The patchset supports RTC PCF2131 on board dts.
For the details, please check the patch commit log.
Joy Zou (1):
arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: add rtc PCF2131 support
.../boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
--
2.37.1
Support rtc PCF2131 on imx93-11x11-evk.
Signed-off-by: Joy Zou <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v4:
1. remove the sleep from the pinctrl-names.
Changes in v3:
1.adjust the indentation.
Changes in v2:
1. remove unnecessary status property.
---
.../boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
index 07e85a30a25f..bc3c9271d747 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
@@ -281,6 +281,23 @@ ldo5: LDO5 {
};
};
+&lpi2c3 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ clock-frequency = <400000>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
+ pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
+ status = "okay";
+
+ pcf2131: rtc@53 {
+ compatible = "nxp,pcf2131";
+ reg = <0x53>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&pcal6524>;
+ interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ };
+};
+
&iomuxc {
pinctrl_eqos: eqosgrp {
fsl,pins = <
@@ -343,6 +360,13 @@ MX93_PAD_I2C2_SDA__LPI2C2_SDA 0x40000b9e
>;
};
+ pinctrl_lpi2c3: lpi2c3grp {
+ fsl,pins = <
+ MX93_PAD_GPIO_IO28__LPI2C3_SDA 0x40000b9e
+ MX93_PAD_GPIO_IO29__LPI2C3_SCL 0x40000b9e
+ >;
+ };
+
pinctrl_pcal6524: pcal6524grp {
fsl,pins = <
MX93_PAD_CCM_CLKO2__GPIO3_IO27 0x31e
--
2.37.1
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 12:07 AM Joy Zou <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Support rtc PCF2131 on imx93-11x11-evk.
s/rtc/RTC
> +&lpi2c3 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
> + pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
Why is the pinctrl-1 still here?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
> Sent: 2024年4月17日 11:10
> To: Joy Zou <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; Frank Li <[email protected]>; Jacky Bai
> <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> dl-linux-imx <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: add rtc
> PCF2131 support
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 12:07 AM Joy Zou <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Support rtc PCF2131 on imx93-11x11-evk.
>
> s/rtc/RTC
Thanks for your comments!
Will change the format in next version.
>
> > +&lpi2c3 {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + clock-frequency = <400000>;
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
> > + pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
>
> Why is the pinctrl-1 still here?
Yeah, Sorry for forgetting to delete the pinctrl-1, will delete in next version.
BR
Joy Zou
Hi Joy,
On 24-04-17, Joy Zou wrote:
> Support rtc PCF2131 on imx93-11x11-evk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joy Zou <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> 1. remove the sleep from the pinctrl-names.
>
> Changes in v3:
> 1.adjust the indentation.
>
> Changes in v2:
> 1. remove unnecessary status property.
> ---
> .../boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> index 07e85a30a25f..bc3c9271d747 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> @@ -281,6 +281,23 @@ ldo5: LDO5 {
> };
> };
>
> +&lpi2c3 {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
while reading your patch I also noticed that you had to specify these
cells here. It is very common to specify it within the base dtsi file
imx93.dtsi. Can you please provde an extra patch which adds this to the
base dtsi followed by this patch, which of course do need to specify it
again.
Thanks you,
Marco
> + clock-frequency = <400000>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
> + pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_lpi2c3>;
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + pcf2131: rtc@53 {
> + compatible = "nxp,pcf2131";
> + reg = <0x53>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&pcal6524>;
> + interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
> + };
> +};
> +
> &iomuxc {
> pinctrl_eqos: eqosgrp {
> fsl,pins = <
> @@ -343,6 +360,13 @@ MX93_PAD_I2C2_SDA__LPI2C2_SDA 0x40000b9e
> >;
> };
>
> + pinctrl_lpi2c3: lpi2c3grp {
> + fsl,pins = <
> + MX93_PAD_GPIO_IO28__LPI2C3_SDA 0x40000b9e
> + MX93_PAD_GPIO_IO29__LPI2C3_SCL 0x40000b9e
> + >;
> + };
> +
> pinctrl_pcal6524: pcal6524grp {
> fsl,pins = <
> MX93_PAD_CCM_CLKO2__GPIO3_IO27 0x31e
> --
> 2.37.1
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marco Felsch <[email protected]>
> Sent: 2024??4??17?? 12:57
> To: Joy Zou <[email protected]>
> Cc: Frank Li <[email protected]>; Jacky Bai <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; dl-linux-imx
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: add rtc
> PCF2131 support
>
>
> Hi Joy,
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > index 07e85a30a25f..bc3c9271d747 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > @@ -281,6 +281,23 @@ ldo5: LDO5 {
> > };
> > };
> >
> > +&lpi2c3 {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
>
> while reading your patch I also noticed that you had to specify these cells
> here. It is very common to specify it within the base dtsi file imx93.dtsi. Can
> you please provde an extra patch which adds this to the base dtsi followed by
> this patch, which of course do need to specify it again.
>
> Thanks you,
> Marco
>
Thanks for your comments!
Have checked the base dtsi file imx93.dtsi. The these cells already existed.
The current cells is same with the lpi2c3 node in imx93.dtsi. So should remove
these cells in order to keep terse?
BR
Joy Zou
On 24-04-24, Joy Zou wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marco Felsch <[email protected]>
> > Sent: 2024年4月17日 12:57
> > To: Joy Zou <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Frank Li <[email protected]>; Jacky Bai <[email protected]>;
> > [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; dl-linux-imx
> > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: add rtc
> > PCF2131 support
> >
> >
> > Hi Joy,
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > index 07e85a30a25f..bc3c9271d747 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > @@ -281,6 +281,23 @@ ldo5: LDO5 {
> > > };
> > > };
> > >
> > > +&lpi2c3 {
> > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > + #size-cells = <0>;
> >
> > while reading your patch I also noticed that you had to specify these cells
> > here. It is very common to specify it within the base dtsi file imx93.dtsi. Can
> > you please provde an extra patch which adds this to the base dtsi followed by
> > this patch, which of course do need to specify it again.
> >
> > Thanks you,
> > Marco
> >
> Thanks for your comments!
> Have checked the base dtsi file imx93.dtsi. The these cells already existed.
You're right, not sure why I didn't saw it in the first place.
> The current cells is same with the lpi2c3 node in imx93.dtsi. So should remove
> these cells in order to keep terse?
Yes please remove it.
Regards,
Marco
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marco Felsch <[email protected]>
> Sent: 2024年4月24日 17:00
> To: Joy Zou <[email protected]>
> Cc: Frank Li <[email protected]>; Jacky Bai <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; dl-linux-imx
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: add rtc
> PCF2131 support
>
> On 24-04-24, Joy Zou wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > > index 07e85a30a25f..bc3c9271d747 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts
> > > > @@ -281,6 +281,23 @@ ldo5: LDO5 {
> > > > };
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > +&lpi2c3 {
> > > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > >
> > > while reading your patch I also noticed that you had to specify
> > > these cells here. It is very common to specify it within the base
> > > dtsi file imx93.dtsi. Can you please provde an extra patch which
> > > adds this to the base dtsi followed by this patch, which of course do need
> to specify it again.
> > >
> > > Thanks you,
> > > Marco
> > >
> > Thanks for your comments!
> > Have checked the base dtsi file imx93.dtsi. The these cells already existed.
>
> You're right, not sure why I didn't saw it in the first place.
>
> > The current cells is same with the lpi2c3 node in imx93.dtsi. So
> > should remove these cells in order to keep terse?
>
> Yes please remove it.
>
> Regards,
> Marco
Thanks for your comments!
Will change it in next version.
BR
Joy Zou