2022-04-13 16:16:34

by David Howells

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH net] rxrpc: Restore removed timer deletion

A recent patch[1] from Eric Dumazet flipped the order in which the
keepalive timer and the keepalive worker were cancelled in order to fix a
syzbot reported issue[2]. Unfortunately, this enables the mirror image bug
whereby the timer races with rxrpc_exit_net(), restarting the worker after
it has been cancelled:

CPU 1 CPU 2
=============== =====================
if (rxnet->live)
<INTERRUPT>
rxnet->live = false;
cancel_work_sync(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_work);
rxrpc_queue_work(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_work);
del_timer_sync(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_timer);

Fix this by restoring the removed del_timer_sync() so that we try to remove
the timer twice. If the timer runs again, it should see ->live == false
and not restart the worker.

Fixes: 1946014ca3b1 ("rxrpc: fix a race in rxrpc_exit_net()")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
cc: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
cc: Marc Dionne <[email protected]>
cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/ [1]
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=724378c4bb58f703b09a [2]
---

net/rxrpc/net_ns.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/net_ns.c b/net/rxrpc/net_ns.c
index f15d6942da45..cc7e30733feb 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/net_ns.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/net_ns.c
@@ -113,7 +113,9 @@ static __net_exit void rxrpc_exit_net(struct net *net)
struct rxrpc_net *rxnet = rxrpc_net(net);

rxnet->live = false;
+ del_timer_sync(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_timer);
cancel_work_sync(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_work);
+ /* Remove the timer again as the worker may have restarted it. */
del_timer_sync(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_timer);
rxrpc_destroy_all_calls(rxnet);
rxrpc_destroy_all_connections(rxnet);



2022-04-14 13:44:00

by Eric Dumazet

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rxrpc: Restore removed timer deletion

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:41 AM David Howells <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > ok... so we have a timer and a work queue, both activating each other
> > in kind of a ping pong ?
>
> Yes. I want to emit regular keepalive pokes.
>
> > Any particular reason not using delayed works ?
>
> Because there's a race between starting the keepalive timer when a new peer is
> added and when the keepalive worker is resetting the timer for the next peer
> in the list. This is why I'm using timer_reduce(). delayed_work doesn't
> currently have such a facility. It's not simple to add because
> try_to_grab_pending() as called from mod_delayed_work_on() cancels the timer -
> which is not what I want it to do.
>

SGTM, thanks !

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>

2022-04-14 16:05:23

by Eric Dumazet

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rxrpc: Restore removed timer deletion

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 3:16 AM David Howells <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> A recent patch[1] from Eric Dumazet flipped the order in which the
> keepalive timer and the keepalive worker were cancelled in order to fix a
> syzbot reported issue[2]. Unfortunately, this enables the mirror image bug
> whereby the timer races with rxrpc_exit_net(), restarting the worker after
> it has been cancelled:
>
> CPU 1 CPU 2
> =============== =====================
> if (rxnet->live)
> <INTERRUPT>
> rxnet->live = false;
> cancel_work_sync(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_work);
> rxrpc_queue_work(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_work);
> del_timer_sync(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_timer);
>
> Fix this by restoring the removed del_timer_sync() so that we try to remove
> the timer twice. If the timer runs again, it should see ->live == false
> and not restart the worker.
>
> Fixes: 1946014ca3b1 ("rxrpc: fix a race in rxrpc_exit_net()")
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
> cc: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
> cc: Marc Dionne <[email protected]>
> cc: [email protected]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/ [1]
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=724378c4bb58f703b09a [2]
> ---
>
> net/rxrpc/net_ns.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/net_ns.c b/net/rxrpc/net_ns.c
> index f15d6942da45..cc7e30733feb 100644
> --- a/net/rxrpc/net_ns.c
> +++ b/net/rxrpc/net_ns.c
> @@ -113,7 +113,9 @@ static __net_exit void rxrpc_exit_net(struct net *net)
> struct rxrpc_net *rxnet = rxrpc_net(net);
>
> rxnet->live = false;
> + del_timer_sync(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_timer);
> cancel_work_sync(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_work);
> + /* Remove the timer again as the worker may have restarted it. */
> del_timer_sync(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_timer);
> rxrpc_destroy_all_calls(rxnet);
> rxrpc_destroy_all_connections(rxnet);
>
>

ok... so we have a timer and a work queue, both activating each other
in kind of a ping pong ?

Any particular reason not using delayed works ?

Thanks.

2022-04-16 00:23:45

by patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rxrpc: Restore removed timer deletion

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
by David S. Miller <[email protected]>:

On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 11:16:25 +0100 you wrote:
> A recent patch[1] from Eric Dumazet flipped the order in which the
> keepalive timer and the keepalive worker were cancelled in order to fix a
> syzbot reported issue[2]. Unfortunately, this enables the mirror image bug
> whereby the timer races with rxrpc_exit_net(), restarting the worker after
> it has been cancelled:
>
> CPU 1 CPU 2
> =============== =====================
> if (rxnet->live)
> <INTERRUPT>
> rxnet->live = false;
> cancel_work_sync(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_work);
> rxrpc_queue_work(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_work);
> del_timer_sync(&rxnet->peer_keepalive_timer);
>
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
- [net] rxrpc: Restore removed timer deletion
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/ee3b0826b476

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html


2022-04-16 01:52:22

by David Howells

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rxrpc: Restore removed timer deletion

Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> wrote:

> ok... so we have a timer and a work queue, both activating each other
> in kind of a ping pong ?

Yes. I want to emit regular keepalive pokes.

> Any particular reason not using delayed works ?

Because there's a race between starting the keepalive timer when a new peer is
added and when the keepalive worker is resetting the timer for the next peer
in the list. This is why I'm using timer_reduce(). delayed_work doesn't
currently have such a facility. It's not simple to add because
try_to_grab_pending() as called from mod_delayed_work_on() cancels the timer -
which is not what I want it to do.

David