2020-12-01 01:37:34

by Badhri Jagan Sridharan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/3] usb: typec: tcpm: Introduce vsafe0v for vbus

TCPM at present lacks the notion of VSAFE0V. There
are three vbus threshold levels that are critical to track:
a. vSafe5V - VBUS “5 volts” as defined by the USB
PD specification.
b. vSinkDisconnect - Threshold used for transition from
Attached.SNK to Unattached.SNK.
c. vSafe0V - VBUS “0 volts” as defined by the USB
PD specification.

Tracking vSafe0V is crucial for entry into Try.SNK and
Attached.SRC and turning vbus back on by the source in
response to hard reset.

From "4.5.2.2.8.2 Exiting from AttachWait.SRC State" section
in the Type-C spec:

"The port shall transition to Attached.SRC when VBUS is at
vSafe0V and the SRC.Rd state is detected on exactly one of
the CC1 or CC2 pins for at least tCCDebounce."

"A DRP that strongly prefers the Sink role may optionally
transition to Try.SNK instead of Attached.SRC when VBUS
is at vSafe0V and the SRC.Rd state is detected on exactly
one of the CC1 or CC2 pins for at least tCCDebounce."

From "7.1.5 Response to Hard Resets" section in the PD spec:

"After establishing the vSafe0V voltage condition on VBUS,
the Source Shall wait tSrcRecover before re-applying VCONN
and restoring VBUS to vSafe5V."

vbus_present in the TCPM code tracks vSafe5V(vbus_present is true)
and vSinkDisconnect(vbus_present is false).

This change adds is_vbus_vsafe0v callback which when set makes
TCPM query for vSafe0V voltage level when needed.

Since not all TCPC controllers might have the capability
to report vSafe0V, TCPM assumes that vSafe0V is same as
vSinkDisconnect when is_vbus_vsafe0v callback is not set.
This allows TCPM to continue to support controllers which don't
have the support for reporting vSafe0V.

Introducing vSafe0V helps fix the failure reported at
"Step 15. CVS verifies PUT remains in AttachWait.SRC for 500ms"
of "TD 4.7.2 Try. SNK DRP Connect DRP Test" of
"Universal Serial Bus Type-C (USB Type-C) Functional Test
Specification Chapters 4 and 5". Here the compliance tester
intentionally maintains vbus at greater than vSafe0V and expects
the Product under test to stay in AttachWait.SRC till vbus drops
to vSafe0V.

Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <[email protected]>
---
drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
include/linux/usb/tcpm.h | 6 ++++
2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
index 3bbc1f10af49..10a065eef73e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
@@ -258,7 +258,19 @@ struct tcpm_port {
bool attached;
bool connected;
enum typec_port_type port_type;
+
+ /*
+ * Set to true when vbus is greater than VSAFE5V min.
+ * Set to false when vbus falls below vSinkDisconnect max threshold.
+ */
bool vbus_present;
+
+ /*
+ * Set to true when vbus is less than VSAFE0V max.
+ * Set to false when vbus is greater than VSAFE0V max.
+ */
+ bool vbus_vsafe0v;
+
bool vbus_never_low;
bool vbus_source;
bool vbus_charge;
@@ -3094,7 +3106,7 @@ static void run_state_machine(struct tcpm_port *port)
else if (tcpm_port_is_audio(port))
tcpm_set_state(port, AUDIO_ACC_ATTACHED,
PD_T_CC_DEBOUNCE);
- else if (tcpm_port_is_source(port))
+ else if (tcpm_port_is_source(port) && port->vbus_vsafe0v)
tcpm_set_state(port,
tcpm_try_snk(port) ? SNK_TRY
: SRC_ATTACHED,
@@ -4097,6 +4109,12 @@ static void _tcpm_pd_vbus_on(struct tcpm_port *port)
{
tcpm_log_force(port, "VBUS on");
port->vbus_present = true;
+ /*
+ * When vbus_present is true i.e. Voltage at VBUS is greater than VSAFE5V implicitly
+ * states that vbus is not at VSAFE0V, hence clear the vbus_vsafe0v flag here.
+ */
+ port->vbus_vsafe0v = false;
+
switch (port->state) {
case SNK_TRANSITION_SINK_VBUS:
port->explicit_contract = true;
@@ -4186,16 +4204,8 @@ static void _tcpm_pd_vbus_off(struct tcpm_port *port)
case SNK_HARD_RESET_SINK_OFF:
tcpm_set_state(port, SNK_HARD_RESET_WAIT_VBUS, 0);
break;
- case SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_OFF:
- /*
- * After establishing the vSafe0V voltage condition on VBUS, the Source Shall wait
- * tSrcRecover before re-applying VCONN and restoring VBUS to vSafe5V.
- */
- tcpm_set_state(port, SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_ON, PD_T_SRC_RECOVER);
- break;
case HARD_RESET_SEND:
break;
-
case SNK_TRY:
/* Do nothing, waiting for timeout */
break;
@@ -4266,6 +4276,28 @@ static void _tcpm_pd_vbus_off(struct tcpm_port *port)
}
}

