The RTC core properly handles RTC without .read_alarm and doesn't use it to
set alarms. .read_alarm can be safely dropped.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-imx-sc.c | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-imx-sc.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-imx-sc.c
index cc9fbab49999..814d516645e2 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-imx-sc.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-imx-sc.c
@@ -80,16 +80,6 @@ static int imx_sc_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enable)
return imx_scu_irq_group_enable(SC_IRQ_GROUP_RTC, SC_IRQ_RTC, enable);
}
-static int imx_sc_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
-{
- /*
- * SCU firmware does NOT provide read alarm API, but .read_alarm
- * callback is required by RTC framework to support alarm function,
- * so just return here.
- */
- return 0;
-}
-
static int imx_sc_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
{
struct imx_sc_msg_timer_rtc_set_alarm msg;
@@ -127,7 +117,6 @@ static int imx_sc_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
static const struct rtc_class_ops imx_sc_rtc_ops = {
.read_time = imx_sc_rtc_read_time,
.set_time = imx_sc_rtc_set_time,
- .read_alarm = imx_sc_rtc_read_alarm,
.set_alarm = imx_sc_rtc_set_alarm,
.alarm_irq_enable = imx_sc_rtc_alarm_irq_enable,
};
--
2.30.2
Hi Alexandre,
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 8:52 PM Alexandre Belloni
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The RTC core properly handles RTC without .read_alarm and doesn't use it to
> set alarms. .read_alarm can be safely dropped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>