Hi Vignesh,
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 12:19, Vignesh Raman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Expected driver for mt8173 is "mediatek" and for mt8183
> it is "panfrost". Set IGT_FORCE_DRIVER to 'mediatek' as
> the expected driver for mt8173.
Actually, for mt8183 it's both. And for mt8173 it will probably be
mediatek+pvr pretty soon. Each of these SoCs (like most Arm devices)
have a separate display controller and GPU, with different drivers for
each. They'll run different tests with different xfails. So we should
figure out a way to support igt running for both devices on the one
system.
Cheers,
Daniel
Hi Daniel,
On 29/11/23 18:52, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Vignesh,
>
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 12:19, Vignesh Raman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Expected driver for mt8173 is "mediatek" and for mt8183
>> it is "panfrost". Set IGT_FORCE_DRIVER to 'mediatek' as
>> the expected driver for mt8173.
>
> Actually, for mt8183 it's both. And for mt8173 it will probably be
> mediatek+pvr pretty soon. Each of these SoCs (like most Arm devices)
> have a separate display controller and GPU, with different drivers for
> each. They'll run different tests with different xfails. So we should
> figure out a way to support igt running for both devices on the one
> system.
Agree. Will work on separate patch to test both the drivers for these
devices.
Regards,
Vignesh