+static void _tcpm_pd_vbus_vsafe0v(struct tcpm_port *port)
+{
+ tcpm_log_force(port, "VBUS VSAFE0V");
+ port->vbus_vsafe0v = true;
+ switch (port->state) {
+ case SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_OFF:
+ /*
+ * After establishing the vSafe0V voltage condition on VBUS, the Source Shall wait
+ * tSrcRecover before re-applying VCONN and restoring VBUS to vSafe5V.
+ */
+ tcpm_set_state(port, SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_ON, PD_T_SRC_RECOVER);
+ break;
+ case SRC_ATTACH_WAIT:
+ if (tcpm_port_is_source(port))
+ tcpm_set_state(port, tcpm_try_snk(port) ? SNK_TRY : SRC_ATTACHED,
+ PD_T_CC_DEBOUNCE);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
static void _tcpm_pd_hard_reset(struct tcpm_port *port)
{
tcpm_log_force(port, "Received hard reset");
@@ -4301,10 +4333,19 @@ static void tcpm_pd_event_handler(struct kthread_work *work)
bool vbus;

vbus = port->tcpc->get_vbus(port->tcpc);
- if (vbus)
+ if (vbus) {
_tcpm_pd_vbus_on(port);
- else
+ } else {
_tcpm_pd_vbus_off(port);
+ /*
+ * When TCPC does not support detecting vsafe0v voltage level,
+ * treat vbus absent as vsafe0v. Else invoke is_vbus_vsafe0v
+ * to see if vbus has discharge to VSAFE0V.
+ */
+ if (!port->tcpc->is_vbus_vsafe0v ||
+ port->tcpc->is_vbus_vsafe0v(port->tcpc) > 0)
+ _tcpm_pd_vbus_vsafe0v(port);
+ }
}
if (events & TCPM_CC_EVENT) {
enum typec_cc_status cc1, cc2;
diff --git a/include/linux/usb/tcpm.h b/include/linux/usb/tcpm.h
index e68aaa12886f..615d4532c028 100644
--- a/include/linux/usb/tcpm.h
+++ b/include/linux/usb/tcpm.h
@@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ enum tcpm_transmit_type {
* will be turned on. requested_vbus_voltage is set to 0 when vbus
* is going to disappear knowingly i.e. during PR_SWAP and
* HARD_RESET etc.
+ * @is_vbus_vsafe0v:
+ * Optional; TCPCI spec based TCPC implementations are expected to
+ * detect VSAFE0V voltage level at vbus. When detection of VSAFE0V
+ * is supported by TCPC, set this callback for TCPM to query
+ * whether vbus is at VSAFE0V when needed.
*/
struct tcpc_dev {
struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
@@ -128,6 +133,7 @@ struct tcpc_dev {
int (*enable_auto_vbus_discharge)(struct tcpc_dev *dev, bool enable);
int (*set_auto_vbus_discharge_threshold)(struct tcpc_dev *dev, enum typec_pwr_opmode mode,
bool pps_active, u32 requested_vbus_voltage);
+ int (*is_vbus_vsafe0v)(struct tcpc_dev *dev);
};

struct tcpm_port;
--
2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog


2020-12-01 01:37:44

by Badhri Jagan Sridharan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/3] usb: typec: tcpci: Add support to report vSafe0V

This change adds vbus_vsafe0v which when set, makes TCPM
query for VSAFE0V by assigning the tcpc.is_vbus_vsafe0v callback.
Also enables ALERT.ExtendedStatus which is triggered when
status of EXTENDED_STATUS.vSafe0V changes.
EXTENDED_STATUS.vSafe0V is set when vbus is at vSafe0V and
cleared otherwise.

Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <[email protected]>
---
drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.h | 6 ++++
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c
index 12d983a75510..e281b8bee4db 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c
@@ -402,6 +402,19 @@ static int tcpci_get_vbus(struct tcpc_dev *tcpc)
return !!(reg & TCPC_POWER_STATUS_VBUS_PRES);
}

+static int tcpci_is_vbus_vsafe0v(struct tcpc_dev *tcpc)
+{
+ struct tcpci *tcpci = tcpc_to_tcpci(tcpc);
+ unsigned int reg;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regmap_read(tcpci->regmap, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS, &reg);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ return !!(reg & TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V);
+}
+
static int tcpci_set_vbus(struct tcpc_dev *tcpc, bool source, bool sink)
{
struct tcpci *tcpci = tcpc_to_tcpci(tcpc);
@@ -554,12 +567,22 @@ static int tcpci_init(struct tcpc_dev *tcpc)
TCPC_ALERT_RX_HARD_RST | TCPC_ALERT_CC_STATUS;
if (tcpci->controls_vbus)
reg |= TCPC_ALERT_POWER_STATUS;
+ /* Enable VSAFE0V status interrupt when detecting VSAFE0V is supported */
+ if (tcpci->data->vbus_vsafe0v) {
+ reg |= TCPC_ALERT_EXTENDED_STATUS;
+ ret = regmap_write(tcpci->regmap, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_MASK,
+ TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
return tcpci_write16(tcpci, TCPC_ALERT_MASK, reg);
}

irqreturn_t tcpci_irq(struct tcpci *tcpci)
{
u16 status;
+ int ret;
+ unsigned int raw;

tcpci_read16(tcpci, TCPC_ALERT, &status);

@@ -575,18 +598,17 @@ irqreturn_t tcpci_irq(struct tcpci *tcpci)
tcpm_cc_change(tcpci->port);

if (status & TCPC_ALERT_POWER_STATUS) {
- unsigned int reg;
-
- regmap_read(tcpci->regmap, TCPC_POWER_STATUS_MASK, &reg);
-
- /*
- * If power status mask has been reset, then the TCPC
- * has reset.
- */
- if (reg == 0xff)
- tcpm_tcpc_reset(tcpci->port);
- else
- tcpm_vbus_change(tcpci->port);
+ ret = regmap_read(tcpci->regmap, TCPC_POWER_STATUS_MASK, &raw);
+ if (ret >= 0) {
+ /*
+ * If power status mask has been reset, then the TCPC
+ * has reset.
+ */
+ if (raw == 0xff)
+ tcpm_tcpc_reset(tcpci->port);
+ else
+ tcpm_vbus_change(tcpci->port);
+ }
}

if (status & TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS) {
@@ -622,6 +644,12 @@ irqreturn_t tcpci_irq(struct tcpci *tcpci)
tcpm_pd_receive(tcpci->port, &msg);
}

