2019-09-27 08:30:01

by Wanpeng Li

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: Don't shrink/grow vCPU halt_poll_ns if host side polling is disabled

From: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>

Don't waste cycles to shrink/grow vCPU halt_poll_ns if host
side polling is disabled.

Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index e6de315..b368be4 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2359,20 +2359,22 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(vcpu);
block_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start);

- if (!vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu))
- shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
- else if (halt_poll_ns) {
- if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
- ;
- /* we had a long block, shrink polling */
- else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
+ if (!kvm_arch_no_poll(vcpu)) {
+ if (!vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu))
shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
- /* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */
- else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns &&
- block_ns < halt_poll_ns)
- grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
- } else
- vcpu->halt_poll_ns = 0;
+ else if (halt_poll_ns) {
+ if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
+ ;
+ /* we had a long block, shrink polling */
+ else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
+ shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
+ /* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */
+ else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns &&
+ block_ns < halt_poll_ns)
+ grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
+ } else
+ vcpu->halt_poll_ns = 0;
+ }

trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(block_ns, waited, vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu));
kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish(vcpu);
--
2.7.4


2019-09-27 14:43:19

by Sean Christopherson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Don't shrink/grow vCPU halt_poll_ns if host side polling is disabled

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 04:27:02PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
>
> Don't waste cycles to shrink/grow vCPU halt_poll_ns if host
> side polling is disabled.
>
> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
> ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index e6de315..b368be4 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2359,20 +2359,22 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(vcpu);
> block_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start);
>
> - if (!vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu))
> - shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> - else if (halt_poll_ns) {
> - if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
> - ;
> - /* we had a long block, shrink polling */
> - else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
> + if (!kvm_arch_no_poll(vcpu)) {

Can vcpu->halt_poll_ns be cached and used both here and in the similar
check above? E.g.:

unsigned int vcpu_halt_poll_ns;

vcpu_halt_poll_ns = kvm_arch_no_poll(vcpu) ? 0 : vcpu->halt_poll_ns;

if (vcpu_halt_poll_ns) {
...
}

> + if (!vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu))
> shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> - /* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */
> - else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns &&
> - block_ns < halt_poll_ns)
> - grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> - } else
> - vcpu->halt_poll_ns = 0;
> + else if (halt_poll_ns) {
> + if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
> + ;
> + /* we had a long block, shrink polling */
> + else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
> + shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> + /* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */
> + else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns &&
> + block_ns < halt_poll_ns)
> + grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> + } else
> + vcpu->halt_poll_ns = 0;


Not your code, but it'd be a good time to add braces to the 'if' and
'else'. Per Documentation/process/coding-style.rst:

Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.

...

This does not apply if only one branch of a conditional statement is a single
statement; in the latter case use braces in both branches:

if (condition) {
do_this();
do_that();
} else {
otherwise();
}


> + }
>
> trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(block_ns, waited, vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu));
> kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish(vcpu);
> --
> 2.7.4
>

2019-09-27 17:25:09

by Marcelo Tosatti

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Don't shrink/grow vCPU halt_poll_ns if host side polling is disabled

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 04:27:02PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
>
> Don't waste cycles to shrink/grow vCPU halt_poll_ns if host
> side polling is disabled.
>
> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
> ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index e6de315..b368be4 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2359,20 +2359,22 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(vcpu);
> block_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start);
>
> - if (!vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu))
> - shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> - else if (halt_poll_ns) {
> - if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
> - ;
> - /* we had a long block, shrink polling */
> - else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
> + if (!kvm_arch_no_poll(vcpu)) {
> + if (!vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu))
> shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> - /* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */
> - else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns &&
> - block_ns < halt_poll_ns)
> - grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> - } else
> - vcpu->halt_poll_ns = 0;
> + else if (halt_poll_ns) {
> + if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
> + ;
> + /* we had a long block, shrink polling */
> + else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
> + shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> + /* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */
> + else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns &&
> + block_ns < halt_poll_ns)
> + grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> + } else
> + vcpu->halt_poll_ns = 0;
> + }
>
> trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(block_ns, waited, vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu));
> kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish(vcpu);
> --
> 2.7.4

Looks good.

