2013-07-14 19:07:09

by Pekka Enberg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [GIT PULL] SLAB changes for v3.11-rc0

Hi Linus,

Please pull the latest SLAB tree from:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/penberg/linux.git slab/for-linus

Highlights:

- Fix for boot-time problems on some architectures due to
init_lock_keys() not respecting kmalloc_caches boundaries
(Christoph Lameter)

- CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL requested by RT folks (Joonsoo Kim)

- Fix for excessive slab freelist draining (Wanpeng Li)

- SLUB and SLOB cleanups and fixes (various people)

The tree also contains Christoph's unification work that I merged in
too late had to revert because it broke things. We'll try again for
v3.12.

Pekka

------------------>
The following changes since commit 21884a83b2192a00885d7244a1dda32debd2fbc7:

Merge branch 'timers-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip (2013-07-06 14:09:38 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/penberg/linux.git slab/for-linus

Christoph Lameter (4):
slob: Rework #ifdeffery in slab.h
slab: fix init_lock_keys
mm/sl[aou]b: Move kmalloc_node functions to common code
mm/sl[aou]b: Move kmalloc definitions to slab.h

Joonsoo Kim (2):
slub: do not put a slab to cpu partial list when cpu_partial is 0
slub: Make cpu partial slab support configurable

Michael Opdenacker (1):
slab: add kmalloc() to kernel API documentation

Pekka Enberg (2):
Revert "mm/sl[aou]b: Move kmalloc definitions to slab.h"
Revert "mm/sl[aou]b: Move kmalloc_node functions to common code"

Sasha Levin (1):
slob: use DIV_ROUND_UP where possible

Steven Rostedt (2):
slob: Check for NULL pointer before calling ctor()
slub: Check for page NULL before doing the node_match check

Wanpeng Li (6):
mm/slab: Fix drain freelist excessively
mm/slab: Sharing s_next and s_stop between slab and slub
mm/slab: Fix /proc/slabinfo unwriteable for slab
mm/slub: Drop unnecessary nr_partials
mm/slub: Use node_nr_slabs and node_nr_objs in get_slabinfo
mm/slab: Give s_next and s_stop slab-specific names

Zhouping Liu (1):
mm, slab: moved kmem_cache_alloc_node comment to correct place

include/linux/slab.h | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
include/linux/slob_def.h | 8 ------
init/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++
mm/slab.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
mm/slab.h | 3 ++
mm/slab_common.c | 18 ++++++++++----
mm/slob.c | 4 +-
mm/slub.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
8 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)


2013-07-14 19:58:43

by Linus Torvalds

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SLAB changes for v3.11-rc0

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Pekka Enberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The tree also contains Christoph's unification work that I merged in
> too late had to revert because it broke things. We'll try again for
> v3.12.

Ugh. I'll merge the commits leading up to that, but not the actual
broken try at unification at all.

There's just one one-liner patch in between the broken commits and
their reverts, I don't see the point of pulling that part at all, and
I can take the one-liner separately.

Linus

2013-07-15 06:12:35

by Pekka Enberg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SLAB changes for v3.11-rc0

On 07/14/2013 10:58 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Pekka Enberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> The tree also contains Christoph's unification work that I merged in
>> too late had to revert because it broke things. We'll try again for
>> v3.12.
>
> Ugh. I'll merge the commits leading up to that, but not the actual
> broken try at unification at all.
>
> There's just one one-liner patch in between the broken commits and
> their reverts, I don't see the point of pulling that part at all, and
> I can take the one-liner separately.

OK, I'll requeue the oneliner commit. Thanks!

Pekka

2013-07-15 06:22:28

by Pekka Enberg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SLAB changes for v3.11-rc0

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Pekka Enberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Ugh. I'll merge the commits leading up to that, but not the actual
>> broken try at unification at all.
>>
>> There's just one one-liner patch in between the broken commits and
>> their reverts, I don't see the point of pulling that part at all, and
>> I can take the one-liner separately.
>
> OK, I'll requeue the oneliner commit. Thanks!

Oh, you picked it up yourself. Thanks Linus!

Pekka