+ if (status & TCPC_ALERT_EXTENDED_STATUS) {
+ ret = regmap_read(tcpci->regmap, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS, &raw);
+ if (ret >= 0 && (raw & TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V))
+ tcpm_vbus_change(tcpci->port);
+ }
+
if (status & TCPC_ALERT_RX_HARD_RST)
tcpm_pd_hard_reset(tcpci->port);

@@ -699,6 +727,9 @@ struct tcpci *tcpci_register_port(struct device *dev, struct tcpci_data *data)
tcpci_set_auto_vbus_discharge_threshold;
}

+ if (tcpci->data->vbus_vsafe0v)
+ tcpci->tcpc.is_vbus_vsafe0v = tcpci_is_vbus_vsafe0v;
+
err = tcpci_parse_config(tcpci);
if (err < 0)
return ERR_PTR(err);
diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.h b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.h
index 3fe313655f0c..116a69c85e38 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.h
@@ -49,6 +49,9 @@
#define TCPC_TCPC_CTRL_ORIENTATION BIT(0)
#define TCPC_TCPC_CTRL_BIST_TM BIT(1)

+#define TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS 0x20
+#define TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V BIT(0)
+
#define TCPC_ROLE_CTRL 0x1a
#define TCPC_ROLE_CTRL_DRP BIT(6)
#define TCPC_ROLE_CTRL_RP_VAL_SHIFT 4
@@ -155,11 +158,14 @@ struct tcpci;
* is sourcing vbus.
* @auto_discharge_disconnect:
* Optional; Enables TCPC to autonously discharge vbus on disconnect.
+ * @vbus_vsafe0v:
+ * optional; Set when TCPC can detect whether vbus is at VSAFE0V.
*/
struct tcpci_data {
struct regmap *regmap;
unsigned char TX_BUF_BYTE_x_hidden:1;
unsigned char auto_discharge_disconnect:1;
+ unsigned char vbus_vsafe0v:1;

int (*init)(struct tcpci *tcpci, struct tcpci_data *data);
int (*set_vconn)(struct tcpci *tcpci, struct tcpci_data *data,
--
2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog

2020-12-01 02:44:07

by Badhri Jagan Sridharan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] usb: typec: tcpci_maxim: Enable VSAFE0V signalling

Unmask EXTENDED_STATUS_MASK.vSafe0V, ALERT.Extended_Status
and set vbus_vsafe0v to enable VSAFE0V signalling.

Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <[email protected]>
---
drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c
index c1797239bf08..1aabe6abd819 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c
@@ -112,11 +112,18 @@ static void max_tcpci_init_regs(struct max_tcpci_chip *chip)
return;
}

+ /* Enable VSAFE0V detection */
+ ret = max_tcpci_write8(chip, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_MASK, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(chip->dev, "Unable to unmask TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V ret:%d\n", ret);
+ return;
+ }
+
alert_mask = TCPC_ALERT_TX_SUCCESS | TCPC_ALERT_TX_DISCARDED | TCPC_ALERT_TX_FAILED |
TCPC_ALERT_RX_HARD_RST | TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS | TCPC_ALERT_CC_STATUS |
TCPC_ALERT_VBUS_DISCNCT | TCPC_ALERT_RX_BUF_OVF | TCPC_ALERT_POWER_STATUS |
/* Enable Extended alert for detecting Fast Role Swap Signal */
- TCPC_ALERT_EXTND;
+ TCPC_ALERT_EXTND | TCPC_ALERT_EXTENDED_STATUS;

ret = max_tcpci_write16(chip, TCPC_ALERT_MASK, alert_mask);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -315,6 +322,12 @@ static irqreturn_t _max_tcpci_irq(struct max_tcpci_chip *chip, u16 status)
}
}

+ if (status & TCPC_ALERT_EXTENDED_STATUS) {
+ ret = max_tcpci_read8(chip, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS, (u8 *)&reg_status);
+ if (ret >= 0 && (reg_status & TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V))
+ tcpm_vbus_change(chip->port);
+ }
+
if (status & TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS)
process_rx(chip, status);

@@ -442,6 +455,7 @@ static int max_tcpci_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id
chip->data.init = tcpci_init;
chip->data.frs_sourcing_vbus = max_tcpci_frs_sourcing_vbus;
chip->data.auto_discharge_disconnect = true;
+ chip->data.vbus_vsafe0v = 1;

max_tcpci_init_regs(chip);
chip->tcpci = tcpci_register_port(chip->dev, &chip->data);
--
2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog

2020-12-01 13:20:56

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] usb: typec: tcpci_maxim: Enable VSAFE0V signalling

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:32:46PM -0800, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> Unmask EXTENDED_STATUS_MASK.vSafe0V, ALERT.Extended_Status
> and set vbus_vsafe0v to enable VSAFE0V signalling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c
> index c1797239bf08..1aabe6abd819 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c
> @@ -112,11 +112,18 @@ static void max_tcpci_init_regs(struct max_tcpci_chip *chip)
> return;
> }
>
> + /* Enable VSAFE0V detection */
> + ret = max_tcpci_write8(chip, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_MASK, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "Unable to unmask TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V ret:%d\n", ret);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> alert_mask = TCPC_ALERT_TX_SUCCESS | TCPC_ALERT_TX_DISCARDED | TCPC_ALERT_TX_FAILED |
> TCPC_ALERT_RX_HARD_RST | TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS | TCPC_ALERT_CC_STATUS |
> TCPC_ALERT_VBUS_DISCNCT | TCPC_ALERT_RX_BUF_OVF | TCPC_ALERT_POWER_STATUS |
> /* Enable Extended alert for detecting Fast Role Swap Signal */
> - TCPC_ALERT_EXTND;
> + TCPC_ALERT_EXTND | TCPC_ALERT_EXTENDED_STATUS;
>
> ret = max_tcpci_write16(chip, TCPC_ALERT_MASK, alert_mask);
> if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -315,6 +322,12 @@ static irqreturn_t _max_tcpci_irq(struct max_tcpci_chip *chip, u16 status)
> }
> }
>
> + if (status & TCPC_ALERT_EXTENDED_STATUS) {
> + ret = max_tcpci_read8(chip, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS, (u8 *)&reg_status);
> + if (ret >= 0 && (reg_status & TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V))
> + tcpm_vbus_change(chip->port);
> + }
> +
> if (status & TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS)
> process_rx(chip, status);
>
> @@ -442,6 +455,7 @@ static int max_tcpci_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id
> chip->data.init = tcpci_init;
> chip->data.frs_sourcing_vbus = max_tcpci_frs_sourcing_vbus;
> chip->data.auto_discharge_disconnect = true;
> + chip->data.vbus_vsafe0v = 1;

Why not use true/false ?

>
> max_tcpci_init_regs(chip);
> chip->tcpci = tcpci_register_port(chip->dev, &chip->data);
> --
> 2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog
>

2020-12-01 22:35:34

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] usb: typec: tcpm: Introduce vsafe0v for vbus

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:32:44PM -0800, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> TCPM at present lacks the notion of VSAFE0V. There
> are three vbus threshold levels that are critical to track:
> a. vSafe5V - VBUS “5 volts” as defined by the USB
> PD specification.
> b. vSinkDisconnect - Threshold used for transition from
> Attached.SNK to Unattached.SNK.
> c. vSafe0V - VBUS “0 volts” as defined by the USB
> PD specification.
>
> Tracking vSafe0V is crucial for entry into Try.SNK and
> Attached.SRC and turning vbus back on by the source in
> response to hard reset.
>
> From "4.5.2.2.8.2 Exiting from AttachWait.SRC State" section
> in the Type-C spec:
>
> "The port shall transition to Attached.SRC when VBUS is at
> vSafe0V and the SRC.Rd state is detected on exactly one of
> the CC1 or CC2 pins for at least tCCDebounce."
>
> "A DRP that strongly prefers the Sink role may optionally
> transition to Try.SNK instead of Attached.SRC when VBUS
> is at vSafe0V and the SRC.Rd state is detected on exactly
> one of the CC1 or CC2 pins for at least tCCDebounce."
>
> From "7.1.5 Response to Hard Resets" section in the PD spec:
>
> "After establishing the vSafe0V voltage condition on VBUS,
> the Source Shall wait tSrcRecover before re-applying VCONN
> and restoring VBUS to vSafe5V."
>
> vbus_present in the TCPM code tracks vSafe5V(vbus_present is true)
> and vSinkDisconnect(vbus_present is false).
>
> This change adds is_vbus_vsafe0v callback which when set makes
> TCPM query for vSafe0V voltage level when needed.
>
> Since not all TCPC controllers might have the capability
> to report vSafe0V, TCPM assumes that vSafe0V is same as
> vSinkDisconnect when is_vbus_vsafe0v callback is not set.
> This allows TCPM to continue to support controllers which don't
> have the support for reporting vSafe0V.
>
> Introducing vSafe0V helps fix the failure reported at
> "Step 15. CVS verifies PUT remains in AttachWait.SRC for 500ms"
> of "TD 4.7.2 Try. SNK DRP Connect DRP Test" of
> "Universal Serial Bus Type-C (USB Type-C) Functional Test
> Specification Chapters 4 and 5". Here the compliance tester
> intentionally maintains vbus at greater than vSafe0V and expects
> the Product under test to stay in AttachWait.SRC till vbus drops
> to vSafe0V.
>
> Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> include/linux/usb/tcpm.h | 6 ++++
> 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> index 3bbc1f10af49..10a065eef73e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> @@ -258,7 +258,19 @@ struct tcpm_port {
> bool attached;
> bool connected;
> enum typec_port_type port_type;
> +
> + /*
> + * Set to true when vbus is greater than VSAFE5V min.
> + * Set to false when vbus falls below vSinkDisconnect max threshold.
> + */
> bool vbus_present;
> +
> + /*
> + * Set to true when vbus is less than VSAFE0V max.
> + * Set to false when vbus is greater than VSAFE0V max.
> + */
> + bool vbus_vsafe0v;
> +
> bool vbus_never_low;
> bool vbus_source;
> bool vbus_charge;
> @@ -3094,7 +3106,7 @@ static void run_state_machine(struct tcpm_port *port)
> else if (tcpm_port_is_audio(port))
> tcpm_set_state(port, AUDIO_ACC_ATTACHED,
> PD_T_CC_DEBOUNCE);
> - else if (tcpm_port_is_source(port))
> + else if (tcpm_port_is_source(port) && port->vbus_vsafe0v)
> tcpm_set_state(port,
> tcpm_try_snk(port) ? SNK_TRY
> : SRC_ATTACHED,
> @@ -4097,6 +4109,12 @@ static void _tcpm_pd_vbus_on(struct tcpm_port *port)
> {
> tcpm_log_force(port, "VBUS on");
> port->vbus_present = true;
> + /*
> + * When vbus_present is true i.e. Voltage at VBUS is greater than VSAFE5V implicitly
> + * states that vbus is not at VSAFE0V, hence clear the vbus_vsafe0v flag here.
> + */
> + port->vbus_vsafe0v = false;
> +
> switch (port->state) {
> case SNK_TRANSITION_SINK_VBUS:
> port->explicit_contract = true;
> @@ -4186,16 +4204,8 @@ static void _tcpm_pd_vbus_off(struct tcpm_port *port)
> case SNK_HARD_RESET_SINK_OFF:
> tcpm_set_state(port, SNK_HARD_RESET_WAIT_VBUS, 0);
> break;
> - case SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_OFF:
> - /*
> - * After establishing the vSafe0V voltage condition on VBUS, the Source Shall wait
> - * tSrcRecover before re-applying VCONN and restoring VBUS to vSafe5V.
> - */
> - tcpm_set_state(port, SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_ON, PD_T_SRC_RECOVER);
> - break;
> case HARD_RESET_SEND:
> break;
> -
> case SNK_TRY:
> /* Do nothing, waiting for timeout */
> break;
> @@ -4266,6 +4276,28 @@ static void _tcpm_pd_vbus_off(struct tcpm_port *port)
> }
> }
>
> +static void _tcpm_pd_vbus_vsafe0v(struct tcpm_port *port)
> +{
> + tcpm_log_force(port, "VBUS VSAFE0V");
> + port->vbus_vsafe0v = true;
> + switch (port->state) {
> + case SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_OFF:
> + /*
> + * After establishing the vSafe0V voltage condition on VBUS, the Source Shall wait
> + * tSrcRecover before re-applying VCONN and restoring VBUS to vSafe5V.
> + */
> + tcpm_set_state(port, SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_ON, PD_T_SRC_RECOVER);
> + break;
> + case SRC_ATTACH_WAIT:
> + if (tcpm_port_is_source(port))
> + tcpm_set_state(port, tcpm_try_snk(port) ? SNK_TRY : SRC_ATTACHED,
> + PD_T_CC_DEBOUNCE);
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void _tcpm_pd_hard_reset(struct tcpm_port *port)
> {
> tcpm_log_force(port, "Received hard reset");
> @@ -4301,10 +4333,19 @@ static void tcpm_pd_event_handler(struct kthread_work *work)
> bool vbus;
>
> vbus = port->tcpc->get_vbus(port->tcpc);
> - if (vbus)
> + if (vbus) {
> _tcpm_pd_vbus_on(port);
> - else
> + } else {
> _tcpm_pd_vbus_off(port);
> + /*
> + * When TCPC does not support detecting vsafe0v voltage level,
> + * treat vbus absent as vsafe0v. Else invoke is_vbus_vsafe0v
> + * to see if vbus has discharge to VSAFE0V.
> + */
> + if (!port->tcpc->is_vbus_vsafe0v ||
> + port->tcpc->is_vbus_vsafe0v(port->tcpc) > 0)
> + _tcpm_pd_vbus_vsafe0v(port);
> + }
> }
> if (events & TCPM_CC_EVENT) {
> enum typec_cc_status cc1, cc2;
> diff --git a/include/linux/usb/tcpm.h b/include/linux/usb/tcpm.h
> index e68aaa12886f..615d4532c028 100644
> --- a/include/linux/usb/tcpm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/usb/tcpm.h
> @@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ enum tcpm_transmit_type {
> * will be turned on. requested_vbus_voltage is set to 0 when vbus
> * is going to disappear knowingly i.e. during PR_SWAP and
> * HARD_RESET etc.
> + * @is_vbus_vsafe0v:
> + * Optional; TCPCI spec based TCPC implementations are expected to
> + * detect VSAFE0V voltage level at vbus. When detection of VSAFE0V
> + * is supported by TCPC, set this callback for TCPM to query
> + * whether vbus is at VSAFE0V when needed.

