Hello Luiz,
Thank you for the information. It is good to know that this tool is
actively used and that there is a way to skip existing flaky tests.
Just for clarification, is this a requirement to land the kernel
changes, i.e. should I prioritize adding these tests immediately to
move the process forward? Or can we land the changes based on the
testing I have already done and I'll work on these tests in parallel?
Thanks,
Daniel
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 5:04 PM Luiz Augusto von Dentz
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 3:25 PM Daniel Winkler <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Luiz,
> >
> > Thank you for the feedback regarding mgmt-tester. I intended to use
> > the tool, but found that it had a very high rate of test failure even
> > before I started adding new tests. If you have a strong preference for
> > its use, I can look into it again but it may take some time. These
> > changes were tested with manual and automated functional testing on
> > our end.
> >
> > Please let me know your thoughts.
>
> Total: 406, Passed: 358 (88.2%), Failed: 43, Not Run: 5
>
> Looks like there are some 43 tests failing, we will need to fix these
> but it should prevent us to add new ones as well, you can use -p to
> filter what tests to run if you want to avoid these for now.