch against it :-)
>
> thx,
>
> Jason.