> But I don't know if there is anything else than the profiling code
> that _really_ wants access to /proc/kallsyms in user space as a
> regular user.
Am unsure about this, but kprobes? (/jprobes/kretprobes), and by
extension, wrappers over this infra (like SystemTap)?
I (hazily) recollect a script I once wrote (years back though) that
collects kernel virtual addresses off of kallsyms for the purpose of
passing them to a 'helper' kernel module that uses kprobes. I realize
that 'modern' kprobes exposes APIs that just require the symbolic name
& that they're anyway at kernel privilege... but the point is, a
usermode script was picking up and passing the kernel addresses.
Also, what about kernel addresses exposed via System.map?
Oh, just checked, it's root rw only.. pl ignore.
> That said, that patch also fixes the /proc/kallsyms root check, in
> that now you can do:
>
> sudo head < /proc/kallsyms
>
> and it still shows all zeroes - because the file was *opened* as a
> normal user. That's how UNIX file access security works, and how it is
> fundamentally supposed to work (ie passing a file descriptor to a sui
> program doesn't magically make it gain privileges).
Indeed.
From 1583552546386907317@xxx Thu Nov 09 02:09:52 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583410491222242898
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread