2021-12-24 17:11:44

by Florian Fainelli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] SoC changes for 5.17

Hi Arnd, Olof,

On 12/23/2021 13:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I'm sending out the pull requests for 5.17 early, as I won't have access to
> my workstation for the next two weeks. With only 760 non-merge commits,
> this again feels quieter than the massive previous merge window, but the
> number of changed lines was actually slightly higher.
>
> There are very few changes aside from devicetree patches, most of
> which are for the i.MX, Tegra, Qualcomm, Apple, K3 and Aspeed
> platforms.
>
> We have a couple of new SoCs in existing families:
>
> - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1
> - Qualcomm Snapdragon SDX65
> - NXP i.MX8ULP
> - Texas Instruments j721s2
> - Renesas R-Car S4-8
>
> The time between product announcement and kernel support is fairly short
> for all of these, which is nice. In particular the two Snapdragons were only
> announced this month and are the current high end of Qualcomm's products.
> On the other end of the spectrum, we also add support for ST SPEAr320s,
> which was launched 10 years ago.
>
> Aside from the Arm chips, there is also a pull request for a new RISC-V SoC,
> the Starfive JH7100, including some of the basic drivers to make it boot.

There seems to half of the submitted Broadcom SoCs pull request missing
in this one, was there issues with those below:

defconfigs:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/

drivers:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/

Should I resend or fix something in those? Thanks!

Happy holidays!
--
Florian


2022-01-04 21:58:14

by Florian Fainelli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] SoC changes for 5.17

On 12/24/21 9:11 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Arnd, Olof,
>
> On 12/23/2021 13:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> I'm sending out the pull requests for 5.17 early, as I won't have
>> access to
>> my workstation for the next two weeks. With only 760 non-merge commits,
>> this again feels quieter than the massive previous merge window, but the
>> number of changed lines was actually slightly higher.
>>
>> There are very few changes aside from devicetree patches, most of
>> which are for the i.MX, Tegra, Qualcomm, Apple, K3 and Aspeed
>> platforms.
>>
>> We have a couple of new SoCs in existing families:
>>
>>   - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1
>>   - Qualcomm Snapdragon SDX65
>>   - NXP i.MX8ULP
>>   - Texas Instruments j721s2
>>   - Renesas R-Car S4-8
>>
>> The time between product announcement and kernel support is fairly short
>> for all of these, which is nice. In particular the two Snapdragons
>> were only
>> announced this month and are the current high end of Qualcomm's products.
>> On the other end of the spectrum, we also add support for ST SPEAr320s,
>> which was launched 10 years ago.
>>
>> Aside from the Arm chips, there is also a pull request for a new
>> RISC-V SoC,
>> the Starfive JH7100, including some of the basic drivers to make it boot.
>
> There seems to half of the submitted Broadcom SoCs pull request missing
> in this one, was there issues with those below:
>
> defconfigs:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/
>
>
> drivers:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/
>
>
> Should I resend or fix something in those? Thanks!


Arnd, Olof, do I need to resend the 3 pull requests mentioned above?
Thanks and happy new year.
--
Florian

2022-01-05 00:40:47

by Olof Johansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] SoC changes for 5.17

Hi Florian,

On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 1:58 PM Florian Fainelli <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 12/24/21 9:11 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > Hi Arnd, Olof,
> >
> > On 12/23/2021 13:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> I'm sending out the pull requests for 5.17 early, as I won't have
> >> access to
> >> my workstation for the next two weeks. With only 760 non-merge commits,
> >> this again feels quieter than the massive previous merge window, but the
> >> number of changed lines was actually slightly higher.
> >>
> >> There are very few changes aside from devicetree patches, most of
> >> which are for the i.MX, Tegra, Qualcomm, Apple, K3 and Aspeed
> >> platforms.
> >>
> >> We have a couple of new SoCs in existing families:
> >>
> >> - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1
> >> - Qualcomm Snapdragon SDX65
> >> - NXP i.MX8ULP
> >> - Texas Instruments j721s2
> >> - Renesas R-Car S4-8
> >>
> >> The time between product announcement and kernel support is fairly short
> >> for all of these, which is nice. In particular the two Snapdragons
> >> were only
> >> announced this month and are the current high end of Qualcomm's products.
> >> On the other end of the spectrum, we also add support for ST SPEAr320s,
> >> which was launched 10 years ago.
> >>
> >> Aside from the Arm chips, there is also a pull request for a new
> >> RISC-V SoC,
> >> the Starfive JH7100, including some of the basic drivers to make it boot.
> >
> > There seems to half of the submitted Broadcom SoCs pull request missing
> > in this one, was there issues with those below:
> >
> > defconfigs:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/
> >
> >
> > drivers:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/[email protected]/
> >
> >
> > Should I resend or fix something in those? Thanks!
>
>
> Arnd, Olof, do I need to resend the 3 pull requests mentioned above?
> Thanks and happy new year.

I'm about to make a pass of merges, likely tomorrow -- I had to get my
Honeycomb working again since it hosts all the trees and mailboxes for
me.

No need to resend at this time.


-Olof