Of course its probably something to do with init,
but does anyone know whats going wrong? whats system.map
actually for, Im using a vanilla 2.5.54 and MDK9.0.
:(
Of course im probably opening my self up to lines like
"thick twat wouldn't know a devel kernel if he was electrocuted from pissing on the pc that held one.."
Now i know why I preferred 2.4, I could get it working.
:)
---
Cheers, Dean.
Need a new email address that people can remember
Check out the new EudoraMail at
http://www.eudoramail.com
> Of course its probably something to do with init,
> but does anyone know whats going wrong?
Boot with init=/bin/sh and see what happens.
> whats system.map actually for
Decoding numerical addresses in to function names.
John.
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 17:58, Dean McEwan wrote:
> Of course its probably something to do with init,
> but does anyone know whats going wrong? whats system.map
> actually for, Im using a vanilla 2.5.54 and MDK9.0.
> :(
> Of course im probably opening my self up to lines like
> "thick twat wouldn't know a devel kernel if he was electrocuted from pissing on the pc that held one.."
>
> Now i know why I preferred 2.4, I could get it working.
> :)
I don't understand a thing of what you're saying...
________________________________________________________________________
Felipe Alfaro Solana
Linux Registered User #287198
http://counter.li.org
He's saying the 2.5 kernel won't come up
on his system -
Dean it'd be good to see your .config and
probably lspci and lsmod from the box when
it's running 2.4 - be sure and send those to
the list when asking such an open ended
question -
BTW have you compiled a 2.4 kernel, or
have you been running vendor kernels
until trying 2.5?
Joe
Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
>On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 17:58, Dean McEwan wrote:
>
>
>>Of course its probably something to do with init,
>>but does anyone know whats going wrong? whats system.map
>>actually for, Im using a vanilla 2.5.54 and MDK9.0.
>>:(
>>Of course im probably opening my self up to lines like
>>"thick twat wouldn't know a devel kernel if he was electrocuted from pissing on the pc that held one.."
>>
>>Now i know why I preferred 2.4, I could get it working.
>>:)
>>
>>
>
>I don't understand a thing of what you're saying...
>
>________________________________________________________________________
> Felipe Alfaro Solana
> Linux Registered User #287198
>http://counter.li.org
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to [email protected]
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>