Hey Russell,
I did give thought to our previous conversations and I will still do
fix mes but am going to be more careful
with I submit them. Furthermore it seems #define
NETX_GPIO_COUNTER_CTRL_GPIO_RE is not defined
correctly. As the maintainer what should I define it to?
Cheers Nick
On Tuesday 22 July 2014 00:16:26 Nick Krause wrote:
> Hey Russell,
> I did give thought to our previous conversations and I will still do
> fix mes but am going to be more careful
> with I submit them. Furthermore it seems #define
> NETX_GPIO_COUNTER_CTRL_GPIO_RE is not defined
> correctly. As the maintainer what should I define it to?
Are you offering to become the maintainer for netx?
Try to get hold of a reference manual for the chip. More importantly
than the fixme, I think we should be able to move this platform into
ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM. This means moving the contents of the header files
into the places where they are used, and finding a better home for the
pfifo driver.
Arnd
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2014 00:16:26 Nick Krause wrote:
>> Hey Russell,
>> I did give thought to our previous conversations and I will still do
>> fix mes but am going to be more careful
>> with I submit them. Furthermore it seems #define
>> NETX_GPIO_COUNTER_CTRL_GPIO_RE is not defined
>> correctly. As the maintainer what should I define it to?
>
> Are you offering to become the maintainer for netx?
>
> Try to get hold of a reference manual for the chip. More importantly
> than the fixme, I think we should be able to move this platform into
> ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM. This means moving the contents of the header files
> into the places where they are used, and finding a better home for the
> pfifo driver.
>
> Arnd
Arnd,
I am not asking to me the maintainer of netx.
I was just trying to help out.
Cheers Nick