2019-09-29 01:00:57

by Wanpeng Li

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Don't shrink/grow vCPU halt_poll_ns if host side polling is disabled

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 22:42, Sean Christopherson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 04:27:02PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > From: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
> >
> > Don't waste cycles to shrink/grow vCPU halt_poll_ns if host
> > side polling is disabled.
> >
> > Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > index e6de315..b368be4 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > @@ -2359,20 +2359,22 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(vcpu);
> > block_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start);
> >
> > - if (!vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu))
> > - shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> > - else if (halt_poll_ns) {
> > - if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
> > - ;
> > - /* we had a long block, shrink polling */
> > - else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
> > + if (!kvm_arch_no_poll(vcpu)) {
>
> Can vcpu->halt_poll_ns be cached and used both here and in the similar
> check above? E.g.:
>
> unsigned int vcpu_halt_poll_ns;
>
> vcpu_halt_poll_ns = kvm_arch_no_poll(vcpu) ? 0 : vcpu->halt_poll_ns;
>
> if (vcpu_halt_poll_ns) {
> ...
> }

This is not correct, !kvm_arch_no_poll(vcpu) && vcpu->halt_poll_ns ==
0, you will stop grow.

>
> > + if (!vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu))
> > shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> > - /* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */
> > - else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns &&
> > - block_ns < halt_poll_ns)
> > - grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> > - } else
> > - vcpu->halt_poll_ns = 0;
> > + else if (halt_poll_ns) {
> > + if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
> > + ;
> > + /* we had a long block, shrink polling */
> > + else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
> > + shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> > + /* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */
> > + else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns &&
> > + block_ns < halt_poll_ns)
> > + grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> > + } else
> > + vcpu->halt_poll_ns = 0;
>
>
> Not your code,

Not the truth. :)

>but it'd be a good time to add braces to the 'if' and
> 'else'. Per Documentation/process/coding-style.rst:
>
> Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.
>
> ...
>
> This does not apply if only one branch of a conditional statement is a single
> statement; in the latter case use braces in both branches:
>
> if (condition) {
> do_this();
> do_that();
> } else {
> otherwise();
> }

Will do in v2.

Wanpeng

2019-09-29 01:06:45

by Wanpeng Li

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Don't shrink/grow vCPU halt_poll_ns if host side polling is disabled

On Sat, 28 Sep 2019 at 01:24, Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 04:27:02PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > From: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
> >
> > Don't waste cycles to shrink/grow vCPU halt_poll_ns if host
> > side polling is disabled.
> >
> > Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > index e6de315..b368be4 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > @@ -2359,20 +2359,22 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(vcpu);
> > block_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start);
> >
> > - if (!vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu))
> > - shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> > - else if (halt_poll_ns) {
> > - if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
> > - ;
> > - /* we had a long block, shrink polling */
> > - else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
> > + if (!kvm_arch_no_poll(vcpu)) {
> > + if (!vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu))
> > shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> > - /* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */
> > - else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns &&
> > - block_ns < halt_poll_ns)
> > - grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> > - } else
> > - vcpu->halt_poll_ns = 0;
> > + else if (halt_poll_ns) {
> > + if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
> > + ;
> > + /* we had a long block, shrink polling */
> > + else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
> > + shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> > + /* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */
> > + else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns &&
> > + block_ns < halt_poll_ns)
> > + grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
> > + } else
> > + vcpu->halt_poll_ns = 0;
> > + }
> >
> > trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(block_ns, waited, vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu));
> > kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish(vcpu);
> > --
> > 2.7.4
>
> Looks good.

I will add your ACK in v2.

Wanpeng