Return values ?

> */
> struct tcpc_dev {
> struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> @@ -128,6 +133,7 @@ struct tcpc_dev {
> int (*enable_auto_vbus_discharge)(struct tcpc_dev *dev, bool enable);
> int (*set_auto_vbus_discharge_threshold)(struct tcpc_dev *dev, enum typec_pwr_opmode mode,
> bool pps_active, u32 requested_vbus_voltage);
> + int (*is_vbus_vsafe0v)(struct tcpc_dev *dev);

I don't really see the point of returning an int here. If an error is
returned, it should be checked. However, that is not currently the case;
an error is treated as "false" return. As such, the function may as well
return true/false (and false if an error is observed).

> };
>
> struct tcpm_port;
> --
> 2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog
>

2020-12-02 03:37:19

by Badhri Jagan Sridharan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] usb: typec: tcpci: Add support to report vSafe0V

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 5:27 AM Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:32:45PM -0800, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> > This change adds vbus_vsafe0v which when set, makes TCPM
> > query for VSAFE0V by assigning the tcpc.is_vbus_vsafe0v callback.
> > Also enables ALERT.ExtendedStatus which is triggered when
> > status of EXTENDED_STATUS.vSafe0V changes.
> > EXTENDED_STATUS.vSafe0V is set when vbus is at vSafe0V and
> > cleared otherwise.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.h | 6 ++++
> > 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c
> > index 12d983a75510..e281b8bee4db 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.c
> > @@ -402,6 +402,19 @@ static int tcpci_get_vbus(struct tcpc_dev *tcpc)
> > return !!(reg & TCPC_POWER_STATUS_VBUS_PRES);
> > }
> >
> > +static int tcpci_is_vbus_vsafe0v(struct tcpc_dev *tcpc)
> > +{
> > + struct tcpci *tcpci = tcpc_to_tcpci(tcpc);
> > + unsigned int reg;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_read(tcpci->regmap, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS, &reg);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return !!(reg & TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int tcpci_set_vbus(struct tcpc_dev *tcpc, bool source, bool sink)
> > {
> > struct tcpci *tcpci = tcpc_to_tcpci(tcpc);
> > @@ -554,12 +567,22 @@ static int tcpci_init(struct tcpc_dev *tcpc)
> > TCPC_ALERT_RX_HARD_RST | TCPC_ALERT_CC_STATUS;
> > if (tcpci->controls_vbus)
> > reg |= TCPC_ALERT_POWER_STATUS;
> > + /* Enable VSAFE0V status interrupt when detecting VSAFE0V is supported */
> > + if (tcpci->data->vbus_vsafe0v) {
> > + reg |= TCPC_ALERT_EXTENDED_STATUS;
> > + ret = regmap_write(tcpci->regmap, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_MASK,
> > + TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > return tcpci_write16(tcpci, TCPC_ALERT_MASK, reg);
> > }
> >
> > irqreturn_t tcpci_irq(struct tcpci *tcpci)
> > {
> > u16 status;
> > + int ret;
> > + unsigned int raw;
> >
> > tcpci_read16(tcpci, TCPC_ALERT, &status);
> >
> > @@ -575,18 +598,17 @@ irqreturn_t tcpci_irq(struct tcpci *tcpci)
> > tcpm_cc_change(tcpci->port);
> >
> > if (status & TCPC_ALERT_POWER_STATUS) {
> > - unsigned int reg;
> > -
> > - regmap_read(tcpci->regmap, TCPC_POWER_STATUS_MASK, &reg);
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * If power status mask has been reset, then the TCPC
> > - * has reset.
> > - */
> > - if (reg == 0xff)
> > - tcpm_tcpc_reset(tcpci->port);
> > - else
> > - tcpm_vbus_change(tcpci->port);
> > + ret = regmap_read(tcpci->regmap, TCPC_POWER_STATUS_MASK, &raw);
> > + if (ret >= 0) {
> > + /*
> > + * If power status mask has been reset, then the TCPC
> > + * has reset.
> > + */
> > + if (raw == 0xff)
> > + tcpm_tcpc_reset(tcpci->port);
> > + else
> > + tcpm_vbus_change(tcpci->port);
> > + }
>
> This change seems unrelated to this patch. Besides that, are you sure that
> ignoring an error from regmap_read() is sensible here ?

Sorry should have split that into a separate patch. I was actually intending
to do the following where tcpm calls are not made if TCPC_POWER_STATUS_MASK
read returns error. The code was previously ignoring the error.

if (!ret) {
/*
* If power status mask has been reset, then the TCPC
* has reset.
*/
if (raw == 0xff)
tcpm_tcpc_reset(tcpci->port);
else
tcpm_vbus_change(tcpci->port);
}

This is reasonable right ?

}

>
> Overall, it may make sense to improve error handling in this driver, but I think
> it should be done in a separate patch.
>
> > }
> >
> > if (status & TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS) {
> > @@ -622,6 +644,12 @@ irqreturn_t tcpci_irq(struct tcpci *tcpci)
> > tcpm_pd_receive(tcpci->port, &msg);
> > }
> >
> > + if (status & TCPC_ALERT_EXTENDED_STATUS) {
> > + ret = regmap_read(tcpci->regmap, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS, &raw);
> > + if (ret >= 0 && (raw & TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V))
> > + tcpm_vbus_change(tcpci->port);
> > + }
> > +
> > if (status & TCPC_ALERT_RX_HARD_RST)
> > tcpm_pd_hard_reset(tcpci->port);
> >
> > @@ -699,6 +727,9 @@ struct tcpci *tcpci_register_port(struct device *dev, struct tcpci_data *data)
> > tcpci_set_auto_vbus_discharge_threshold;
> > }
> >
> > + if (tcpci->data->vbus_vsafe0v)
> > + tcpci->tcpc.is_vbus_vsafe0v = tcpci_is_vbus_vsafe0v;
> > +
> > err = tcpci_parse_config(tcpci);
> > if (err < 0)
> > return ERR_PTR(err);
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.h b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.h
> > index 3fe313655f0c..116a69c85e38 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.h
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci.h
> > @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@
> > #define TCPC_TCPC_CTRL_ORIENTATION BIT(0)
> > #define TCPC_TCPC_CTRL_BIST_TM BIT(1)
> >
> > +#define TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS 0x20
> > +#define TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V BIT(0)
> > +
> > #define TCPC_ROLE_CTRL 0x1a
> > #define TCPC_ROLE_CTRL_DRP BIT(6)
> > #define TCPC_ROLE_CTRL_RP_VAL_SHIFT 4
> > @@ -155,11 +158,14 @@ struct tcpci;
> > * is sourcing vbus.
> > * @auto_discharge_disconnect:
> > * Optional; Enables TCPC to autonously discharge vbus on disconnect.
> > + * @vbus_vsafe0v:
> > + * optional; Set when TCPC can detect whether vbus is at VSAFE0V.
> > */
> > struct tcpci_data {
> > struct regmap *regmap;
> > unsigned char TX_BUF_BYTE_x_hidden:1;
> > unsigned char auto_discharge_disconnect:1;
> > + unsigned char vbus_vsafe0v:1;
> >
> > int (*init)(struct tcpci *tcpci, struct tcpci_data *data);
> > int (*set_vconn)(struct tcpci *tcpci, struct tcpci_data *data,
> > --
> > 2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog
> >

2020-12-02 04:14:09

by Badhri Jagan Sridharan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] usb: typec: tcpm: Introduce vsafe0v for vbus

