Il 07/03/23 14:17, Alexandre Mergnat ha scritto:
> From: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <[email protected]>
>
> MT8365 has a SYST timer (System Timer), therefore the compatible node
> should be "mediatek,mt6765-timer" instead of "mediatek,mt6795-systimer"
> (which corresponds to ARM/ARM64 System Timer).
So this is not a CPUXGPT, not a GPT, but a SYST?
At this point, this should not be even introduced because commit [1] is
not in linux-next yet.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Matthias, please take note...
Regards,
Angelo
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 2:32 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Il 07/03/23 14:17, Alexandre Mergnat ha scritto:
> > From: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <[email protected]>
> >
> > MT8365 has a SYST timer (System Timer), therefore the compatible node
> > should be "mediatek,mt6765-timer" instead of "mediatek,mt6795-systimer"
> > (which corresponds to ARM/ARM64 System Timer).
>
> So this is not a CPUXGPT, not a GPT, but a SYST?
>
> At this point, this should not be even introduced because commit [1] is
> not in linux-next yet.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
I've posted a new revision of this patchset containing the systimer fix.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/[email protected]/
ttyl
bero