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 5:15 AM Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:32:44PM -0800, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> > TCPM at present lacks the notion of VSAFE0V. There
> > are three vbus threshold levels that are critical to track:
> > a. vSafe5V - VBUS “5 volts” as defined by the USB
> > PD specification.
> > b. vSinkDisconnect - Threshold used for transition from
> > Attached.SNK to Unattached.SNK.
> > c. vSafe0V - VBUS “0 volts” as defined by the USB
> > PD specification.
> >
> > Tracking vSafe0V is crucial for entry into Try.SNK and
> > Attached.SRC and turning vbus back on by the source in
> > response to hard reset.
> >
> > From "4.5.2.2.8.2 Exiting from AttachWait.SRC State" section
> > in the Type-C spec:
> >
> > "The port shall transition to Attached.SRC when VBUS is at
> > vSafe0V and the SRC.Rd state is detected on exactly one of
> > the CC1 or CC2 pins for at least tCCDebounce."
> >
> > "A DRP that strongly prefers the Sink role may optionally
> > transition to Try.SNK instead of Attached.SRC when VBUS
> > is at vSafe0V and the SRC.Rd state is detected on exactly
> > one of the CC1 or CC2 pins for at least tCCDebounce."
> >
> > From "7.1.5 Response to Hard Resets" section in the PD spec:
> >
> > "After establishing the vSafe0V voltage condition on VBUS,
> > the Source Shall wait tSrcRecover before re-applying VCONN
> > and restoring VBUS to vSafe5V."
> >
> > vbus_present in the TCPM code tracks vSafe5V(vbus_present is true)
> > and vSinkDisconnect(vbus_present is false).
> >
> > This change adds is_vbus_vsafe0v callback which when set makes
> > TCPM query for vSafe0V voltage level when needed.
> >
> > Since not all TCPC controllers might have the capability
> > to report vSafe0V, TCPM assumes that vSafe0V is same as
> > vSinkDisconnect when is_vbus_vsafe0v callback is not set.
> > This allows TCPM to continue to support controllers which don't
> > have the support for reporting vSafe0V.
> >
> > Introducing vSafe0V helps fix the failure reported at
> > "Step 15. CVS verifies PUT remains in AttachWait.SRC for 500ms"
> > of "TD 4.7.2 Try. SNK DRP Connect DRP Test" of
> > "Universal Serial Bus Type-C (USB Type-C) Functional Test
> > Specification Chapters 4 and 5". Here the compliance tester
> > intentionally maintains vbus at greater than vSafe0V and expects
> > the Product under test to stay in AttachWait.SRC till vbus drops
> > to vSafe0V.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > include/linux/usb/tcpm.h | 6 ++++
> > 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > index 3bbc1f10af49..10a065eef73e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > @@ -258,7 +258,19 @@ struct tcpm_port {
> > bool attached;
> > bool connected;
> > enum typec_port_type port_type;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Set to true when vbus is greater than VSAFE5V min.
> > + * Set to false when vbus falls below vSinkDisconnect max threshold.
> > + */
> > bool vbus_present;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Set to true when vbus is less than VSAFE0V max.
> > + * Set to false when vbus is greater than VSAFE0V max.
> > + */
> > + bool vbus_vsafe0v;
> > +
> > bool vbus_never_low;
> > bool vbus_source;
> > bool vbus_charge;
> > @@ -3094,7 +3106,7 @@ static void run_state_machine(struct tcpm_port *port)
> > else if (tcpm_port_is_audio(port))
> > tcpm_set_state(port, AUDIO_ACC_ATTACHED,
> > PD_T_CC_DEBOUNCE);
> > - else if (tcpm_port_is_source(port))
> > + else if (tcpm_port_is_source(port) && port->vbus_vsafe0v)
> > tcpm_set_state(port,
> > tcpm_try_snk(port) ? SNK_TRY
> > : SRC_ATTACHED,
> > @@ -4097,6 +4109,12 @@ static void _tcpm_pd_vbus_on(struct tcpm_port *port)
> > {
> > tcpm_log_force(port, "VBUS on");
> > port->vbus_present = true;
> > + /*
> > + * When vbus_present is true i.e. Voltage at VBUS is greater than VSAFE5V implicitly
> > + * states that vbus is not at VSAFE0V, hence clear the vbus_vsafe0v flag here.
> > + */
> > + port->vbus_vsafe0v = false;
> > +
> > switch (port->state) {
> > case SNK_TRANSITION_SINK_VBUS:
> > port->explicit_contract = true;
> > @@ -4186,16 +4204,8 @@ static void _tcpm_pd_vbus_off(struct tcpm_port *port)
> > case SNK_HARD_RESET_SINK_OFF:
> > tcpm_set_state(port, SNK_HARD_RESET_WAIT_VBUS, 0);
> > break;
> > - case SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_OFF:
> > - /*
> > - * After establishing the vSafe0V voltage condition on VBUS, the Source Shall wait
> > - * tSrcRecover before re-applying VCONN and restoring VBUS to vSafe5V.
> > - */
> > - tcpm_set_state(port, SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_ON, PD_T_SRC_RECOVER);
> > - break;
> > case HARD_RESET_SEND:
> > break;
> > -
> > case SNK_TRY:
> > /* Do nothing, waiting for timeout */
> > break;
> > @@ -4266,6 +4276,28 @@ static void _tcpm_pd_vbus_off(struct tcpm_port *port)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static void _tcpm_pd_vbus_vsafe0v(struct tcpm_port *port)
> > +{
> > + tcpm_log_force(port, "VBUS VSAFE0V");
> > + port->vbus_vsafe0v = true;
> > + switch (port->state) {
> > + case SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_OFF:
> > + /*
> > + * After establishing the vSafe0V voltage condition on VBUS, the Source Shall wait
> > + * tSrcRecover before re-applying VCONN and restoring VBUS to vSafe5V.
> > + */
> > + tcpm_set_state(port, SRC_HARD_RESET_VBUS_ON, PD_T_SRC_RECOVER);
> > + break;
> > + case SRC_ATTACH_WAIT:
> > + if (tcpm_port_is_source(port))
> > + tcpm_set_state(port, tcpm_try_snk(port) ? SNK_TRY : SRC_ATTACHED,
> > + PD_T_CC_DEBOUNCE);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static void _tcpm_pd_hard_reset(struct tcpm_port *port)
> > {
> > tcpm_log_force(port, "Received hard reset");
> > @@ -4301,10 +4333,19 @@ static void tcpm_pd_event_handler(struct kthread_work *work)
> > bool vbus;
> >
> > vbus = port->tcpc->get_vbus(port->tcpc);
> > - if (vbus)
> > + if (vbus) {
> > _tcpm_pd_vbus_on(port);
> > - else
> > + } else {
> > _tcpm_pd_vbus_off(port);
> > + /*
> > + * When TCPC does not support detecting vsafe0v voltage level,
> > + * treat vbus absent as vsafe0v. Else invoke is_vbus_vsafe0v
> > + * to see if vbus has discharge to VSAFE0V.
> > + */
> > + if (!port->tcpc->is_vbus_vsafe0v ||
> > + port->tcpc->is_vbus_vsafe0v(port->tcpc) > 0)
> > + _tcpm_pd_vbus_vsafe0v(port);
> > + }
> > }
> > if (events & TCPM_CC_EVENT) {
> > enum typec_cc_status cc1, cc2;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/usb/tcpm.h b/include/linux/usb/tcpm.h
> > index e68aaa12886f..615d4532c028 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/usb/tcpm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/usb/tcpm.h
> > @@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ enum tcpm_transmit_type {
> > * will be turned on. requested_vbus_voltage is set to 0 when vbus
> > * is going to disappear knowingly i.e. during PR_SWAP and
> > * HARD_RESET etc.
> > + * @is_vbus_vsafe0v:
> > + * Optional; TCPCI spec based TCPC implementations are expected to
> > + * detect VSAFE0V voltage level at vbus. When detection of VSAFE0V
> > + * is supported by TCPC, set this callback for TCPM to query
> > + * whether vbus is at VSAFE0V when needed.
>
> Return values ?

Fixing in v2.

>
> > */
> > struct tcpc_dev {
> > struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> > @@ -128,6 +133,7 @@ struct tcpc_dev {
> > int (*enable_auto_vbus_discharge)(struct tcpc_dev *dev, bool enable);
> > int (*set_auto_vbus_discharge_threshold)(struct tcpc_dev *dev, enum typec_pwr_opmode mode,
> > bool pps_active, u32 requested_vbus_voltage);
> > + int (*is_vbus_vsafe0v)(struct tcpc_dev *dev);
>
> I don't really see the point of returning an int here. If an error is
> returned, it should be checked. However, that is not currently the case;
> an error is treated as "false" return. As such, the function may as well
> return true/false (and false if an error is observed).

Sure. Changing the callback return to boolean in v2.

>
> > };
> >
> > struct tcpm_port;
> > --
> > 2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog
> >

2020-12-02 04:16:26

by Badhri Jagan Sridharan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] usb: typec: tcpci_maxim: Enable VSAFE0V signalling

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 5:16 AM Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 05:32:46PM -0800, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
> > Unmask EXTENDED_STATUS_MASK.vSafe0V, ALERT.Extended_Status
> > and set vbus_vsafe0v to enable VSAFE0V signalling.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c
> > index c1797239bf08..1aabe6abd819 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim.c
> > @@ -112,11 +112,18 @@ static void max_tcpci_init_regs(struct max_tcpci_chip *chip)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > + /* Enable VSAFE0V detection */
> > + ret = max_tcpci_write8(chip, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_MASK, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(chip->dev, "Unable to unmask TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V ret:%d\n", ret);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > alert_mask = TCPC_ALERT_TX_SUCCESS | TCPC_ALERT_TX_DISCARDED | TCPC_ALERT_TX_FAILED |
> > TCPC_ALERT_RX_HARD_RST | TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS | TCPC_ALERT_CC_STATUS |
> > TCPC_ALERT_VBUS_DISCNCT | TCPC_ALERT_RX_BUF_OVF | TCPC_ALERT_POWER_STATUS |
> > /* Enable Extended alert for detecting Fast Role Swap Signal */
> > - TCPC_ALERT_EXTND;
> > + TCPC_ALERT_EXTND | TCPC_ALERT_EXTENDED_STATUS;
> >
> > ret = max_tcpci_write16(chip, TCPC_ALERT_MASK, alert_mask);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > @@ -315,6 +322,12 @@ static irqreturn_t _max_tcpci_irq(struct max_tcpci_chip *chip, u16 status)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + if (status & TCPC_ALERT_EXTENDED_STATUS) {
> > + ret = max_tcpci_read8(chip, TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS, (u8 *)&reg_status);
> > + if (ret >= 0 && (reg_status & TCPC_EXTENDED_STATUS_VSAFE0V))
> > + tcpm_vbus_change(chip->port);
> > + }
> > +
> > if (status & TCPC_ALERT_RX_STATUS)
> > process_rx(chip, status);
> >
> > @@ -442,6 +455,7 @@ static int max_tcpci_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id
> > chip->data.init = tcpci_init;
> > chip->data.frs_sourcing_vbus = max_tcpci_frs_sourcing_vbus;
> > chip->data.auto_discharge_disconnect = true;
> > + chip->data.vbus_vsafe0v = 1;
>
> Why not use true/false ?

Sure. Fixing in v2.

>
> >
> > max_tcpci_init_regs(chip);
> > chip->tcpci = tcpci_register_port(chip->dev, &chip->data);
> > --
> > 2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog
> >